Cited by 55Gender, Feminism, and MediaStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Non-consensual sexting: characteristics and motives of youths who share received-intimate content without consent

Open access
Barrense-Dias, Yara, Akre, Christina, Auderset, Diane, Leeners, Brigitte, Morselli, Davide, Surís, Joan-Carles·2020·Sexual Health

Abstract

Background: One of the possible negative consequences of sexting is the non-consensual sharing of received-intimate content. This study aimed to determine the characteristics and motives of youths who shared received-intimate images without consent. Methods: Data were obtained from a self-administrated Swiss survey on sexual behaviours among young adults (aged 24–26 years). Out of the 7142 participants, 5175 responded to the question ‘Have you ever shared (forwarding or showing) a sexy photograph/video of someone else (known or unknown) without consent’?; 85% had never shared (Never), 6% had shared once (Once) and 9% had shared several times (Several). Data are presented as relative risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Participants who had shared received-intimate content without consent had higher odds of being male [2.73 (2.14–3.47)], foreign-born [1.45 (1.04–2.03)], reporting a non-heterosexual orientation [1.46 (1.10–1.93)], having sent one’s own intimate image [1.76 (1.32–2.34)] and receiving a shared-intimate image of someone unknown [4.56 (3.28–6.36)] or known [2.76 (1.52–5.01)] compared with participants who had never shared. The main reported motivations were for fun (62%), showing off (30%) and failure to realise what they were doing (9%). Conclusions: Given the reported motivations, it appears crucial to remind youths of the seriousness of non-consensual sharing. Although females may also be perpetrators, the behaviour was more prevalent among males. Prevention and education need to consider a broad range of young people in their scenarios. Even if a particular focus on understanding and preventing males’ perpetration must be considered, overall perpetration, including female’s, must be discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/sh19201

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Men were more likely to share an intimate image to 'show off' to other young men.

    “Men were more likely to share an intimate image to “show off” to other young men.”

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Barrense-Dias et al. (2020)

  • Barrense-Dias et al. (2020) found 54.4% of respondents who had nonconsensually shared once, and 66.3% who had done so several times, did so 'for fun or as a joke.'

    “Barrense-Dias et al. (2020) found that 54.4% of their respondents who had nonconsensually shared an intimate image once, and 66.3% of respondents who had done so several times, did so “for fun or as a joke.””

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Barrense-Dias et al. (2020)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. [2]Crimmins DM, Seigfried-Spellar KC. Peer attachment, sexual experiences, and risky online behaviors as predictors of sexting behaviors among undergraduate students. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;32:268-75.
  2. [5]Eraker EC. Stemming sexting: sensible legal approaches to teenagers' exchange of selfproduced pornography. Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 2010;25:555-96.
  3. [6]Madigan S, Ly A, Rash CL, Van Ouytsel J, Temple JR. Prevalence of Multiple Forms of Sexting Behavior Among Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(4):327-35.
  4. [9]Barrense-Dias Y, Berchtold A, Surís J-C, Akre C. Sexting and the Definition Issue. J Adolesc Health. 2017;61:544-54.
  5. [10]Döring N. Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology. 2014;8:1-13.
  6. [11]Klettke B, Hallford DJ, Mellor DJ. Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014;34:44-53.
  7. [12]Chalfen R. Commentary Sexting as Adolescent Social Communication. Journal of Children and Media. 2010;4:350-4.
  8. [13]Levine D. Sexting: a terrifying health risk ... or the new normal for young adults? J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:257-8.
  9. [14]Lim S. On mobile communication and youth 'deviance': Beyond moral, media and mobile panics. Mobile Media & Communication. 2013;1:96-101.
  10. [17]Van Ouytsel J, Walrave M, Ponnet K. Adolescent sexting research: The challenges ahead. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172:405-6.
  11. [18]Henry N, Powell A. Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence: A Literature Review of Empirical Research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2016;19(2):195-208.
  12. [20]Morelli M, Bianchi D, Baiocco R, Pezzuti L, Chirumbolo A. Not-allowed sharing of sexts and dating violence from the perpetrator's perspective: The moderation role of sexism. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;56:163-9.
  13. [23]Marganski A, Melander L. Intimate Partner Violence Victimization in the Cyber and Real World: Examining the Extent of Cyber Aggression Experiences and Its Association With In-Person Dating Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2015;33(7):1071-95.
  14. [25]Salter M, Crofts T, Lee M. Beyond criminalisation and responsibilisation: Sexting, gender and young people. Current Issues in Criminal Justice. 2013;24(3):301-16.
  15. [29]Morselli D, Berchtold A, Suris J-C, Berchtold A. On-line life history calendar and sensitive topics: A pilot study. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;58:141-9.
  16. [30]Martyn KK, Saftner MA, Darling-Fisher CS, Schell MC. Sexual risk assessment using event history calendars with male and female adolescents. Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners. 2013;27(6):460-9.
  17. [32]Berg-Kelly K, Erdes L. Self-assessment of sexual maturity by mid-adolescents based on a global question. Acta Paediatrica. 1997;86(1):10-7.
  18. [33]Priebe G, Svedin CG. Operationalization of three dimensions of sexual orientation in a national survey of late adolescents. Journal of sex research. 2013;50(8):727-38.
  19. [34]Coker TR, Austin SB, Schuster MA. The health and health care of lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. Annual review of public health. 2010;31:457-77.
  20. [35]Reed E, Salazar M, Raj A. Nonconsensual Sexting and the Role of Sex DifferencesNonconsensual SextingLetters. JAMA Pediatrics. 2018;172(9):890-.
  21. [36]Strassberg DS, Rullo JE, Mackaronis JE. The sending and receiving of sexually explicit cell phone photos ('Sexting') while in high school: One college's students' retrospective reports. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014;41:177-83.
  22. [37]Strassberg DS, McKinnon RK, Sustaita MA, Rullo J. Sexting by high school students: an exploratory and descriptive study. Archives of sexual behavior. 2013;42(1):15-21.
  23. [38]Wood M, Barter C, Stanley N, Aghtaie N, Larkins C. Images across Europe: The sending and receiving of sexual images and associations with interpersonal violence in young people's relationships. Children and Youth Services Review. 2015;59:149-60.
  24. [41]Morelli M, Bianchi D, Baiocco R, Pezzuti L, Chirumbolo A. Sexting, psychological distress and dating violence among adolescents and young adults. Psicothema. 2016;28(2):13742.
  25. [42]Yeung TH, Horyniak DR, Vella AM, Hellard ME, Lim MS. Prevalence, correlates and attitudes towards sexting among young people in Melbourne, Australia. Sexual health. 2014;11(4):332-9.
  26. [43]Burkett M. Sex(t) Talk: A Qualitative Analysis of Young Adults' Negotiations of the Pleasures and Perils of Sexting. Sexuality & Culture. 2015;19(4):835-63.
  27. [45]Lippman JR, Campbell SW. Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't…If You're a Girl: Relational and Normative Contexts of Adolescent Sexting in the United States. J Child Media. 2014;8:371-86.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrense-Dias, Y., Akre, C., Auderset, D., Leeners, B., Morselli, D., & Surís, J.-C.
Affiliations
  • AResearch Group on Adolescent Health (GRSA), Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Route de la Corniche 10, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Centre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne (CH)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
Venue
Sexual Health
Published
2020-06-29
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
270-278
ISSN
  • 1448-5028 (ISSN-L)
  • 1449-8987
OpenAlex
W3037765120
Cited by
55
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexual Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (162538)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
sexting, young adults, sexual behavior, perpetrators, motivations for sharing, sexual orientation, gender differences, immigrant youth, intimate image sharing, sexual health prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review