Cited by 12Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Deep learning opens up protein science’s next frontiers

Open access
Miller, Johanna L.·2021·Physics Today

Abstract

Computer models can now provide stunningly accurate predictions of proteins’ three-dimensional structures. But what about their biological functions?

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/pt.3.4850

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, J. L.
Corresponding author
Miller, Johanna L.
Venue
Physics Today
Published
2021-10-01
Volume
74
Issue
10
Pages
14-17
ISSN
  • 0031-9228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0699
OpenAlex
W3202403471
Cited by
12
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 9 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Physics Today (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein function prediction, protein structure prediction, deep learning, protein science, biological function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review