Cited by 228Stalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesGender, Feminism, and Media

A systematic review of the current knowledge regarding revenge pornography and non-consensual sharing of sexually explicit media

Open access
Walker, Kate, Sleath, Emma·2017·Aggression and Violent Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.010

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on IBSA perpetration prevalence, motivations, and characteristics remains limited.

    “Research on IBSA perpetration prevalence, motivations, and characteristics remains limited, despite the importance of investigating the drivers and characteristics of perpetration, which can help shape interventions for detecting, preventing, and responding to this problem.”

    From Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Walker & Sleath, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 110 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, K., & Sleath, E.
Affiliations
Coventry University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Walker, Kate
  • Sleath, Emma
Venue
Aggression and Violent Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
36
Pages
9-24
ISSN
1359-1789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2732379274
Cited by
227
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aggression and Violent Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
revenge porn, sexually explicit media, victimization rates, gender differences, cyberbullying, online sexual harassment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review