Cited by 288Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementFire dynamics and safety research

Predicting spatial patterns of fire on a southern California landscape

Syphard, Alexandra D., Radeloff, Volker C., Keuler, Nicholas S., Taylor, Robert S., Hawbaker, Todd J., Stewart, Susan I., Clayton, Murray K.·2008·International Journal of Wildland Fire

Abstract

Humans influence the frequency and spatial pattern of fire and contribute to altered fire regimes, but fuel loading is often the only factor considered when planning management activities to reduce fire hazard. Understanding both the human and biophysical landscape characteristics that explain how fire patterns vary should help to identify where fire is most likely to threaten values at risk. We used human and biophysical explanatory variables to model and map the spatial patterns of both fire ignitions and fire frequency in the Santa Monica Mountains, a human-dominated southern California landscape. Most fires in the study area are caused by humans, and our results showed that fire ignition patterns were strongly influenced by human variables. In particular, ignitions were most likely to occur close to roads, trails, and housing development but were also related to vegetation type. In contrast, biophysical variables related to climate and terrain (January temperature, transformed aspect, elevation, and slope) explained most of the variation in fire frequency. Although most ignitions occur close to human infrastructure, fires were more likely to spread when located farther from urban development. How far fires spread was ultimately related to biophysical variables, and the largest fires in southern California occurred as a function of wind speed, topography, and vegetation type. Overlaying predictive maps of fire ignitions and fire frequency may be useful for identifying high-risk areas that can be targeted for fire management actions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/wf07087

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Syphard, A. D., Radeloff, V. C., Keuler, N. S., Taylor, R. S., Hawbaker, T. J., Stewart, S. I., & Clayton, M. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • National Park Service (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Syphard, Alexandra D.
Venue
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Published
2008-10-03
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
602-613
ISSN
  • 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-5516
OpenAlex
W2075785519
Cited by
288
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Wildland Fire (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Geological Survey
  • National Park Service
  • Pacific Northwest Research Station
  • Northern Research Station
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire dynamics and safety research
Keywords
fire frequency, human-caused fires, fire spread, fire hazard, Santa Monica Mountains, human infrastructure, roads and trails, housing development, vegetation types, topography, wind speed, climate, fire management planning, high-risk areas, Southern California

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review