Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decades

Open access
Wahlsten, Douglas, Bachmanov, Alexander, Finn, Deborah A., Crabbe, John C.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

If we conduct the same experiment in two laboratories or repeat a classical study many years later, will we obtain the same results? Recent research with mice in neural and behavioral genetics yielded different results in different laboratories for certain phenotypes, and these findings suggested to some researchers that behavior may be too unstable for fine-scale genetic analysis. Here we expand the range of data on this question to additional laboratories and phenotypes, and, for the first time in this field, we formally compare recent data with experiments conducted 30–50 years ago. For ethanol preference and locomotor activity, strain differences have been highly stable over a period of 40–50 years, and most strain correlations are in the range of r = 0.85–0.98, as high as or higher than for brain weight. For anxiety-related behavior on the elevated plus maze, on the other hand, strain means often differ dramatically across laboratories or even when the same laboratory is moved to another site within a university. When a wide range of phenotypes is considered, no inbred strain appears to be exceptionally stable or labile across laboratories in any general sense, and there is no tendency to observe higher correlations among studies done more recently. Phenotypic drift over decades for most of the behaviors examined appears to be minimal.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0605342103

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1126/science.284.5420.1670 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/80553 · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.0409554102 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00140.x · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.101128598 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth299 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/ng1518 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1007/978-1-349-04904-2 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/71641 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1126/science.6953593 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/ng0597-19 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1007/s003359900464 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/neu.10173 · DOI · Paper page
  14. BJ Winer, DR Brown, KM Michels Statistical Principles in Experimental Design (McGraw-Hill, 3rd Ed, New York, 1991).
  15. 10.1007/978-3-540-48002-0_2 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90188-1 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0531-5565(67)90033-2 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/cne.901620408 · DOI
  19. 10.15288/qjsa.1959.20.691 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1037/h0043100 · DOI
  21. 10.1097/00006842-196607000-00028 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/BF02244901 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1037/h0083586 · DOI
  24. CH Southwick, LH Clark Commun Behav Biol 1, 49–59 (1968).
  25. 10.1016/S0361-9230(03)00033-9 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/BF00177912 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1007/BF02244948 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2004.00109.x · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.05.018 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/s002130050038 · DOI · Paper page
  31. MV Khrapova, NK Popova, DF Avgustinovich Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova 51, 324–328 (2001).
  32. 10.1016/S0166-4328(03)00107-4 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0091-3057(95)02126-4 · DOI · Paper page
  34. SC Maxson Techniques for the Genetic Analysis of Brain and Behavior: Focus on the Mouse, eds D Goldowitz, D Wahlsten, RE Wimer (Elsevier, Amsterdam), pp. 349–373 (1992).
  35. 10.1086/physzool.15.4.30151662 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a105080 · DOI
  37. BE Ginsburg Stimulation in Early Infancy, ed JA Ambrose (Academic, New York), pp. 73–96 (1969).
  38. 10.1007/BF01071302 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1971.tb00627.x · DOI
  40. 10.1002/1098-2337(1989)15:5<361::AID-AB2480150505>3.0.CO;2-6 · doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1989)15:5<361::aid-ab2480150505>3.0.co;2-6
  41. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2003.0056.x · DOI
  42. PL Roubertoux, I Le Roy, S Mortaud, F Perez-Diaz, S Tordjman Handbook of Molecular-Genetic Techniques for Brain and Behavior Research, eds WE Crusio, RT Gerlai (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam), pp. 696–709 (1999). · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00145.x · DOI
  44. 10.1023/A:1025774716976 · DOI
  45. 10.2337/diab.37.9.1163 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1037/h0028715 · doi:10.1037/h0028715
  47. 10.1101/gr.2825804 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1111/j.1601-183x.2004.00064.x · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1002/neu.10161 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1073/pnas.0501632102 · DOI
  51. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00121.x · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.06.010 · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.06.010
  53. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.031 · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.031
  54. 10.1038/nn1102-1101 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00037-2 · DOI

Cited by

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
Wahlsten, D., Bachmanov, A., Finn, D. A., & Crabbe, J. C.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-10-31
Volume
103
Issue
44
Pages
16364-16369
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2042631675
Cited by
281
References
4
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decades. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0605342103
The paper
Wahlsten, D., Bachmanov, A., Finn, D. A., & Crabbe, J. C. (2006). Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decades. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605342103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.