CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 167Information Systems Theories and ImplementationTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourBusiness Strategies and Management Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 142 of the 145 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Theoretical perspectives in IS research: from variance and process to conceptual latitude and conceptual fit

Burton-Jones, Andrew, McLean, Ephraim R, Monod, Emmanuel·2015·European Journal of Information Systems
DOI 10.1057/ejis.2014.31
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There has been growing interest in theory building in Information Systems (IS) research. We extend this literature by examining theory building perspectives. We define a perspective as a researcher’s choice of the types of concepts and relationships used to construct a theory, and we examine three perspectives – process, variance, and systems. We contribute by clarifying these perspectives and explaining how they can be used more flexibly in future research. We illustrate the value of this more flexible approach by showing how researchers can use different theoretical perspectives to critique and extend an existing theoretical model (in our case, the IS Success Model). Overall, we suggest a shift from the traditional process-variance dichotomy to a broader view defined by conceptual latitude (the types of concepts and relationships available) and conceptual fit (the types of concepts and relationships appropriate for a given study). We explain why this shift should help researchers as they engage in the knowledge generation process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/ejis.2014.31

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Ashby R, 1958, Cybernetica, 1, 83
  2. Campbell DT, 1995, Personality Research, Methods, and Theory: A Festschrift Honoring, 145
  3. Dubin R, 1978, Theory Building (Revised Edition)
  4. Edstrom O, 1973, Man-Computer Decision Making
  5. Glaser BG, 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory
  6. Kant I, 1781, The Critique of Pure Reason
  7. Kozlowski SWJ, 2000, Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations, 3
  8. Schutz A, 1973, Collected Papers, 48
  9. Weber R, 1987, Journal of Information Systems, 1, 3
  10. Webster J, 2002, MIS Quarterly, 26, xiii

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 167

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Burton-Jones, A., McLean, E. R., & Monod, E.
Affiliations
  • UQ Business School, The University of Queensland Brisbane Australia
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
ORCID
Monod, Emmanuel
Venue
European Journal of Information Systems
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2015-11
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
664-679
ISSN
  • 0960-085X (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-9344
DOI
10.1057/ejis.2014.31
OpenAlex
W2047884962
Cited by
167
References
145
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3
FWCI
25.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
  • European Journal of Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
Keywords
theoretical approaches, theory development, process perspective, systems approach, DeLone and McLean model, theoretical model, knowledge production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review