The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 7 of the 9 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Establishing cardiovascular safety of new therapies for type 2 diabetes is important. Safety data are available for the subcutaneous form of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist semaglutide but are needed for oral semaglutide. METHODS: We assessed cardiovascular outcomes of once-daily oral semaglutide in an event-driven, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving patients at high cardiovascular risk (age of ≥50 years with established cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease, or age of ≥60 years with cardiovascular risk factors only). The primary outcome in a time-to-event analysis was the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke). The trial was designed to rule out 80% excess cardiovascular risk as compared with placebo (noninferiority margin of 1.8 for the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio for the primary outcome). RESULTS: A total of 3183 patients were randomly assigned to receive oral semaglutide or placebo. The mean age of the patients was 66 years; 2695 patients (84.7%) were 50 years of age or older and had cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease. The median time in the trial was 15.9 months. Major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 61 of 1591 patients (3.8%) in the oral semaglutide group and 76 of 1592 (4.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 1.11; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Results for components of the primary outcome were as follows: death from cardiovascular causes, 15 of 1591 patients (0.9%) in the oral semaglutide group and 30 of 1592 (1.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.92); nonfatal myocardial infarction, 37 of 1591 patients (2.3%) and 31 of 1592 (1.9%), respectively (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.90); and nonfatal stroke, 12 of 1591 patients (0.8%) and 16 of 1592 (1.0%), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.57). Death from any cause occurred in 23 of 1591 patients (1.4%) in the oral semaglutide group and 45 of 1592 (2.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.84). Gastrointestinal adverse events leading to discontinuation of oral semaglutide or placebo were more common with oral semaglutide. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving patients with type 2 diabetes, the cardiovascular risk profile of oral semaglutide was not inferior to that of placebo. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; PIONEER 6 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02692716.).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
7 of 9 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Recently, trials evaluating a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (empagliflozin) and a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogue (liraglutide) have shown improved cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes who were at high risk for cardiovascular events.2,3”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > CONCLUSIONS
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [2] source
The Study Design (p. 2) identifies this as a trial of empagliflozin in adults with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk. The Cardiovascular Outcomes section (p. 4) reports a significantly lower rate of the primary cardiovascular outcome with empagliflozin than with placebo. This source supports the empagliflozin portion of the sentence; the separately cited liraglutide trial is not attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Supportedcites [3] source
The Methods describe a trial of liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk. The Discussion reports lower rates of cardiovascular events in the liraglutide group than in the placebo group, supporting the portion of the sentence attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The number of patients who would need to be treated to prevent one event of the primary outcome over a period of 24 months was 45 on the basis of Kaplan-Meier estimates.8”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [8] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “Only survival probabilities available” section explains how to calculate a time-specific number needed to treat from Kaplan–Meier estimates. It does not report an NNT of 45 at 24 months; the Discussion table gives 6.4 at two years for its lung-cancer example. Thus the source supports the method, but not the claimed result. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“To date, two antihyperglycemic agents have been shown to reduce the rate of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk.2,3”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [2] source
The Conclusions (p. 1) report that patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk who received empagliflozin had a lower rate of the primary composite cardiovascular outcome than those receiving placebo. This paper supports empagliflozin as one of the two agents in the jointly cited sentence; it need not establish the result for the other agent. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [3] source
The Discussion reports a lower risk of the primary cardiovascular composite outcome with liraglutide than with placebo. It also describes cardiovascular benefits with empagliflozin in a previously reported trial. The conclusion identifies the liraglutide trial population as patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk; together, these passages support the two-agent statement. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Retinopathy complications § 50 (3.0)1.49 29 (1.8) 0.86 1.76 (1.11-2.78)0.02”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“there was an unexpected higher rate of retinopathy complications (vitreous hemorrhage, blindness, or the need for treatment with an intravitreal agent or photocoagulation) in the semaglutide group.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Other Outcomes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similar risk reductions for the primary outcome and its components were observed for both doses of semaglutide (Fig. S4 in the Supplementary Appendix).”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Cardiovascular Outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From cardiovascular cause 44 (2.7) 1.29 46 (2.8) 1.35 0.98 (0.65-1.48) 0.92”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“no significant difference in the rate of cardiovascular death”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Other Outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fewer serious adverse events occurred in the semaglutide group, although more patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events, mainly gastrointestinal.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nonfatal stroke occurred in 27 patients (1.6%) in the semaglutide group and 44 (2.7%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.99; P = 0.04) (Fig. 1C).”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“nonfatal stroke occurred in 1.6% and 2.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.99; P = 0.04).”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Cardiovascular Outcomes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The treatment difference between groups was first seen very early in the trial.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Microvascular Outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 50Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rates of new or worsening nephropathy were lower in the semaglutide group, but rates of retinopathy complications (vitreous hemorrhage, blindness, or conditions requiring treatment with an intravitreal agent or photocoagulation) were significantly higher (hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.78; P = 0.02).”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 33
- Probably not a substantial claim. 14
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Acute pancreatitis occurred in 9 patients in the semaglutide group and in 12 in the placebo group; all events were mild, according to the revised Atlanta criteria.7”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Safety
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [7] source
The cited paper defines mild acute pancreatitis under the revised Atlanta classification as having no organ failure or local or systemic complications (Mild acute pancreatitis section). The citation supports the severity criteria used to describe the events, not the semaglutide and placebo event counts reported by the citing study. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 9Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“An association between rapid glucose lowering and worsening of retinopathy has been reported in patients with type 1 diabetes.9,10”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [9] source
- Supportedcites [10] source
The Introduction states that this study found an association between rapid improvement in blood glucose control and worsening of retinopathy. The Discussion describes the deterioration as transient, and the study population was patients with type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The composite primary outcome occurred in 108 of 1648 patients (6.6%) in the semaglutide group and 146 of 1649 (8.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.95; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P = 0.02 for superiority) (Fig. 1A).”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“The primary outcome occurred in 108 of 1648 patients (6.6%) in the semaglutide group and in 146 of 1649 patients (8.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.95; P<0.001 for noninferiority).”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Cardiovascular Outcomes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the majority of patients, antibody formation was transient -only 4 patients tested positive during follow-up -and antibody titers were generally low.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Safety
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 4Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the mean systolic blood pressure in the semaglutide group, as compared with the placebo group, was 1.3 mm Hg lower in the group receiving 0.5 mg (P = 0.10)”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Other Outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Antibodies against semaglutide were detected in 30 patients treated with semaglutide, with the greatest number of patients (14) testing positive at week 44.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Safety
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 30Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At week 104, among patients receiving semaglutide, the mean body weight decreased from 92.1 kg at baseline to 88.5 kg in the group receiving 0.5 mg and to 87.2 kg in the group receiving 1.0 mg, for changes of -3.6 kg and -4.9 kg, respectively; in the placebo group, the mean body weight decreased to 91.4 kg and 91.6 kg, for changes of -0.7 kg and -0.5 kg, respectively.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Body Weight
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a nonsignificant (26%) decrease in nonfatal myocardial infarction”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At baseline, 2735 of the patients (83.0%) had established cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, or both.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 2,735Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The risk of cardiovascular death was similar in the two groups, with deaths reported in 44 patients (2.7%) in the semaglutide group and 46 (2.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.48; P = 0.92) (Fig. 1D).”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“Rates of death from cardiovascular causes were similar in the two groups.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Cardiovascular Outcomes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the mean body weight in the semaglutide group, as compared with the placebo group, was 2.9 kg lower in the group receiving 0.5 mg and 4.3 kg lower in the group receiving 1.0 mg (P<0.001 for both comparisons) (Fig. 2B, and Table S10 in the Supplementary Appendix).”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Body Weight
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 47 patients (2.9%) in the semaglutide group and 64 (3.9%) in the placebo group, a difference that was not significant (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08; P = 0.12) (Fig. 1B).”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“Nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 2.9% of the patients receiving semaglutide and in 3.9% of those receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08; P = 0.12)”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Cardiovascular Outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 47Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The rates of malignant neoplasms, which were similar in the two groups, were higher in the semaglutide group receiving 1.0 mg and lower in the group receiving 0.5 mg than in the placebo groups”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Safety
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the overall number of retinopathy events was low, there was an unexpected higher rate of retinopathy complications (vitreous hemorrhage, blindness, or the need for treatment with an intravitreal agent or photocoagulation) in the semaglutide group.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the mean pulse rate in the semaglutide group, as compared with the placebo group, was 2.0 bpm higher in the group receiving 0.5 mg”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Other Outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a significant (39%) decrease in the rate of nonfatal stroke”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“During the trial, significantly more patients in the placebo group than in the semaglutide group received additional antihyperglycemic agents, including insulin, which was initiated more than twice as frequently in the placebo group (Table S7B in the Supplementary Appendix).”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Glycemic Control
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At week 104, among patients receiving semaglutide, the mean glycated hemoglobin level decreased from 8.7% at baseline to 7.6% in the group receiving 0.5 mg and to 7.3% in the group receiving 1.0 mg, for changes of -1.1% and -1.4%, respectively; in the placebo group, the mean level decreased to 8.3% in the two dose groups, for a reduction of 0.4% in each group.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Glycemic Control
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the mean glycated hemoglobin level in the semaglutide group, as compared with the placebo group, was 0.7 percentage points lower in the group receiving 0.5 mg and 1.0 percentage point lower in the group receiving 1.0 mg (estimated treatment difference) (P<0.001 for both comparisons) (Fig. 2A, and Table S10 in the Supplementary Appendix).”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Glycemic Control
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The majority of gastrointestinal events were mild or moderate in severity and occurred during the first 30 weeks.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Safety
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fewer serious adverse events occurred in the semaglutide group, although more patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events, mainly gastrointestinal.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The rate of malignant neoplasms was similar in the pooled semaglutide group and the pooled placebo group, although the highest rate was observed with the semaglutide dose of 1.0 mg.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clinically meaningful and sustained weight loss and a reduction in systolic blood pressure occurred in the semaglutide group versus the placebo group over 2 years.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the treatment effect of semaglutide and the accrual of more events than estimated resulted in a significantly lower risk of the primary outcome among patients in the semaglutide group.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The rate of pancreatic cancer -an event of interest for this drug class -was lower with semaglutide, and no medullary thyroid carcinomas were reported in this trial.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Semaglutide was associated with significant and sustained reductions in glycated hemoglobin levels, as compared with placebo, with similar rates of hypoglycemia.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“P values other than that for the primary hypothesis have not been adjusted for multiplicity and have been calculated to test for null hypotheses of no difference.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Statistical Analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial at 230 sites in 20 countries.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Trial Design and Oversight
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This lower risk was principally driven by a significant (39%) decrease in the rate of nonfatal stroke and a nonsignificant (26%) decrease in nonfatal myocardial infarction, with no significant difference in the rate of cardiovascular death.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An independent data and safety monitoring committee performed ongoing surveillance and had access to all the data in an unblinded fashion.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Trial Design and Oversight
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The risk reduction for the primary outcome was seen despite an increase in pulse rate, a class effect for GLP-1-receptor agonists.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The increase in pulse rate observed with semaglutide is a class effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mean percentage of time during which patients received semaglutide was 86.5% (87.7% among those receiving 0.5 mg and 85.3% among those receiving 1.0 mg), and the mean percentage during which patients received placebo was 89.5% (89.4% among those receiving 0.5 mg and 89.6% among those receiving 1.0 mg).”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Patients
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Testing for superiority for the primary outcome was not prespecified or adjusted for multiplicity.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Statistical Analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Vital status was known for 99.6% of the patients by the end of the trial (Figs.S1A and S1B in the Supplementary Appendix).”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Patients
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The randomization of patients was stratified according to cardiovascular disease status (established cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease or cardiovascular risk factors only), insulin treatment (none, basal insulin only, or premixed insulin), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (≤30 ml or >30 ml per minute per 1.73 m 2 of body-surface area) at screening.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Procedures
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All results were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis that included the full analysis set (i.e., all patients who underwent randomization according to the planned treatment), with the exception of adverse events leading to premature discontinuation, which were included in the as-treated safety analysis.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Statistical Analysis
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Semaglutide, a GLP-1 analogue with an extended half-life of approximately 1 week (which permits once-weekly subcutaneous administration), 4”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > CONCLUSIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [4] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rates of premature treatment discontinuation were similar across groups (20% overall) (Table S5 in the Supplementary Appendix).”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Patients
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Semaglutide-treated patients had a lower risk of new or worsening nephropathy, according to differences in macroalbuminuria, but a higher risk of diabetic retinopathy complications than did those receiving placebo.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each outcome, except for peripheral revascularization, was adjudicated in a blinded fashion by an external, independent event-adjudication committee.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Outcomes
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this trial, the risk reduction of the primary outcome was driven by a significant decrease in the rate of nonfatal stroke and a nonsignificant decrease in the rate of nonfatal myocardial infarction, with no difference in cardiovascular death.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Patients were followed for a relatively short duration (2.1 years) and were at high cardiovascular risk.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The beneficial effect of semaglutide on cardiovascular outcomes may relate to modification of the progression of atherosclerosis.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It was not powered to show superiority, so such testing was not prespecified.”
§ Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The cardiovascular effects of semaglutide in type 2 diabetes are unknown.
“The cardiovascular effects of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue with an extended half-life of approximately 1 week, in type 2 diabetes are unknown.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Semaglutide is currently in development but not yet approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
“is currently in development but not yet approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The increase in pulse rate observed with semaglutide is a class effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists.
“a class effect for GLP-1-receptor agonists.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Major cardiovascular trials in patients with T2DM, including the LEADER, SUSTAIN-6, HARMONY Outcomes and REWIND trials, 22 -25 have collectively demonstrated a significant reduction in cardiovascular death with GLP-1RA therapy, ranging from 12% to 26%.”
From Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists improve biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials (2021) · cites this paper as [23]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Serious adverse events varied from 7% to 25.2%”
From Assessment of Thyroid Carcinogenic Risk and Safety Profile of GLP1-RA Semaglutide (Ozempic) Therapy for Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity: A Systematic Literature Review (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“In the SUSTAIN program, 83 patients (1.4%) treated with semaglutide developed a gallbladder event, compared with 39 patients (1.9%) in the placebo group”
From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Specifically, compared with placebo, empagliflozin reduced the risk of incident or worsening nephropathy (a composite of progression to UACR >300 mg/g creatinine, doubling of serum creatinine, ESKD, or death from ESKD) by 39%”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [98]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“and the risk of reduction in eGFR, ESKD, or death from ESKD by 40%”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [98]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“liraglutide reduced the risk of new or worsening nephropathy (a composite of persistent macroalbuminuria, doubling of serum creatinine, ESKD, or death from ESKD) by 22%”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [98]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“and the risk of doubling of serum creatinine accompanied by eGFR #45 mL/min/1.73m 2 by 44%”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [98]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“canagliflozin reduced the risk of progression of albuminuria by 27% and the risk of reduction in eGFR, kidney failure, or death from kidney failure by 40%”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [107]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“empagliflozin reduced the risk of incident or worsening nephropathy (a composite of progression to UACR >300 mg/g creatinine, doubling of serum creatinine, kidney failure, or death from kidney failure) by 39% and the risk of doubling of serum creatinine accompanied by eGFR ≤45 mL/ min/1.73m 2 by 44%”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [107]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“liraglutide reduced the risk of new or worsening nephropathy (a composite of persistent macroalbuminuria, doubling of serum creatinine, kidney failure, or death from kidney failure) by 22%”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [107]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“dulaglutide reduced the composite kidney outcome (risk of ≥40% sustained decline in eGFR, kidney failure, or kidney-related death) by 25%”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [107]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The selection of medications to lower BP in persons with T2D should be guided by individual-specific considerations and may include nontraditional BP-lowering agents such as SGLT2is and GLP-1 RAs, though these drugs alone may be inadequate to control BP.”
From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [239]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Therapies shown to positively affect albuminuria and declining eGFR include ACE inhibitors, ARBs, SGLT2is, GLP-1 RAs, and the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist finerenone.197,209,239,242,393,423–435”
From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [239]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Multiple studies have shown renal and CV benefits of SGLT2is239,424–426,444,1052–1054”
From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [239]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Empagliflozin and canagliflozin demonstrated reduction in MACE in CVOTs; empagliflozin also demonstrated decreased CV death and all-cause mortality.”
From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [239]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“GLP‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) improve glycemic control, promote weight loss and reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in high‐risk patients with T2DM [1, 2, 3]”
From Effects of GLP ‐1 Receptor Agonists and Dual GIP / GLP ‐1 Receptor Agonists on Inflammatory and Metabolic Biomarkers in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A once-weekly injection of 2.4 mg of semaglutide resulted in a remarkable reduction in body weight by − 14.9% in adults with obesity, along with substantial improvements in glucose homeostasis and reduced risk of cardiovascular events [66, 67].”
From Dual and Triple Incretin-Based Co-agonists: Novel Therapeutics for Obesity and Diabetes (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Cardiovascular outcome trials show that treatment with long-acting GLP-1 medicines such as liraglutide, dulaglutide, and semaglutide reduces cardiovascular events in people living with T2D and with semaglutide also in people living with obesity (60–62).”
From Antiinflammatory actions of glucagon-like peptide-1–based therapies beyond metabolic benefits (2025) · cites this paper as [60]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) medications improve health outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).”
From Differences in GLP-1 RA medication adherence across place-based variables in patients with diabetes living in Wisconsin (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Prior to this pooled analysis, it was known that treatment with semaglutide in patients with diabetes, obesity, or both conditions improves cardiometabolic risk factors and reduces major adverse CV events. 25-27”
From Semaglutide versus placebo in people with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM randomised trials (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“including nausea (2.05% to 19.95%)”
From Assessment of Thyroid Carcinogenic Risk and Safety Profile of GLP1-RA Semaglutide (Ozempic) Therapy for Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity: A Systematic Literature Review (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“GLP-1RAs, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for type 2 diabetes (T2D) treatment in 2017, offer well-documented benefits in reducing cardiovascular and kidney complications.”
From Semaglutide and Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Semaglutide predictably resulted in greater reductions in both plasma glucose and HbA1c concentrations than standard-of-care treatment.”
From The science of safety: adverse effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists as glucose-lowering and obesity medications (2026) · cites this paper as [81]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Based on the MACE reduction observed in SUSTAIN 6 [30], it should be preferred in patients with established ASCVD (secondary prevention).”
From Precision obesity medicine: A phenotype-guided framework for pharmacologic therapy across the lifespan (2025) · cites this paper as [30]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Despite promising data showing 20%-26% reductions in cardiovascular and some diabetes-related microvascular outcomes in high-risk populations with T2D or established cardiovascular disease treated with semaglutide for 1.3-3.3.years, 12,99”
From The societal implications of using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [99]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“None of these were medullary carcinoma.”
From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The events mainly included cholelithiasis.”
From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In the SUSTAIN program, acute kidney failure was only reported in SUSTAIN 6, where its occurrence was similar between semaglutide and placebo”
From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The SUSTAIN6 (Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular and Other Long-term Outcomes With Semaglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes) trial reported that only 22.6% of patients prematurely discontinued semaglutide during the 24-month trial period.”
From Real-world weight change, adherence, and discontinuation among patients with type 2 diabetes initiating glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in the UK (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“By contrast, we observed no meaningful differences in persistence or dosing patterns by CVD history, despite robust evidence for cardioprotective benefits of GLP‐1RAs in patients with established CVD. 7 , 8 , 9 , 10”
From Real‐world persistence and dose titration of GLP ‐1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes: A UK population‐based cohort study by obesity and cardiovascular disease status (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Across these trials, semaglutide demonstrated significant body weight reductions from baseline to end of treatment versus all comparators.”
From Semaglutide for the treatment of antipsychotic-associated weight gain in patients not responding to metformin – a case series (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“and semaglutide reduced the risk of new or worsening nephropathy (a composite of persistent UACR >300 mg/g creatinine, doubling of serum creatinine, or ESKD) by 36% (each P < 0.01).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [98]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Large clinical trials have shown benefits of newer glucose-lowering medications on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with CKD with type 2 diabetes.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14”
From Disparities in SGLT2 Inhibitor or Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Initiation Among Medicare-Insured Adults With CKD in the United States (2023) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Five large randomized clinical trials (the EMPA-REG OUTCOME, the Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study [CANVAS], the Dapagliflozin Effect on Cardiovascular Events–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 58 [DECLARE–TIMI 58], CREDENCE, and DAPA-CKD) demonstrated cardiovascular benefits, and kidney protective benefits of SGLT2i.5, 6, 7, 8,11,12,34”
From Disparities in SGLT2 Inhibitor or Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Initiation Among Medicare-Insured Adults With CKD in the United States (2023) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, significant benefits of SGLT2i were shown among the subgroup patients (aged greater than or equal to 65 years) in the study of EMPAREG, CANVAS, DECLARE, and DAPA-CKD.6, 7, 8,11,12,34”
From Disparities in SGLT2 Inhibitor or Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Initiation Among Medicare-Insured Adults With CKD in the United States (2023) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The clinical trials that may have impacted our results were the CANVAS (canagliflozin, published 2017), EMPA-REG OUTCOME (empagliflozin, 2015), the Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular and Other Long-term Outcomes with Semaglutide in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN-6) trial (semaglutide, 2016), and the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results (LEAD”
From Disparities in SGLT2 Inhibitor or Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Initiation Among Medicare-Insured Adults With CKD in the United States (2023) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This stepwise approach anchored in trial evidence strengthens confidence in the validity and applicability of the current results, reinforcing the role of GLP-1-based therapies beyond previously established benefits in the evolving management of cardiometabolic HFpEF.54,56-62”
From Semaglutide and Tirzepatide in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (2025) · cites this paper as [58]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Large cardiovascular outcome trials have shown that GLP‐1RAs reduce major adverse cardiovascular events and slow progression of kidney disease in high‐risk patients [1, 2, 3].”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“with similar benefits observed in these patient groups in trials of subcutaneous or oral semaglutide (hazard ratios of 0.74 and 0.79, respectively). 40,41”
From Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes (2023) · cites this paper as [41]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Initially approved for T2D management, GLP-1 RAs have also demonstrated cardiovascular and renal benefits [5–7].”
From Triple Agonism Based Therapies for Obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It was then found that patients with diabetes and high cardiovascular risk that were treated with liraglutide and semaglutide, but not exenatide, had a lower risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke [66, 70, 71] and another GLP-1R agonist, dulaglutide, reduced major adverse cardiovascular events [72].”
From Dual and Triple Incretin-Based Co-agonists: Novel Therapeutics for Obesity and Diabetes (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In SUSTAIN 6, semaglutide significantly reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with placebo, and was non-inferior to placebo in PIONEER 6, in people of varying cardiovascular risk, with type 2 diabetes.30,31”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The CV outcomes trials, SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6, which were part of these programs, demonstrated CV benefits with s.c. semaglutide and CV non-inferiority with oral semaglutide vs placebo, respectively [14, 15].”
From Impact of semaglutide on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: exploratory patient-level analyses of SUSTAIN and PIONEER randomized clinical trials (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The SUSTAIN‐6 trial of semaglutide for T2D suggested a potential link of this GLP‐1RA with worsening diabetic retinopathy, 114 which was not observed in, for example, the liraglutide or dulaglutide trials. 115”
From Real‐world evidence on the utilization, clinical and comparative effectiveness, and adverse effects of newer GLP ‐ 1RA ‐based weight‐loss therapies (2025) · cites this paper as [114]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Patients receiving semaglutide (0.5 or 1.0 mg) for 104 weeks demonstrated a significantly higher risk of diabetic retinopathy complications, including vitreous hemorrhage, blindness, or required procedural treatment compared to those receiving placebo (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.78).”
From Exploring the Side Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist: To Ensure Its Optimal Positioning (2025) · cites this paper as [89]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Subcutaneous semaglutide treatment led to an increased number of retinopathy complications in the SUSTAIN-6 cardiovascular outcomes trial (81).”
From The science of safety: adverse effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists as glucose-lowering and obesity medications (2026) · cites this paper as [81]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In SUSTAIN-6, severe or plasma glucose-confirmed (<56 mg/dl [3.1 mol/L]) hypoglycemia occurred in similar rates between patients with semaglutide (23.1% in the 0.5 mg group and 21.7% in the 1 mg group) and placebo (21.2%) (28).”
From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In SUSTAIN 6, acute pancreatitis occurred in 9 semaglutide-treated patients, and in 12 placebo-treated patients.”
From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Pancreatic cancer occurred in one and four patients, respectively (28).”
From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Despite evidence from clinical trials demonstrating benefits in glycaemic control, weight loss, and cardiorenal outcomes, 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 real‐world adherence to GLP‐1RA therapy remains suboptimal in patients with type 2 diabetes. 11 , 12 , 13”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) have also been shown to improve kidney outcomes (95-100).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [98]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The SUSTAIN-6 trial is another example in which semaglutide was compared to placebo and was demonstrated to result in reduced cardiovascular risk.8”
From Tirzepatide: Clinical review of the twincretin injectable (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Similarly, previously mentioned clinical trials have demonstrated superiority of certain GLP-1 receptor agonists to placebo in reducing the risk of MACE.[7][8][9]”
From Tirzepatide: Clinical review of the twincretin injectable (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As previously discussed, several medications in the SGLT-2 inhibitor and GLP-1 receptor agonist drug classes have been demonstrated to have cardiovascular and renal benefits for patients.[7][8][9][37][38][39]”
From Tirzepatide: Clinical review of the twincretin injectable (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“No increased risk of heart failure hospitalization has been identified in the cardiovascular outcomes trials of the GLP-1 RAs lixisenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, exenatide once weekly, albiglutide, or dulaglutide compared with placebo (261,264,265,296,297).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [296]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Results of trials with the GLP-1 RAs liraglutide (once daily) and semaglutide, albiglutide, efpeglenatide, and dulaglutide (once weekly) have all shown evidence of a reduction in major atherosclerotic cardiovascular outcomes (MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death) (251–256).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [252]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In cardiovascular outcomes trials, GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with T2D (67–70).”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The GLP-1 receptor agonists with favorable CKD outcomes include lixisenatide, exenatide (once weekly), liraglutide, semaglutide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, and efpeglenatide (67,68,70,72–76).”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“s.c. semaglutide has demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in the SUSTAIN-6 trial, which was designed to assess the non-inferiority of s.c. semaglutide as compared with placebo in terms of cardiovascular safety in people with type 2 diabetes at increased cardiovascular risk [31]”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The intervention duration ranged from 24 to 28 weeks in five trials and from 30 to 56 weeks in 21 trials. The remaining two trials, a trial with tirzepatide in people with obesity and type 2 diabetes (SURMOUNT-2) [50] and a cardiovascular outcomes trial with semaglutide (SUSTAIN 6) [31], had a duration of 72 and 104 weeks, respectively.”
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Multiple large CVOTs and kidney outcome trials of SGLT2is have demonstrated robust and consistent reductions in the risk of hospitalization for HF in persons with T2D.239,423,425,426,648”
From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [239]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, and ertugliflozin have shown a decrease in hospitalization for HF in their CVOTs.”
From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [239]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“More recently, empagliflozin was demonstrated to reduce the combined risk of CV death or hospitalization for HF in persons with HFpEF, regardless of the presence or absence of DM.239,425,426,443”
From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [239]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“However, the exogenous administration of GLP-1RAs can mitigate sympathetic excitability by suppressing the peripheral chemoreflex originating from the carotid body.467”
From Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor: mechanisms and advances in therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [467]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In this study, baseline retinopathy status had, perhaps surprisingly, not been assessed, and there were not any systematic follow-up examinations during the trial.”
From The science of safety: adverse effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists as glucose-lowering and obesity medications (2026) · cites this paper as [81]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“longterm results with GLP1-RAs are still not comparable to surgical outcomes.”
From The societal implications of using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [99]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Serum calcitonin was measured during these trials, and no notable difference in mean levels was seen between the treatment arms.”
From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In the SUSTAIN program, three adjudicated events of malignant thyroid neoplasm were identified, two in semaglutide-treated patients (combined n = 5,933), and one in the comparator group (n = 4,736)”
From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“More than 62% of adults with T1D in the United States are either OW (34%) or OB (28%), similar to the 64% of adults without diabetes who are OW (36%) or OB (28%) although lower than the 86% of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who are OW (34%) or OB (52%).19”
From Effectiveness of Semaglutide and Tirzepatide in Overweight and Obese Adults with Type 1 Diabetes (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“canagliflozin reduced the risk of progression of albuminuria by 27%”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [98]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“However, the composite kidney outcomes in these trials were evaluated as secondary outcomes, and the reported effects were largely driven by a lower risk of new-onset macroalbuminuria. 23-25”
From Effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists on kidney and cardiovascular disease outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2025) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“In line with this, subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg once weekly, like other GLP‐1RAs [15], has been shown to reduce major adverse CV events (MACE) in patients with type 2 diabetes and high CV risk [16].”
From Semaglutide for cardiovascular event reduction in people with overweight or obesity: SELECT study baseline characteristics (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“Following these regulatory requirements, several cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOT) have been completed, which demonstrate that certain anti-diabetic treatments are associated with a lower risk of CVD [17–20].”
From Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review of scientific evidence from across the world in 2007–2017 (2018) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Newer antidiabetic drugs have been shown to lower the risk of CVD in T2DM patients [17–20]; however, these drugs are often intended to be used as second- to third-line treatments and many years may pass before patients can benefit.”
From Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review of scientific evidence from across the world in 2007–2017 (2018) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Emerging data support the efficacy of GLP-1RAs, in reducing the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), preventing the onset of macroalbuminuria and slowing the progression of renal damage toward ESRD [5, 6]”
From GLP-1 receptor agonists and renal outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and diabetic kidney disease: state of the art (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Emerging data support the efficacy of GLP-1RAs, in reducing the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), preventing the onset of macroalbuminuria and slowing the progression of renal damage toward ESRD [5, 6]”
From GLP-1 receptor agonists and renal outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and diabetic kidney disease: state of the art (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Emerging data support the efficacy of GLP-1RAs, in reducing the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), preventing the onset of macroalbuminuria and slowing the progression of renal damage toward ESRD [5, 6]”
From GLP-1 receptor agonists and renal outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and diabetic kidney disease: state of the art (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Semaglutide reduces the incidence of de novo macroalbuminuria. Nevertheless, no difference was found regarding the incidence of ESRD and death for renal causes.”
From GLP-1 receptor agonists and renal outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and diabetic kidney disease: state of the art (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Semaglutide reduces the incidence of de novo macroalbuminuria. Nevertheless, no difference was found regarding the incidence of ESRD and death for renal causes.”
From GLP-1 receptor agonists and renal outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and diabetic kidney disease: state of the art (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“MACE was reduced by 26% (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.58-0.95];P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.02 for superiority, not prespecified) with semaglutide”
From Benefits of GLP-1 (Glucagon-Like Peptide 1) Receptor Agonists for Stroke Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes: A Call to Action for Neurologists (2022) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Both doses of semaglutide yielded similar risk reductions for MACE and nonfatal stroke.”
From Benefits of GLP-1 (Glucagon-Like Peptide 1) Receptor Agonists for Stroke Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes: A Call to Action for Neurologists (2022) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“and the nonfatal stroke component of MACE was reduced by 39% (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.38-0.99];P=0.04; Figure 1B).”
From Benefits of GLP-1 (Glucagon-Like Peptide 1) Receptor Agonists for Stroke Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes: A Call to Action for Neurologists (2022) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“There was no significant decrease in the outcomes of fatal/nonfatal stroke or fatal stroke alone, and only 5 study participants experienced a fatal stroke.29,40,41”
From Benefits of GLP-1 (Glucagon-Like Peptide 1) Receptor Agonists for Stroke Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes: A Call to Action for Neurologists (2022) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“GLP1-RA have been shown to reduce MACE in patients with T2D with A1c elevation >6.5%, who were at high cardiovascular risk or had established CVD (Table 1) [37], [38], [39], [40], [41].”
From Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in diabetic kidney disease: a review of their kidney and heart protection (2023) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“Given the additional beneficial effects of GLP-1 RAs and SGLT2 inhibitors on CV outcomes in T2DM (Section 5.3), these agents should be the preferred glucose-lowering medication in overweight and obese patients with CVD and T2DM, as obesity medications have, to date, not shown to reduce CV events.[70][71][72]”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [72]
In the citing paper
“A sustained decrease in BP was observed with semaglutide therapy (SBP dose dependent: -1.3 to -2.6 mmHg) with a slight increase in heart rate (+2 to 2.5 beats per minute [b.p.m.]).72”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [72]
In the citing paper
“Trials testing GLP-1 RAs have shown a BP decrease with these drugs, partly due to weight loss.”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [72]
In the citing paper
“Most GLP-1 RAs had a neutral effect on risk of HF hospitalization in the placebo-controlled RCTs assessing CV safety of glucose-lowering medications in patients with T2DM with or at high risk of ASCVD, despite increasing heart rate by 3-5 b.p.m. 70,72,158- 163,544”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [72]
In the citing paper
“cardiovascular event rates remain high, even among the patients with well-managed T2DM enrolled in contemporary outcomes trials,8–10”
From Clinical management of stable coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“several cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) demonstrated that drugs that lowered HbA1c to similar levels had different effects on cardiovascular outcomes”
From Clinical management of stable coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“semaglutide produced a 26% RRR in MACEs (6.6% versus 8.9%) but no reduction in cardiovascular mortality”
From Clinical management of stable coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“A limitation of our study is that it was started before GLP-1 receptor agonists 24 and SGLT2 inhibitors 25 were shown to reduce major cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with stable cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes.”
In the citing paper
“More patients discontinued treatment in the semaglutide group because of adverse events, mainly gastrointestinal.”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [204]
In the citing paper
“The primary outcome (the fi rst occurrence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke) occurred in 108 patients (6.6%) in the semaglutide group vs. 146 patients (8.9%) in the placebo group (HR 0.74 [95% CI 0.58 -0.95]; P < 0.001).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [204]
In the citing paper
“and four FDA-approved GLP-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide, albiglutide [although that agent was removed from the market for business reasons], semaglutide [lower risk of cardiovascular events in a moderate-sized clinical trial but one not powered as a cardiovascular outcomes trial], and dulaglutide).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [204]
In the citing paper
“No increased risk of heart failure hospitalization has been identi fi ed in the cardiovascular outcomes trials of the GLP-1 receptor agonists lixisenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, exenatide once-weekly, albiglutide, or dulaglutide compared with placebo ( Table 10.3 B ) (203,204,207 -209).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023 (2023) · cites this paper as [204]
In the citing paper
“Additionally, GLP-1 analogues also appear to decrease the risk of cardiovascular pathology in patients, according to some studies, and preliminary data suggest they do so to a greater degree than other oral glucose-lowering drugs.262,275–277”
From A review of current trends with type 2 diabetes epidemiology, aetiology, pathogenesis, treatments and future perspectives (2021) · cites this paper as [275]
In the citing paper
“However, these benefits were driven by a lower risk of persistent macroalbuminuria [6,10,13].”
In the citing paper
“In older patients with T2DM, weight loss not only improves glycemic control but also reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease,11 which is especially important in this population.”
From Semaglutide Therapy and Accelerated Sarcopenia in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A 24-Month Retrospective Cohort Study (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The primary composite outcome -- death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke -- occurred in significantly fewer participants treated by semaglutide (6.6%) than by placebo (8.9%) (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.95; p<0.001 for noninferiority; p=0.02 for superiority).”
From Semaglutide for the treatment of obesity (2023) · cites this paper as [39]
In the citing paper
“The small mean increase in pulse rate does not appear to adversely affect cardiovascular outcomes, as revealed by results of the Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular and Other Long-term Outcomes with Semaglutide in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN-6).(39)”
From Semaglutide for the treatment of obesity (2023) · cites this paper as [39]
In the citing paper
“Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) are the currently most efficacious weight lowering drugs.”
In the citing paper
“The efficacy and safety profile of the GLP1-RAs liraglutide and semaglutide are well-documented, with an average body weight loss of up to 15%, usually transient mild to moderate gastrointestinal side effects, and cardiorenal benefits [6–8].”
In the citing paper
“In SUSTAIN-6, treatment with semaglutide 1 mg led to the development of retinopathy-related complications in more people (3%) compared to placebo (1.8%)”
In the citing paper
“the risk was higher for people with a history of proliferative or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy at baseline, with higher baseline HbA1c and longer diabetes duration”
In the citing paper
“the SUSTAIN-6 clinical trial that showed a statistically significant reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events in the semaglutide group compared with placebo group (6.6 vs. 8.9%, hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–0.95; p < 0.001) (4, 5).”
From Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with semaglutide: A pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Subsequently, in January 2020, the FDA expanded the indication of semaglutide to include T2DM adults with cardiovascular disease based primarily on the SUSTAIN-6 clinical trial that showed a statistically significant reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events in the semaglutide group compared with placebo group (6.6 vs. 8.9%, hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–0.95; p < 0.”
From Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with semaglutide: A pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“The SUSTAIN 6 clinical trial found that older patients with comorbid conditions were treated with semaglutide for 104 weeks, the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders was somewhat higher (4).”
From Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with semaglutide: A pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system (2022) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Gastrointestinal side effects are typically classed as mild or moderate, and reported to subside in most patients following titration up to maintenance doses (77, 79, 104), although they still lead to permanent discontinuation of treatment in 4% to 10% of participants (77, 79, 95).”
From GLP-1 and the Neurobiology of Eating Control: Recent Advances (2025) · cites this paper as [104]
In the citing paper
“However, recent investigations reported that the suppression of composite cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death by SGT2 inhibitors799), and that the suppressive effects of glucagonlike peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists on ASCVD incidence800, 801).”
From Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) guidelines for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases 2017 (2018) · cites this paper as [799]
In the citing paper
“Clinical trials found that GLP-1 receptor agonists as a class reduced major adverse cardiovascular events [12–15].”
From Effects of Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide on Epicardial Fat Thickness in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity (2020) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“In addition to providing control of diabetes mellitus, GLP-1 receptor agonists have shown to provide weight loss and cardiovascular protective effects [12–15].”
From Effects of Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide on Epicardial Fat Thickness in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity (2020) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“To date, randomized clinical trials of albiglutide, dulaglutide, liraglutide, and injectable semaglutide have reported favorable cardiovascular outcomes.”
From Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“In addition, GLP-1RAs have a favorable safety profile and have been associated with substantial weight loss.4,6,7,9”
From Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Complications of diabetic retinopathy were rare but more commonly seen in patients who received injectable semaglutide vs placebo (3.0% vs 1.8%) in SUSTAIN-6.7”
From Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) reduce cardiovascular events in at-risk individuals with type 2 diabetes.”
From Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“GLP-1RA therapy has a favorable safety profile.”
From Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“This findins has been attributed to the rapid reduction in blood glucose in a patient population at higher risk for retinopathy complications, which has been observed with insulin therapy when poorly controlled hyperglycemia is rapidly rectified.”
From Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“In these trials, GLP-1 receptor agonists had a neutral effect on the risk for HF hospitalization.”
From Type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure: A position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (2018) · cites this paper as [186]
In the citing paper
“Semaglutide (0.5 or 1 mg/week) reduced the primary composite endpoint of first occurrence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal stroke in patients with T2DM and a HbA1c 7% or more compared to placebo (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.94, P<0.001).210”
From The Vasculature in Prediabetes (2018) · cites this paper as [210]
In the citing paper
“Body weight decreased 3.6 kg and 4.9 kg in the 0.5 and 1.0 mg groups.”
From The Vasculature in Prediabetes (2018) · cites this paper as [210]
In the citing paper
“Importantly, long-acting GLP-1 agonists reduce mortality in patients with T2DM.”
From The Vasculature in Prediabetes (2018) · cites this paper as [210]
In the citing paper
“In clinical trials, semaglutide reduced peripheral inflammation [41] and decreased the risk of major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events (MACE) compared with placebo [38–40, 42–45].”
In the citing paper
“In previous clinical trials, semaglutide has demonstrated significant reductions in MACE, including CV-related death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke [38–40, 42–45].”
Citations
Cites
Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes
Zinman, B., Wanner, C., Lachin, J. M., Fitchett, D., Bluhmki, E., Hantel, S., Mattheus, M., Devins, T., Johansen, O. E., Woerle, H. J., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1504720 · Cited by 12,315
Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes
Marso, S. P., Daniels, G. H., Brown-Frandsen, K., Kristensen, P., Mann, J. F. E., Nauck, M. A., Nissen, S. E., Pocock, S., Poulter, N. R., Ravn, L. S., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1603827 · Cited by 7,629
Self-citationBanks, P. A., Bollen, T. L., Dervenis, C., Gooszen, H. G., Johnson, C. D., Sarr, M. G., Tsiotos, G. G., & Vege, S. S. (2013) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779 · Cited by 7,187
Seaquist, E. R., Anderson, J., Childs, B., Cryer, P., Dagogo-Jack, S., Fish, L., Heller, S. R., Rodriguez, H., Rosenzweig, J., & Vigersky, R. (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc12-2480 · Cited by 1,389
Pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus
DeFronzo, R. A. (2004) · Medical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2004.04.013 · Cited by 1,342
Discovery of the once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue semaglutide
Lau, J., Bloch, P., Schäffer, L., Pettersson, I., Spetzler, J., Kofoed, J., Madsen, K., Knudsen, L. B., McGuire, J., Steensgaard, D. B., et al. (2015) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00726 · Cited by 1,105
Plasma Insulin Responses to Oral and Intravenous Glucose: Studies in Normal and Diabetic Subjects*
Perley, M. J., & Kipnis, D. M. (1967) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci105685 · Cited by 917
Calculating the number needed to treat for trials where the outcome is time to an event
Altman, D. G., & Andersen, P. K. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1492 · Cited by 710
Ahmann, A. J., Capehorn, M., Charpentier, G., Dotta, F., Henkel, E., Lingvay, I., Holst, A. G., Annett, M. P., & Aroda, V. R. (2018) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc17-0417 · Cited by 596
Self-citationImpact of diabetes on cardiovascular disease: an update
Matheus, A. S. D. M., Tannus, L. R. M., Cobas, R. A., Palma, C. C. S., Negrato, C. A., & Gomes, M. D. B. (2013) · International Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1155/2013/653789 · Cited by 547
Early Worsening of Diabetic Retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial
(1998) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.116.7.874 · Cited by 509
Seaquist, E. R., Anderson, J., Childs, B., Cryer, P., Dagogo-Jack, S., Fish, L., Heller, S. R., Rodriguez, H., Rosenzweig, J., & Vigersky, R. (2013) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2012-4127 · Cited by 412
Dahl-Jørgensen, K., Brinchmann-Hansen, O., Hanssen, K. F., Sandvik, L., & Aagenaes, O. (1985) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.290.6471.811 · Cited by 360
Nauck, M. A. (2010) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.11.002 · Cited by 298
Impaired regulation of the incretin effect in patients with type 2 diabetes
Bagger, J. I., Knop, F. K., Lund, A., Vestergaard, H., Holst, J. J., & Vilsbøll, T. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2010-2435 · Cited by 219
Cooke, C. E., Lee, H. Y., Tong, Y. P., & Haines, S. T. (2009) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007990903421994 · Cited by 78
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
International Diabetes Federation 2017
Carracher, A. M., Marathe, P. H., & Close, K. L. (2018) · Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1111/1753-0407.12644 · Cited by 13,379
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
Williams, B., Mancia, G., Spiering, W., Agabiti Rosei, E., Azizi, M., Burnier, M., Clement, D. L., Coca, A., de Simone, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2018) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339 · Cited by 10,286
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Benjamin, E. J., Muntner, P., Alonso, A., Bittencourt, M. S., Callaway, C. W., Carson, A. P., Chamberlain, A. M., Chang, A. R., Cheng, S., Das, S. R., et al. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000659 · Cited by 9,036
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes
Knuuti, J., Wijns, W., Saraste, A., Capodanno, D., Barbato, E., Funck-Brentano, C., Prescott, E., Storey, R. F., Deaton, C., Cuisset, T., et al. (2020) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425 · Cited by 7,166
Collet, J.-P., Thiele, H., Barbato, E., Barthélémy, O., Bauersachs, J., Bhatt, D. L., Dendale, P., Dorobantu, M., Edvardsen, T., Folliguet, T., et al. (2021) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575 · Cited by 5,037
Metadata
- Authors
- Marso, S. P., Bain, S. C., Consoli, A., Eliaschewitz, F. G., Jódar, E., Leiter, L. A., Lingvay, I., Rosenstock, J., Seufert, J., Warren, M. L., Woo, V., Hansen, O., Holst, A. G., Pettersson, J., & Vilsbøll, T.
- Affiliations
- St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- ORCID
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2016-11-10
- Volume
- 375
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1834-1844
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2519510391
- Semantic Scholar
- 883e9785193db22caecc913601d42f080b3b93be
- Cited by
- 6,900
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 914 · 2025: 985 · 2024: 845 · 2023: 631 · 2022: 607 · 2021: 641 · 2020: 676 · 2019: 597 · 2018: 535 · 2017: 404 · 2016: 57
- FWCI
- 532.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica (Universidad Europea) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Amgen
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Pfizer
- AstraZeneca
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sanofi
- Intarcia Therapeutics
- MannKind Corporation
- Medicines Company
- Mylan
- Novo Nordisk
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF15OC0016230, NNF12OC1015904, NNF16OC0020224)
- Servier
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- semaglutide, oral semaglutide, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular safety, major adverse cardiovascular events, GLP-1 receptor agonists, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, non-inferiority, high cardiovascular risk, chronic kidney disease, older adults, cardiovascular risk stratification, cardiovascular risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Semaglutide, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Nephropathies, Diabetic Retinopathy, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Kaplan-Meier Estimate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-16, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-16 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review