CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 322DNA Repair MechanismsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFungal and yeast genetics research

Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks

Open access
Michel, Bénédicte, Grompone, Gianfranco, Florès, Maria-Jose, Bidnenko, Vladimir·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0401586101PMC PMC516472
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Impairment of replication fork progression is a serious threat to living organisms and a potential source of genome instability. Studies in prokaryotes have provided evidence that inactivated replication forks can restart by the reassembly of the replication machinery. Several strategies for the processing of inactivated replication forks before replisome reassembly have been described. Most of these require the action of recombination proteins, with different proteins being implicated, depending on the cause of fork arrest. The action of recombination proteins at blocked forks is not necessarily accompanied by a strand-exchange reaction and may prevent rather than repair fork breakage. These various restart pathways may reflect different structures at stalled forks. We review here the different strategies of fork processing elicited by different kinds of replication impairments in prokaryotes and the variety of roles played by recombination proteins in these processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0401586101

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. [1]Kogoma, T. (1997) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61, 212–238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]Sandler, S. J. & Marians, K. J. (2000) J. Bacteriol. 182, 9–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Xu, L. & Marians, K. J. (2003) Mol. Cell 11, 817–826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [4]Kraus, E., Leung, W. Y. & Haber, J. E. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8255–8262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [5]Ira, G. & Haber, J. E. (2002) Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 6384–6392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [6]Higgins, N. P., Kato, K. & Strauss, B. (1976) J. Mol. Biol. 101, 417–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. [7]Tatsumi, K. & Strauss, B. (1978) Nucleic Acids Res. 5, 331–347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. [8]Seigneur, M., Bidnenko, V., Ehrlich, S. D. & Michel, B. (1998) Cell 95, 419–430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. [9]Michel, B., Flores, M. J., Viguera, E., Grompone, G., Seigneur, M. & Bidnenko, V. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8181–8188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. [10]Kuzminov, A. (1999) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63, 751–813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. [11]Taylor, A. F. & Smith, G. R. (2003) Nature 423, 889–893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. [12]Dillingham, M. S., Spies, M. & Kowalczykowski, S. C. (2003) Nature 423, 893–897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. [13]Spies, M., Bianco, P. R., Dillingham, M. S., Handa, N., Baskin, R. J. & Kowalczykowski, S. C. (2003) Cell 114, 647–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. [14]Whitby, M. C., Vincent, S. D. & Lloyd, R. G. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 5220–5228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. [15]West, S. C. (1997) Annu. Rev. Genet. 31, 213–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. [16]Sandler, S. J., Samra, H. S. & Clark, A. J. (1996) Genetics 143, 5–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. [17]Kogoma, T., Cadwell, G. W., Barnard, K. G. & Asai, T. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 1258–1264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. [18]Flores, M. J., Bierne, H., Ehrlich, S. D. & Michel, B. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 619–629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. [19]Grompone, G., Seigneur, M., Ehrlich, S. D. & Michel, B. (2002) Mol. Microbiol. 44, 1331–1339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. [20]Gruss, A. & Michel, B. (2001) Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 4, 595–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. [21]Flores, M. J., Ehrlich, S. D. & Michel, B. (2002) Mol. Microbiol. 44, 783–792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. [22]Paques, F. & Haber, J. E. (1999) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63, 349–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. [23]Prado, F., Cortes-Ledesma, F., Huertas, P. & Aguilera, A. (2003) Curr. Genet. 42, 185–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. [24]Seigneur, M., Ehrlich, S. D. & Michel, B. (2000) Mol. Microbiol. 38, 565–574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. [25]Robu, M. E., Inman, R. B. & Cox, M. M. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8211–8218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. [26]Morimatsu, K. & Kowalczykowski, S. C. (2003) Mol. Cell. 11, 1337–1347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. [27]Postow, L., Ullsperger, C., Keller, R. W., Bustamante, C., Vologodskii, A. V. & Cozzarelli, N. R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 2790–2796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. [28]Olavarrieta, L., MartinezRobles, M. L., Sogo, J. M., Stasiak, A., Hernandez, P., Krimer, D. B. & Schvartzman, J. B. (2002) Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 656–666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. [29]Liu, L. F. & Wang, J. C. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 7024–7027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. [30]Khodursky, A. B., Peter, B. J., Schmidt, M. B., DeRisi, J., Botstein, D., Brown, P. O. & Cozzarelli, N. R. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9419–9424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. [31]Grompone, G., Ehrlich, S. D. & Michel, B. (2003) Mol. Microbiol. 48, 845–854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. [32]Levine, C., Hiasa, H. & Marians, K. J. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1400, 29–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. [33]Postow, L., Peter, B. J. & Cozzarelli, N. B. (1999) BioEssays 21, 805–808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. [34]Bidnenko, V., Ehrlich, S. D. & Michel, B. (2002) EMBO J. 21, 3898–3907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. [36]Kuzminov, A. (1995) Mol. Microbiol. 16, 373–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. [37]Kuzminov, A. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8241–8246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. [38]Setlow, R. B., Swenson, P. A. & Carrier, W. L. (1963) Science 142, 1464–1466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. [39]Khidhir, M. A., Casaregola, S. & Holland, I. B. (1985) Mol. Gen. Genet. 199, 133–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. [40]Witkin, E. M. (1991) Biochimie 73, 133–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. [41]Courcelle, J., CarswellCrumpton, C. & Hanawalt, P. C. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3714–3719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. [42]Rangarajan, S., Woodgate, R. & Goodman, M. F. (2002) Mol. Microbiol. 43, 617–628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. [43]Chow, K. H. & Courcelle, J. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 3492–3496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. [44]Courcelle, J. & Hanawalt, P. C. (2003) Annu. Rev. Genet. 37, 611–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. [45]Wang, T. C. & Smith, K. C. (1983) J. Bacteriol. 156, 1093–1098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. [46]Rupp, W. D. & Howard-Flanders, P. (1968) J. Mol. Biol. 31, 291–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. [47]Wang, T. C. & Smith, K. C. (1986) Mutat. Res. 165, 39–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. [48]McPartland, A., Green, L. & Echols, H. (1980) Cell 20, 731–737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. [49]Sommer, S., Boudsocq, F., Devoret, R. & Bailone, A. (1998) Mol. Microbiol. 28, 281–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. [50]Pham, P., Bertram, J. G., ODonnell, M., Woodgate, R. & Goodman, M. F. (2001) Nature 409, 366–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. [51]Donaldson, J. R., Courcelle, C. T. & Courcelle, J. (2004) Genetics 166, 1631–1640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. [52]Pages, V. & Fuchs, R. P. (2003) Science 300, 1300–1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. [53]Higuchi, K., Katayama, T., Iwai, S., Hidaka, M., Horiuchi, T. & Maki, H. (2003) Genes Cells 8, 437–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. [54]McGlynn, P. & Lloyd, R. G. (2000) Cell 101, 35–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. [55]McGlynn, P., Lloyd, R. G. & Marians, K. J. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8235–8240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. [56]Robu, M. E., Inman, R. B. & Cox, M. M. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 10973–10981. [DOI] [PubMed]
  56. [57]McGlynn, P. & Lloyd, R. G. (2002) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 3, 859–870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. [58]Marians, K. J. (2000) Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 185–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. [59]Grompone, G., Ehrlich, S. D. & Michel, B. (2004) EMBO Rep. 5, 607–612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. [60]Beam, C. E., Saveson, C. J. & Lovett, S. T. (2002) J. Bacteriol. 184, 6836–6844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. [61]Grigorian, A. V., Lustig, R. B., Guzman, E. C., Mahaffy, J. M. & Zyskind, J. W. (2003) J. Bacteriol. 185, 630–644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. [62]Simmons, L. A., Breier, A. M., Cozzarelli, N. R. & Kaguni, J. M. (2004) Mol. Microbiol. 51, 349–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. [63]Schapiro, J. M., Libby, S. J. & Fang, F. C. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8496–8501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. [64]Nyberg, K. A., Michelson, R. J., Putnam, C. W. & Weinert, T. A. (2002) Annu. Rev. Genet. 36, 617–656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. [65]Longhese, M. P., Clerici, M. & Lucchini, G. (2003) Mutat. Res. 532, 41–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. [66]Kai, M. & Wang, T. S. (2003) Mutat. Res. 532, 59–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. [67]Michel, B. (2000) Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 173–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. [68]Kolodner, R. D., Putnam, C. D. & Myung, K. (2002) Science 297, 552–557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. [69]Michel, B., Ehrlich, S. D. & Uzest, M. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 430–438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. [70]Sogo, J. M., Lopes, M. & Foiani, M. (2002) Science 297, 599–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Michel, B., Grompone, G., Florès, M.-J., & Bidnenko, V.
Affiliations
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • Laboratoire de Génétique Microbienne, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 78352 Jouy en Josas Cedex, France
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-08-24
Volume
101
Issue
35
Pages
12783-12788
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.0401586101
PMC
PMC516472
OpenAlex
W2114809602
Cited by
322
References
71
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
replication fork restart, stalled replication forks, recombination proteins, genomic instability, strand exchange
MeSH terms
Bacteria, DNA, DNA Repair, DNA Replication, Mutation, DNA Gyrase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review