The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Technochange Management: Using IT to Drive Organizational Change
Abstract
Using IT in ways that can trigger major organizational changes creates high-risk, potentially high-reward, situations that I call technochange (for technology-driven organizational change). Technochange differs from typical IT projects and from typical organizational change programs and therefore requires a different approach. One major risk in technochange—that people will not use information technology and related work practices—is not thoroughly addressed by the discipline of IT project management, which focuses on project cost, project schedule, and solution functionality. Organizational change management approaches are also generally not effective on their own, because they take as a given the IT “solutions” developed by a technical team. Consequently, the potential for the IT “solution” to be misaligned with important organizational characteristics, such as culture or incentives, is great. Merely combining IT project management and organizational change management approaches does not produce the best results, for two reasons. First, the additive approach does not effectively address the many failure-threatening problems that can arise over the lengthy sequential process of the typical technochange lifecycle. Second, the additive approach is not structured to produce the characteristics of a good technochange solution: a complete intervention consisting of IT and complementary organizational changes, an implementable solution with minimal misfits with the existing organization, and an organization primed to appropriate the potential benefits of the technochange solution. With hard work and care, the combined IT project management plus organizational change approach can be made to work. However, an iterative, incremental approach to implementing technochange can be a better strategy in many situations. The essential characteristic of the technochange prototyping approach is that each phase involves both new IT functionality and related organizational changes, such as redesigned business processes, new performance metrics, and training.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240109 · Cited by 1,904
Leonardi, P. M. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23043493 · Cited by 1,889
Investigating User Resistance to Information Systems Implementation: A Status Quo Bias Perspective1
Kim, H.-W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650309 · Cited by 1,135
Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective
Boudreau, M.-C., & Robey, D. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0103 · Cited by 1,071
An integrated big data analytics-enabled transformation model: application to health care
Wang, Y., Kung, L., Wang, W. Y. C., & Cegielski, C. G. (2018) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2017.04.001 · Cited by 508
Sharma, R., Mithas, S., & Kankanhalli, A. (2014) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.17 · Cited by 516
Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions
Dwivedi, Y. K., Wastell, D., Laumer, S., Henriksen, H. Z., Myers, M. D., Bunker, D., Elbanna, A., Ravishankar, M. N., & Srivastava, S. C. (2015) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-014-9500-y · Cited by 448
Leonardi, P. M. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.3.04 · Cited by 444
A multi-project model of key factors affecting organizational benefits from enterprise systems
(2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017458.2017464 · Cited by 259
Digitalizing procurement: The impact of data analytics on supply chain performance
Hallikas, J., Immonen, M., & Brax, S. (2021) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-05-2020-0201 · Cited by 218
A Multi-Project Model of Key Factors Affecting Organizational Benefits from Enterprise Systems1
Seddon, P. B., Calvert, C., & Yang, S. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721429 · Cited by 211
An Explanatory Framework for Achieving Business Benefits from ERP Systems
La Trobe University, Staehr, L., Shanks, G., The University of Melbourne, Seddon, P., & The University of Melbourne (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00299 · Cited by 98
Hwang, K., & Choi, M. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.001 · Cited by 85
Investigating the resistance to telemedicine in Ethiopia
Xue, Y., Liang, H., Mbarika, V., Hauser, R., Schwager, P., & Kassa Getahun, M. (2015) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.04.005 · Cited by 59
A methodology for Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) implementation
Govindaraju, R., & Putra, K. (2016) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/114/1/012094 · Cited by 29
Al-Sabri, H. M., Al-Mashari, M., & Chikh, A. (2018) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-07-2016-0139 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Markus, M. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Information Technology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-20
- ISSN
- 0268-3962 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4437
- OpenAlex
- W2087291729
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.