Cited by 33Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementDisaster Management and Resilience

Driving factors of fire density can spatially vary at the local scale in south-eastern France

Open access
Ganteaume, Anne, Long-Fournel, Marlène·2015·International Journal of Wildland Fire

Abstract

South-eastern France is the most wildfire-prone region of the country. To identify the main driving factors in fire density (defined as the number of fires per hectare) at the local scale (clusters of communities that are homogeneous in terms of land cover, climate and wildland–urban interface (WUI)) and to assess their spatial variation at this scale, fire density was investigated in the département Bouches du Rhône using geo-referenced fire ignitions. To assess relationships between fire density and explanatory factors, statistical analyses and spatial evaluation were performed on each cluster taking into account climatic conditions, topography, land cover, WUI (defined as a buffer of 100 m around housing located less than 200 m from natural vegetation), minor road and population densities, with fire density as the dependent variable. High fire density was mainly related to high proportion of WUI in the study area. The proportion of natural vegetation and steep slope were also among the most important drivers of fire density. Depending on the cluster, some biophysical factors can in turn enhance or mitigate fire density but coolest and wettest climate conditions related to highest elevations as well as low housing density always mitigated fire density. This work showed that, at the local scale, the identification of factors driving fire density could improve fire prevention because this would enable the factors to be better targeted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/wf13209

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thomas and Butry used NFIRS data to estimate that between 2002 and 2006, an annual average of 1248 structures were damaged at an estimated loss of $160.2 million.

    “A paper by Thomas and Butry used NFIRS data to estimate that between 2002 and 2006, an annual average of 1248 structures were damaged at an estimated loss of $160.2 million.84”

    From The costs and losses of wildfires: a literature survey (2017) · cites this paper as [84]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ganteaume, A., & Long-Fournel, M.
Affiliations
  • AIrstea, UR EMAX, 3275 route de Cézanne, CS 40061, 13182 Aix-en-Provence, France.
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
Venue
International Journal of Wildland Fire
Published
2015-06-15
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
650-664
ISSN
  • 1049-8001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-5516
OpenAlex
W2259375520
Cited by
33
References
55
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Wildland Fire (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Cemadoc (Cemagref / IRSTEA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
Keywords
fire density, forest fires, wildland-urban interface, fire ignition, land cover, topography, natural vegetation, climate, population density, road density, fire prevention, Bouches-du-Rhône

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review