CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,122Quality and Supply ManagementManagement and Optimization TechniquesManagement Systems and Quality Improvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lean Thinking—Banish Waste and Create Wealth in your Corporation

Open access
Womack, J P, Jones, D T·1997·Journal of the Operational Research Society
DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600967
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Los procesos organizacionales están mediados por múltiples factores que inciden en su operatividad y determinan el alcance de sus propósitos, uno de estos factores es la estandarización, la cual, como campo de estudio de la ingeniería industrial examina la unificación de los procedimientos organizacionales, a fin de crear patrones de desempeño y establecer orientaciones sobre actividades y tiempos que componen cada proceso vinculado a la prestación de un servicio. Por tanto, el análisis de la cuestión se centró en proponer un modelo de gestión de procesos en la Universidad ECCI que, con fundamento en Lean thinking, permitiera estandarizar los tiempos de respuesta a las solicitudes y disminuir demoras en la solución de las peticiones; a partir de la consulta de la literatura disponible en distintas fuentes de carácter académico, ingenieril, investigativo y procedimental. La mencionada consulta y la aplicación de distintas herramientas de Lean Service permitió someter tres procesos de la IES a un modelo experimental organizado en Diagramas de flujo y DOP, para hacer efectivo el seguimiento mediante análisis de desempeño de los procesos, mapas VSM y Lean Six Sigma, con un enfoque particularizante en mudas y valor añadido. De esta manera, apoyados en el paradigma pospositivista en el que las realidades son susceptibles de reflexión y los resultados considerados como probablemente verdaderos y una propuesta metodológica descriptiva, los procesos objeto de estudio fueron plasmados…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600967

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,401–1,500 of 1,798

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T.
Venue
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1997-11-01
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
1148-1148
ISSN
  • 0160-5682 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-9360
DOI
10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600967
OpenAlex
W4230227413
Cited by
2,122
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 125 · 2023: 180 · 2022: 164 · 2021: 171 · 2020: 263 · 2019: 150 · 2018: 146 · 2017: 120 · 2016: 114 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 50
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of the Operational Research Society (publishedVersion)
  • Repositorio Digital Universidad ECCI (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management Systems and Quality Improvement
Keywords
lean thinking, lean service, waste elimination, value added, process standardization, response time reduction, value stream mapping, Lean Six Sigma, process management model, educational service quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review