Cited by 213Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipReligion and Society Interactions

Religion, spirituality, and medicine: psychiatrists' and other physicians' differing observations, interpretations, and clinical approaches

Open access
Curlin, Farr A., Lawrence, Ryan E., Odell, Shaun, Chin, Marshall H., Lantos, John D., Koenig, Harold G., Meador, Keith G.·2007·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the ways in which psychiatrists and nonpsychiatrists interpret the relationship between religion/spirituality and health and address religion/spirituality issues in the clinical encounter. METHOD: The authors mailed a survey to a stratified random sample of 2,000 practicing U.S. physicians, with an oversampling of psychiatrists. The authors asked the physicians about their beliefs and observations regarding the relationship between religion/spirituality and patient health and about the ways in which they address religion/spirituality in the clinical setting. RESULTS: A total of 1,144 physicians completed the survey. Psychiatrists generally endorse positive influences of religion/spirituality on health, but they are more likely than other physicians to note that religion/spirituality sometimes causes negative emotions that lead to increased patient suffering (82% versus 44%). Compared to other physicians, psychiatrists are more likely to encounter religion/spirituality issues in clinical settings (92% versus 74% report their patients sometimes or often mention religion/spirituality issues), and they are more open to addressing religion/spirituality issues with patients (93% versus 53% say that it is usually or always appropriate to inquire about religion/spirituality). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the vast majority of psychiatrists appreciate the importance of religion and/or spirituality at least at a functional level. Compared to other physicians, psychiatrists also appear to be more comfortable, and have more experience, addressing religion/spirituality concerns in the clinical setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06122088

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curlin, F. A., Lawrence, R. E., Odell, S., Chin, M. H., Lantos, J. D., Koenig, H. G., & Meador, K. G.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2007-12
Volume
164
Issue
12
Pages
1825-1831
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2103704809
Cited by
213
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K23AT002749)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religion and spirituality, psychiatrists, physicians, physician beliefs, spirituality and health, patient suffering, religious distress, physician attitudes
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Mental Disorders, Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Physicians, Psychiatry, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion and Medicine, Sampling Studies, Logistic Models, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review