Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recognition of peptide–MHC class I complexes by activating killer immunoglobulin-like receptors

Open access
Stewart, C. Andrew, Laugier-Anfossi, Fanny, Vély, Frédéric, Saulquin, Xavier, Riedmuller, Jenifer, Tisserant, Agnès, Gauthier, Laurent, Romagné, François, Ferracci, Géraldine, Arosa, Fernando A., Moretta, Alessandro, Sun, Peter D., Ugolini, Sophie, Vivier, Eric·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Inhibitory receptors for MHC class I molecules increase the threshold of lymphocyte activation. Natural Killer (NK) cells express a large number of such inhibitory receptors, including the human killer Ig-like receptors (KIR). However, activating members of the KIR family have poorly defined ligands and functions. Here we describe the use of activating KIR tetramer reagents as probes to detect their ligands. Infection of cells with Epstein–Barr virus leads to expression of a detectable ligand for the activating receptor KIR2DS1. In this case, KIR2DS1 interacts with up-regulated peptide–MHC class I complexes on Epstein–Barr virus-infected cells in a transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP)-dependent manner. In tetramer-based cellular assays and direct affinity measurements, this interaction with MHC class I is facilitated by a broad spectrum of peptides. KIR2DS1 and its inhibitory homologue, KIR2DL1, share sensitivity to peptide sequence alterations at positions 7 and 8. These results fit a model in which activating and inhibitory receptors recognize the same sets of self-MHC class I molecules, differing only in their binding affinities. Importantly, KIR2DS1 is not always sufficient to trigger NK effector responses when faced with cognate ligand, consistent with fine control during NK cell activation. We discuss how our results for KIR2DS1 and parallel studies on KIR2DS2 relate to the association between activating KIR genes and susceptibility to autoimmune disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0503594102

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Stewart, C. A., Laugier-Anfossi, F., Vély, F., Saulquin, X., Riedmuller, J., Tisserant, A., Gauthier, L., Romagné, F., Ferracci, G., Arosa, F. A., Moretta, A., Sun, P. D., Ugolini, S., & Vivier, E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-09-02
Volume
102
Issue
37
Pages
13224-13229
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2138781831
Cited by
406
References
52
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recognition of peptide–MHC class I complexes by activating killer immunoglobulin-like receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0503594102
The paper
Stewart, C. A., Laugier-Anfossi, F., Vély, F., Saulquin, X., Riedmuller, J., Tisserant, A., Gauthier, L., Romagné, F., Ferracci, G., Arosa, F. A., Moretta, A., Sun, P. D., Ugolini, S., & Vivier, E. (2005). Recognition of peptide–MHC class I complexes by activating killer immunoglobulin-like receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503594102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.