The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decades
Open accessAbstract
If we conduct the same experiment in two laboratories or repeat a classical study many years later, will we obtain the same results? Recent research with mice in neural and behavioral genetics yielded different results in different laboratories for certain phenotypes, and these findings suggested to some researchers that behavior may be too unstable for fine-scale genetic analysis. Here we expand the range of data on this question to additional laboratories and phenotypes, and, for the first time in this field, we formally compare recent data with experiments conducted 30–50 years ago. For ethanol preference and locomotor activity, strain differences have been highly stable over a period of 40–50 years, and most strain correlations are in the range of r = 0.85–0.98, as high as or higher than for brain weight. For anxiety-related behavior on the elevated plus maze, on the other hand, strain means often differ dramatically across laboratories or even when the same laboratory is moved to another site within a university. When a wide range of phenotypes is considered, no inbred strain appears to be exceptionally stable or labile across laboratories in any general sense, and there is no tendency to observe higher correlations among studies done more recently. Phenotypic drift over decades for most of the behaviors examined appears to be minimal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring normal and pathological anxiety-like behaviour in mice: a review
Belzung, C., & Griebel, G. (2001) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00291-1 · Cited by 912
Animal models of ‘anxiety’: Where next?
Rodgers, R. J. (1997) · Behavioural Pharmacology · doi:10.1097/00008877-199711000-00003 · Cited by 437
Wahlsten, D., Metten, P., & Crabbe, J. C. (2003) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(03)02354-0 · Cited by 206
Self-citationIntermale aggression and dark/light preference in ten inbred mouse strains
Guillot, P.-V., & Chapouthier, G. (1996) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(95)00163-8 · Cited by 117
Research works printed but not linked: 55
- 10.1126/science.284.5420.1670 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/80553 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0409554102 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00140.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.101128598 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth299 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng1518 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-349-04904-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/71641 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.6953593 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng0597-19 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s003359900464 · DOI
- 10.1002/neu.10173 · DOI · Paper page
- BJ Winer, DR Brown, KM Michels Statistical Principles in Experimental Design (McGraw-Hill, 3rd Ed, New York, 1991).
- 10.1007/978-3-540-48002-0_2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90188-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/0531-5565(67)90033-2 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.901620408 · DOI
- 10.15288/qjsa.1959.20.691 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0043100 · DOI
- 10.1097/00006842-196607000-00028 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02244901 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0083586 · DOI
- CH Southwick, LH Clark Commun Behav Biol 1, 49–59 (1968).
- 10.1016/S0361-9230(03)00033-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00177912 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02244948 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2004.00109.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.05.018 · DOI
- 10.1007/s002130050038 · DOI · Paper page
- MV Khrapova, NK Popova, DF Avgustinovich Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova 51, 324–328 (2001).
- 10.1016/S0166-4328(03)00107-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/0091-3057(95)02126-4 · DOI · Paper page
- SC Maxson Techniques for the Genetic Analysis of Brain and Behavior: Focus on the Mouse, eds D Goldowitz, D Wahlsten, RE Wimer (Elsevier, Amsterdam), pp. 349–373 (1992).
- 10.1086/physzool.15.4.30151662 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a105080 · DOI
- BE Ginsburg Stimulation in Early Infancy, ed JA Ambrose (Academic, New York), pp. 73–96 (1969).
- 10.1007/BF01071302 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1971.tb00627.x · DOI
- 10.1002/1098-2337(1989)15:5<361::AID-AB2480150505>3.0.CO;2-6 · doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1989)15:5<361::aid-ab2480150505>3.0.co;2-6
- 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2003.0056.x · DOI
- PL Roubertoux, I Le Roy, S Mortaud, F Perez-Diaz, S Tordjman Handbook of Molecular-Genetic Techniques for Brain and Behavior Research, eds WE Crusio, RT Gerlai (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam), pp. 696–709 (1999). · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00145.x · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1025774716976 · DOI
- 10.2337/diab.37.9.1163 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0028715 · doi:10.1037/h0028715
- 10.1101/gr.2825804 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1601-183x.2004.00064.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/neu.10161 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0501632102 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00121.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.06.010 · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.06.010
- 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.031 · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.031
- 10.1038/nn1102-1101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00037-2 · DOI
Cited by
Du Preez, A., Onorato, D., Eiben, I., Musaelyan, K., Egeland, M., Zunszain, P. A., Fernandes, C., Thuret, S., & Pariante, C. M. (2021) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.07.015 · Cited by 285
What's wrong with my mouse model?
Kalueff, A. V., Wheaton, M., & Murphy, D. L. (2007) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2007.01.023 · Cited by 285
Reproducibility and replicability of rodent phenotyping in preclinical studies
Kafkafi, N., Agassi, J., Chesler, E. J., Crabbe, J. C., Crusio, W. E., Eilam, D., Gerlai, R., Golani, I., Gomez-Marin, A., Heller, R., et al. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.01.003 · Cited by 215
Self-citationYang, R. J., Mozhui, K., Karlsson, R.-M., Cameron, H. A., Williams, R. W., & Holmes, A. (2008) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301665 · Cited by 143
Can animal data predict human outcome? Problems and pitfalls of translational animal research
Martić-Kehl, M. I., Schibli, R., & Schubiger, P. A. (2012) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-012-2175-z · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Wahlsten, D., Bachmanov, A., Finn, D. A., & Crabbe, J. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-10-31
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 16364-16369
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2042631675
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decades. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0605342103
- The paper
- Wahlsten, D., Bachmanov, A., Finn, D. A., & Crabbe, J. C. (2006). Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decades. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605342103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.