The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular analysis reveals tighter social regulation of immigration in patrilocal populations than in matrilocal populations.
Abstract
Human social organization can deeply affect levels of genetic diversity. This fact implies that genetic information can be used to study social structures, which is the basis of ethnogenetics. Recently, methods have been developed to extract this information from genetic data gathered from subdivided populations that have gone through recent spatial expansions, which is typical of most human populations. Here, we perform a Bayesian analysis of mitochondrial and Y chromosome diversity in three matrilocal and three patrilocal groups from northern Thailand to infer the number of males and females arriving in these populations each generation and to estimate the age of their range expansion. We find that the number of male immigrants is 8 times smaller in patrilocal populations than in matrilocal populations, whereas women move 2.5 times more in patrilocal populations than in matrilocal populations. In addition to providing genetic quantification of sex-specific dispersal rates in human populations, we show that although men and women are exchanged at a similar rate between matrilocal populations, there are far fewer men than women moving into patrilocal populations. This finding is compatible with the hypothesis that men are strictly controlling male immigration and promoting female immigration in patrilocal populations and that immigration is much less regulated in matrilocal populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While an influence of post-marital residence on the migration rate of women and men has already been widely proposed [14]–[17] (see also Table 1), the factors that may locally affect the effective number of women, relatively to that of men, are not well recognized.”
From Sex-Specific Genetic Structure and Social Organization in Central Asia: Insights from a Multi-Locus Study (2008) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“It is also noteworthy that the absolute difference between male and female genetic structure is more pronounced in patrilocal than in matrilocal populations [16].”
From Sex-Specific Genetic Structure and Social Organization in Central Asia: Insights from a Multi-Locus Study (2008) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“These studies have shown that in patrilocal populations, genetic differentiation is stronger among men than among women, while the reverse is observed in matrilocal populations.”
From Sex-Specific Genetic Structure and Social Organization in Central Asia: Insights from a Multi-Locus Study (2008) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 10.1016/S0002-9297(07)62955-3 · DOI
- 10.1086/302749 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.071036898 · DOI
- 10.1086/386292 · DOI
- 10.1038/27103 · DOI
- 10.1038/3088 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/302451 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/316949 · DOI
- 10.1086/316890 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003906 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ng1428 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.95.25.15140 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10597 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng711 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/msg009 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02004.x · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/162.4.2025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026091 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/145.2.505 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg1318 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0306899100 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.002141 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/163.3.1177 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00582.x · DOI
- 10.1086/302770 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ng0497-363 · DOI
- 10.1086/380911 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x · DOI
- 10.1086/204474 · DOI · Paper page
- Lebar F. M. Hickey G. C. & Musgrave J. K. (1964) Ethnic Groups of Mainland Southeast Asia (Human Relations Area Files Press New Haven CT).
- 10.1534/genetics.104.034199 · DOI
- 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1302 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/159.2.893 · DOI
- 10.1038/35047064 · DOI
- Rogers, A. R. & Jorde, L. B. (1995) Hum. Biol. 67, 1–36.7721272
- 10.1093/genetics/161.3.1209 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/31.1.39 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.1995.0090 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2004.00092.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/jar.59.1.3631445 · DOI
- 10.1086/382256 · DOI · Paper page
- Foley, R. A. & Lahr, M. M. (2001) in Genes, Fossils, and Behavior, eds. Donnelly, P. & Foley, R. A. (IOS, Amsterdam), Vol. 310, pp. 223–245.
Cited by
Bayesian Computation and Model Selection Without Likelihoods
Leuenberger, C., & Wegmann, D. (2010) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.109.109058 · Cited by 175
Genome-wide analysis indicates more Asian than Melanesian ancestry of Polynesians
Kayser, M., Lao, O., Saar, K., Brauer, S., Wang, X., Nürnberg, P., Trent, R. J., & Stoneking, M. (2008) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.09.010 · Cited by 174
From Social to Genetic Structures in Central Asia
Chaix, R., Quintana-Murci, L., Hegay, T., Hammer, M. F., Mobasher, Z., Austerlitz, F., & Heyer, E. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.058 · Cited by 111
Laval, G., Patin, E., Barreiro, L. B., & Quintana-Murci, L. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010284 · Cited by 93
Ségurel, L., Martínez-Cruz, B., Quintana-Murci, L., Balaresque, P., Georges, M., Hegay, T., Aldashev, A., Nasyrova, F., Jobling, M. A., Heyer, E., et al. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000200 · Cited by 95
Guyon, L., Guez, J., Toupance, B., Heyer, E., & Chaix, R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47618-5 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamilton, G., Stoneking, M., & Excoffier, L.
- Affiliations
- Computational and Molecular Population Genetics Laboratory, Zoological Institute, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; and School of Integrative Biology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2005-05-13
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 7476-7480
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review