Cited by 1,310Climate change and permafrostPolar Research and EcologyEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Plant community responses to experimental warming across the tundra biome

Open access
Walker, Marilyn D., Wahren, C. Henrik, Hollister, Robert D., Henry, Greg H. R., Ahlquist, Lorraine E., Alatalo, Juha M., Bret-Harte, M. Syndonia, Calef, Monika P. +19 more·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Recent observations of changes in some tundra ecosystems appear to be responses to a warming climate. Several experimental studies have shown that tundra plants and ecosystems can respond strongly to environmental change, including warming; however, most studies were limited to a single location and were of short duration and based on a variety of experimental designs. In addition, comparisons among studies are difficult because a variety of techniques have been used to achieve experimental warming and different measurements have been used to assess responses. We used metaanalysis on plant community measurements from standardized warming experiments at 11 locations across the tundra biome involved in the International Tundra Experiment. The passive warming treatment increased plant-level air temperature by 1-3°C, which is in the range of predicted and observed warming for tundra regions. Responses were rapid and detected in whole plant communities after only two growing seasons. Overall, warming increased height and cover of deciduous shrubs and graminoids, decreased cover of mosses and lichens, and decreased species diversity and evenness. These results predict that warming will cause a decline in biodiversity across a wide variety of tundra, at least in the short term. They also provide rigorous experimental evidence that recently observed increases in shrub cover in many tundra regions are in response to climate warming. These changes have important implications for processes and interactions within tundra ecosystems and between tundra and the atmosphere.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0503198103

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changing vegetation diversity, abundance, composition, and phenology in the Arctic are well documented.

    “Changing vegetation diversity, abundance, composition, and phenology in the Arctic are all well documented (Sturm et al. 2001; Walker et al. 2006; Bjørkman et al. 2020).”

    From Muskox status, recent variation, and uncertain future (2020) · cites this paper as Walker et al. 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, M. D., Wahren, C. H., Hollister, R. D., Henry, G. H. R., Ahlquist, L. E., Alatalo, J. M., Bret-Harte, M. S., Calef, M. P., Callaghan, T. V., Carroll, A. B., Epstein, H. E., Jónsdóttir, I. S., Klein, J. A., Magnússon, B., Molau, U., Oberbauer, S. F., Rewa, S. P., Robinson, C. H., Shaver, G. R., Suding, K. N., Thompson, C. C., Tolvanen, A., Totland, Ø., Turner, P. L., Tweedie, C. E., Webber, P. J., & Wookey, P. A.
Affiliations
US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Henry, Greg H. R.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-01-20
Volume
103
Issue
5
Pages
1342-1346
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2167746920
Cited by
1,310
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 93 · 2012: 90
FWCI
31.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks - GVSU (Grand Valley State University) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access Server of the Woods Hole Scientific Community (Woods Hole Scientific Community) (submittedVersion)
  • Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Academy of Finland
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Climate change and permafrost
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Polar Research and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
tundra, experimental warming, global warming, plant community response, shrub expansion, deciduous shrubs, graminoids, mosses and lichens, species diversity, species evenness, International Tundra Experiment, passive warming
MeSH terms
Arctic Regions, Climate, Conservation of Natural Resources, Environment, Environmental Monitoring, Hot Temperature, Models, Theoretical, Plants, Software, Temperature, Genetic Variation, Greenhouse Effect, Ecosystem, Plant Physiological Phenomena, Biomass, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review