Cited by 153Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structure

Evidence that the adaptive allele of the brain size gene microcephalin introgressed into Homo sapiens from an archaic Homo lineage

Open access
Evans, Patrick D., Mekel-Bobrov, Nitzan, Vallender, Eric J., Hudson, Richard R., Lahn, Bruce T.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

At the center of the debate on the emergence of modern humans and their spread throughout the globe is the question of whether archaic Homo lineages contributed to the modern human gene pool, and more importantly, whether such contributions impacted the evolutionary adaptation of our species. A major obstacle to answering this question is that low levels of admixture with archaic lineages are not expected to leave extensive traces in the modern human gene pool because of genetic drift. Loci that have undergone strong positive selection, however, offer a unique opportunity to identify low-level admixture with archaic lineages, provided that the introgressed archaic allele has risen to high frequency under positive selection. The gene microcephalin ( MCPH1 ) regulates brain size during development and has experienced positive selection in the lineage leading to Homo sapiens . Within modern humans, a group of closely related haplotypes at this locus, known as haplogroup D, rose from a single copy ≈37,000 years ago and swept to exceptionally high frequency (≈70% worldwide today) because of positive selection. Here, we examine the origin of haplogroup D. By using the interhaplogroup divergence test, we show that haplogroup D likely originated from a lineage separated from modern humans ≈1.1 million years ago and introgressed into humans by ≈37,000 years ago. This finding supports the possibility of admixture between modern humans and archaic Homo populations (Neanderthals being one possibility). Furthermore, it buttresses the important notion that, through such adminture, our species has benefited evolutionarily by gaining new advantageous alleles. The interhaplogroup divergence test developed here may be broadly applicable to the detection of introgression at other loci in the human genome or in genomes of other species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0606966103

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, P. D., Mekel-Bobrov, N., Vallender, E. J., Hudson, R. R., & Lahn, B. T.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Ecologie & Evolution (FR)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-11-28
Volume
103
Issue
48
Pages
18178-18183
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2165571729
Cited by
153
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
83.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
microcephalin, MCPH1, brain size, introgression, Neanderthals, modern human origins, positive selection, haplogroup D, human admixture, genetic drift, human evolution
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Alleles, Animals, Brain, Biological Evolution, Humans, Models, Genetic, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Reproduction, Hominidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review