Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy in Adults

Griffiths, Mark J.D., Evans, Timothy W.·2005·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The therapeutic promise of nitric oxide (NO), a potent vasodilator, remains uncertain for adults, and licensed indications are restricted to pediatric practice. This review considers the biologic actions of inhaled nitric oxide, the clinical indications for its administration in adults, and an assessment of its potential therapeutic development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmra051884

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 99 references

Cited by

See all 398

Metadata

Authors
Griffiths, M. J. D., & Evans, T. W.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2005-12-22
Volume
353
Issue
25
Pages
2683-2695
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2119095639
Cited by
398
References
99
FWCI
12.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy in Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmra051884
The paper
Griffiths, M. J. D., & Evans, T. W. (2005). Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy in Adults. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra051884

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.