Cited by 62Transportation and Mobility InnovationsTransportation Planning and OptimizationElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure

Multiagent Spatial Simulation of Autonomous Taxis for Urban Commute: Travel Economics and Environmental Impacts

Lu, Miaojia, Taiebat, Morteza, Xu, Ming, Hsu, Shu-Chien·2018·Journal of Urban Planning and Development

Abstract

With the likelihood of autonomous vehicle technologies in public transport and taxi systems increasing, their impact on commuting in real-world road networks is insufficiently studied. In this study, an agent-based model is developed to simulate how commuters travel by autonomous taxis (aTaxis) in real-world road networks. The model evaluates the travel costs and environmental implications of substituting conventional personal vehicle travel with aTaxi travel. The proposed model is applied to the city of Ann Arbor, Michigan, to demonstrate the effectiveness of aTaxis. The results indicate that to meet daily commute demand with wait times less than 3 min, the optimized autonomous taxi fleet size is only 20% of the conventional solo-commuting personal car fleet. Commuting cost decreases by 38%, and daily vehicle utilization increases from 14 to 92 min When using internal combustion engine aTaxis, energy consumption, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and SO2 emissions are respectively 16, 25, and 10% higher than conventional solo commuting, mainly because of unoccupied repositioning between trips. Given the emission intensity of the local electricity grid, the environmental impacts of electric aTaxis do not show significant improvement over conventional vehicles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000469

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using autonomous shared vehicles alone could increase total vehicle-miles traveled and do not necessarily lead to lower emissions if vehicles have internal combustion engines or dirty electricity.

    “However, using autonomous shared vehicles alone could increase the total vehicle-miles traveled and therefore do not necessarily lead to lower emissions as long as the vehicles have internal combustion engines (or electrical engines on a "dirty" electrical grid) [131,495].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [495]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, M., Taiebat, M., Xu, M., & Hsu, S.-C.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Hsu, Shu-Chien
Venue
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Published
2018-12
Volume
144
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0733-9488 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5444
OpenAlex
W2885711151
Cited by
62
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Urban Planning and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Keywords
autonomous taxis, autonomous vehicles, urban commuting, travel cost, vehicle fleet size, vehicle utilization, greenhouse gas emissions, sulfur dioxide emissions, energy consumption, electric vehicles, vehicle repositioning, agent-based modeling, Ann Arbor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review