Cited by 497Liver physiology and pathologyHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Met provides essential signals for liver regeneration

Open access
Borowiak, Malgorzata, Garratt, Alistair N., Wüstefeld, Torsten, Strehle, Michael, Trautwein, Christian, Birchmeier, Carmen·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Genetic analysis in mice has demonstrated a crucial role of the Met tyrosine kinase receptor and its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF), in development of the liver, muscle, and placenta. Here, we use conditional mutagenesis in mice to analyze the function of Met during liver regeneration, using the Mx-cre transgene to introduce the mutation in the adult. After partial hepatectomy in mice carrying the Mx-cre -induced Met mutation, regeneration of the liver is impaired. Comparison of signal transduction pathways in control and mutant livers indicates that Met and other signaling receptors cooperate to fully activate particular signaling molecules, for instance, the protein kinase Akt. However, activation of the Erk1/2 kinase during liver regeneration depends exclusively on Met. Signaling crosstalk is thus an important aspect of the regulation of liver regeneration. Analysis of cell cycle progression of hepatocytes in conditional Met mutant mice indicates a defective exit from quiescence and diminished entry into S phase. Impaired liver regeneration is accompanied by compensatory physiological responses that include prolonged up-regulation of HGF/SF and IL-6 in peripheral blood. Our data demonstrate that the HGF/SF/Met signaling system is essential not only during liver development but also for the regeneration of the organ in the adult.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0403412101

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Whole body MET knockout animals display a marked elevation of IL-6 following PHx compared to wild type controls.

    “Borowiak et al. reported that whole body MET knockout animals do display a marked elevation of IL-6 following PHx when compared to their wild type controls [22].”

    From Synthesis of IL-6 by Hepatocytes Is a Normal Response to Common Hepatic Stimuli (2014) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Results report that circulating IL-6 remained much elevated after partial hepatectomy in conditional Met mutant mice compared with controls. But the study used an inducible mutation in the adult liver, not a whole-body Met knockout; the Abstract notes that Met−/− embryos die during gestation. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mice with hepatocellular-targeted deletion of MET have a high death rate at 48 h following PHx, whereas mice with whole body deletion of MET survive.

    “Mice with hepatocellular-targeted deletion of MET are reported to have a high death rate at 48 h following PHx whereas surprisingly, mice with a whole body deletion of the receptor have been reported to survive [21], [22].”

    From Synthesis of IL-6 by Hepatocytes Is a Normal Response to Common Hepatic Stimuli (2014) · cites this paper as [22]

    Materials and Methods reports that 95% of conditional Met mutant mice died within 2–3 days of partial hepatectomy under one surgical procedure, but 85% survived under a modified procedure; the high death rate is therefore procedure-dependent, not an unqualified outcome at 48 hours. Results reports that mice with whole-body Met deletion died during gestation, so this paper does not support their reported survival. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. [1]Park, M., Dean, M., Cooper, C. S., Schmidt, M., O'Brien, S. J., Blair, D. G. & Vande Woude, G. F. (1986) Cell 45, 895–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]Bottaro, D. P., Rubin, J. S., Faletto, D. L., Chan, A. M., Kmiecik, T. E., Vande Woude, G. F. & Aaronson, S. A. (1991) Science 251, 802–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Stoker, M., Gherardi, E., Perryman, M. & Gray, J. (1987) Nature 327, 239–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [4]Nakamura, T., Nishizawa, T., Hagiya, M., Seki, T., Shimonishi, M., Sugimura, A., Tashiro, K. & Shimizu, S. (1989) Nature 342, 440–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [5]Miyazawa, K., Tsubouchi, H., Naka, D., Takahashi, K., Okigaki, M., Arakaki, N., Nakayama, H., Hirono, S., Sakiyama, O., Takahashi, K., et al. (1989) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 163, 967–973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [6]Zarnegar, R. & Michalopoulos, G. (1989) Cancer Res. 49, 3314–3320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. [7]Sachs, M., Brohmann, H., Zechner, D., Müller, T., Hülsken, J., Walther, I., Schaeper, U., Birchmeier, C. & Birchmeier, W. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 150, 1375–1384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. [8]Ponzetto, C., Bardelli, A., Zhen, Z., Maina, F., dalla Zonca, P., Giordano, S., Graziani, A., Panayotou, G. & Comoglio, P. M. (1994) Cell 77, 261–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. [9]Birchmeier, C., Birchmeier, W., Gherardi, E. & Vande Woude, G. F. (2003) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 915–925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. [10]Paumelle, R., Tulasne, D., Kherrouche, Z., Plaza, S., Leroy, C., Reveneau, S., Vandenbunder, B., Fafeur, V. & Tulashe, D. (2002) Oncogene 21, 2309–2319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. [11]Taub, R. (1996) FASEB J. 10, 413–427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. [12]Michalopoulos, G. K. & DeFrances, M. C. (1997) Science 276, 60–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. [13]Fausto, N. (2000) J. Hepatol. 32, 19–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. [14]Cressman, D. E., Greenbaum, L. E., DeAngelis, R. A., Ciliberto, G., Furth, E. E., Poli, V. & Taub, R. (1996) Science 274, 1379–1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. [15]Servillo, G., Penna, L., Foulkes, N. S., Magni, M. V., Della Fazia, M. A. & Sassone-Corsi, P. (1997) Oncogene 14, 1601–1606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. [16]Behrens, A., Sibilia, M., David, J. P., Mohle-Steinlein, U., Tronche, F., Schutz, G. & Wagner, E. F. (2002) EMBO J. 21, 1782–1790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. [17]Fan, G., Xu, R., Wessendorf, M. W., Ma, X., Kren, B. T. & Steer, C. J. (1995) Cell Growth Differ. 6, 1463–1476. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. [18]Spiewak-Rinaudo, J. A. & Thorgeirsson, S. S. (1997) Cell Growth Differ. 8, 301–309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. [19]Steer, C. J. (1995) FASEB J. 9, 1396–1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. [20]Heim, M. H., Gamboni, G., Beglinger, C. & Gyr, K. (1997) Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 27, 948–955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. [21]Sherr, C. J. & Roberts, J. M. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 1149–1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. [22]Weinberg, R. A. (1995) Cell 81, 323–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. [23]Trimarchi, J. M. & Lees, J. A. (2002) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 11–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. [24]Shiota, G., Wang, T. C., Nakamura, T. & Schmidt, E. V. (1994) Hepatology 19, 962–972. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. [25]Kiso, S., Kawata, S., Tamura, S., Inui, Y., Yoshida, Y., Sawai, Y., Umeki, S., Ito, N., Yamada, A., Miyagawa, J., et al. (2003) Gastroenterology 124, 701–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. [26]Yamada, Y., Kirillova, I., Peschon, J. J. & Fausto, N. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1441–1446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. [27]Wüstefeld, T., Klein, C., Streetz, K. L., Betz, U., Lauber, J., Buer, J., Manns, M. P., Muller, W. & Trautwein, C. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 11281–11288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. [28]Albrecht, J. H., Poon, R. Y., Ahonen, C. L., Rieland, B. M., Deng, C. & Crary, G. S. (1998) Oncogene 16, 2141–2150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. [29]Li, W., Liang, X., Kellendonk, C., Poli, V. & Taub, R. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 28411–28417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. [30]Schmidt, C., Bladt, F., Goedecke, S., Brinkmann, V., Zschiesche, W., Sharpe, M., Gherardi, E. & Birchmeier, C. (1995) Nature 373, 699–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. [31]Uehara, Y., Minowa, O., Mori, C., Shiota, K., Kuno, J., Noda, T. & Kitamura, N. (1995) Nature 373, 702–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. [32]Bladt, F., Riethmacher, D., Isenmann, S., Aguzzi, A. & Birchmeier, C. (1995) Nature 376, 768–771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. [33]Kühn, R., Schwenk, F., Aguet, M. & Rajewsky, K. (1995) Science 269, 1427–1429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. [34]Clark, G. (1981) in Staining Procedures, ed. Clark, G. (Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore), pp. 171–217.
  35. [35]Hartmann, G., Prospero, T., Brinkmann, V., Özcelik, C., Winter, G., Hepple, J., Batley, S., Bladt, F., Sachs, M., Birchmeier, C., et al. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 125–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. [36]Schwenk, F., Baron, U. & Rajewsky, K. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 5080–5081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. [37]Braunwald. E., Fauci, A., Kasper, D., Hauser, S. & Jameson, D. J. (1998) Hepatic Steatosis (Fatty Liver) and Steatohepatitis (McGraw–Hill, New York).
  38. [38]Nakamura, T., Mizuno, S., Matsumoto, K., Sawa, Y. & Matsuda, H. (2000) J. Clin. Invest. 106, 1511–1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. [39]Matsumoto, K. & Nakamura, T. (2001) Kidney Int. 59, 2023–2038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. [40]Rabkin, R., Fervenza, F., Tsao, T., Sibley, R., Friedlaender, M., Hsu, F., Lassman, C., Hausmann, M., Huie, P. & Schwall, R. H. (2001) J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 12, 531–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. [41]Jin, H., Yang, R., Li, W., Ogasawara, A. K., Schwall, R., Eberhard, D. A., Zheng, Z., Kahn, D. & Paoni, N. F. (2003) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 304, 654–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. [42]Picard, C., Lambotte, L., Starkel, P., Sempoux, C., Saliez, A., Van den Berge, V. & Horsmans, Y. (2002) J. Hepatol. 36, 645–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. [43]Greenbaum, L. E., Li, W., Cressman, D. E., Peng, Y., Ciliberto, G., Poli, V. & Taub, R. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 102, 996–1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. [44]Sakamoto, T., Liu, Z., Murase, N., Ezure, T., Yokomuro, S., Poli, V. & Demetris, A. J. (1999) Hepatology 29, 403–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. [45]DeGregori, J., Kowalik, T. & Nevins, J. R. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4215–4224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. [46]Macleod, K. F., Sherry, N., Hannon, G., Beach, D., Tokino, T., Kinzler, K., Vogelstein, B. & Jacks, T. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 935–944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. [47]Torbenson, M., Yang, S. Q., Liu, H. Z., Huang, J., Gage, W. & Diehl, A. M. (2002) Am. J. Pathol. 161, 155–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. [48]Boccaccio, C., Gaudino, G., Gambarotta, G., Galimi, F. & Comoglio, P. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 12846–12851. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. [49]Ito, E., Nomura, N. & Narayanan, R. (1990) Cell Regul. 1, 347–357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. [50]Spector, M. S., Auer, K. L., Jarvis, W. D., Ishac, E. J., Gao, B., Kunos, G. & Dent, P. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3556–3565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. [51]Giordano, V., De Falco, G., Chiari, R., Quinto, I., Pelicci, P. G., Bartholomew, L., Delmastro, P., Gadina, M. & Scala, G. (1997) J. Immunol. 158, 4097–4103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borowiak, M., Garratt, A. N., Wüstefeld, T., Strehle, M., Trautwein, C., & Birchmeier, C.
Affiliations
Max Delbrück Center (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-07-12
Volume
101
Issue
29
Pages
10608-10613
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2061863220
Cited by
497
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 33
FWCI
15.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
MET receptor tyrosine kinase, hepatocyte growth factor, liver regeneration, partial hepatectomy, conditional mutagenesis, Akt signaling, ERK signaling, signaling crosstalk, hepatocyte cell cycle, quiescence exit, interleukin-6, liver development
MeSH terms
Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta, Animals, Cell Cycle, DNA-Binding Proteins, Hepatectomy, Liver, Liver Regeneration, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Signal Transduction, Trans-Activators, Interleukin-6, Hepatocyte Growth Factor, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Cell Cycle Proteins, Transgenes, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review