Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 643

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) polymer is a death signal

Open access
Andrabi, Shaida A., Kim, No Soo, Yu, Seong-Woon, Wang, Hongmin, Koh, David W., Sasaki, Masayuki, Klaus, Judith A., Otsuka, Takashi, Zhang, Zhizheng, Koehler, Raymond C., Hurn, Patricia D., Poirier, Guy G., Dawson, Valina L., Dawson, Ted M.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Excessive activation of the nuclear enzyme, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) plays a prominent role in various of models of cellular injury. Here, we identify poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) polymer, a product of PARP-1 activity, as a previously uncharacterized cell death signal. PAR polymer is directly toxic to neurons, and degradation of PAR polymer by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) or phosphodiesterase 1 prevents PAR polymer-induced cell death. PARP-1-dependent, NMDA excitotoxicity of cortical neurons is reduced by neutralizing antibodies to PAR and by overexpression of PARG. Neuronal cultures with reduced levels of PARG are more sensitive to NMDA excitotoxicity than WT cultures. Transgenic mice overexpressing PARG have significantly reduced infarct volumes after focal ischemia. Conversely, mice with reduced levels of PARG have significantly increased infarct volumes after focal ischemia compared with WT littermate controls. These results reveal PAR polymer as a signaling molecule that induces cell death and suggests that interference with PAR polymer signaling may offer innovative therapeutic approaches for the treatment of cellular injury.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0606526103

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 643

Metadata

Authors
Andrabi, S. A., Kim, N. S., Yu, S.-W., Wang, H., Koh, D. W., Sasaki, M., Klaus, J. A., Otsuka, T., Zhang, Z., Koehler, R. C., Hurn, P. D., Poirier, G. G., Dawson, V. L., & Dawson, T. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-11-28
Volume
103
Issue
48
Pages
18308-18313
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2059397580
Cited by
643
References
2
FWCI
17.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) polymer is a death signal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0606526103
The paper
Andrabi, S. A., Kim, N. S., Yu, S.-W., Wang, H., Koh, D. W., Sasaki, M., Klaus, J. A., Otsuka, T., Zhang, Z., Koehler, R. C., Hurn, P. D., Poirier, G. G., Dawson, V. L., & Dawson, T. M. (2006). Poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) polymer is a death signal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606526103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.