Evidence that the adaptive allele of the brain size gene microcephalin introgressed into Homo sapiens from an archaic Homo lineage
Open accessAbstract
At the center of the debate on the emergence of modern humans and their spread throughout the globe is the question of whether archaic Homo lineages contributed to the modern human gene pool, and more importantly, whether such contributions impacted the evolutionary adaptation of our species. A major obstacle to answering this question is that low levels of admixture with archaic lineages are not expected to leave extensive traces in the modern human gene pool because of genetic drift. Loci that have undergone strong positive selection, however, offer a unique opportunity to identify low-level admixture with archaic lineages, provided that the introgressed archaic allele has risen to high frequency under positive selection. The gene microcephalin ( MCPH1 ) regulates brain size during development and has experienced positive selection in the lineage leading to Homo sapiens . Within modern humans, a group of closely related haplotypes at this locus, known as haplogroup D, rose from a single copy ≈37,000 years ago and swept to exceptionally high frequency (≈70% worldwide today) because of positive selection. Here, we examine the origin of haplogroup D. By using the interhaplogroup divergence test, we show that haplogroup D likely originated from a lineage separated from modern humans ≈1.1 million years ago and introgressed into humans by ≈37,000 years ago. This finding supports the possibility of admixture between modern humans and archaic Homo populations (Neanderthals being one possibility). Furthermore, it buttresses the important notion that, through such adminture, our species has benefited evolutionarily by gaining new advantageous alleles. The interhaplogroup divergence test developed here may be broadly applicable to the detection of introgression at other loci in the human genome or in genomes of other species.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some genomic regions of modern humans were brought by introgression from an extinct ancestor, possibly Neanderthals.
“and that some genomic regions of modern humans were brought by introgression from an extinct ancestor, possibly Neanderthals113.”
From Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future. (2008) · cites this paper as [113]
Cites
Stratigraphic placement and age of modern humans from Kibish, Ethiopia
McDougall, I., Brown, F. H., & Fleagle, J. G. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03258 · Cited by 1,023 · see citing works
Global Patterns of Linkage Disequilibrium at the CD4 Locus and Modern Human Origins
Tishkoff, S. A., Dietzsch, E., Speed, W., Pakstis, A. J., Kidd, J. R., Cheung, K., Bonné-Tamir, B., Santachiara-Benerecetti, A. S., Moral, P., Krings, M., et al. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5254.1380 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Detecting Ancient Admixture in Humans Using Sequence Polymorphism Data
Wall, J. D. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/154.3.1271 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
The Atapuerca sites and their contribution to the knowledge of human evolution in Europe
Bermúdez de Castro, J. M., Martinón‐Torres, M., Carbonell, E., Sarmiento, S., Rosas, A., van der Made, J., & Lozano, M. (2004) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.10130 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome
Green, R. E., Krause, J., Briggs, A. W., Maricic, T., Stenzel, U., Kircher, M., Patterson, N., Li, H., Zhai, W., Fritz, M. H.-Y., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188021 · Cited by 4,318 · see citing works
Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future.
Slatkin, M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2361 · Cited by 1,614 · see citing works
THE HIDDEN SIDE OF INVASIONS: MASSIVE INTROGRESSION BY LOCAL GENES
Currat, M., Ruedi, M., Petit, R. J., & Excoffier, L. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00413.x · Cited by 816 · see citing works
The evolutionary genetics of personality
Penke, L., Denissen, J. J. A., & Miller, G. F. (2007) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.629 · Cited by 610 · see citing works
Evidence for archaic adaptive introgression in humans
Racimo, F., Sankararaman, S., Nielsen, R., & Huerta-Sánchez, E. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3936 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
The Date of Interbreeding between Neandertals and Modern Humans
Sankararaman, S., Patterson, N., Li, H., Pääbo, S., & Reich, D. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002947 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Genome-wide scans for footprints of natural selection
Oleksyk, T. K., Smith, M. W., & O'Brien, S. J. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0219 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Mendez, F. L., Watkins, J. C., & Hammer, M. F. (2012) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.06.015 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Hsieh, P., Woerner, A. E., Wall, J. D., Lachance, J., Tishkoff, S. A., Gutenkunst, R. N., & Hammer, M. F. (2016) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.196634.115 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Evolutionary and medical consequences of archaic introgression into modern human genomes
Dolgova, O., & Lao, O. (2018) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes9070358 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Crossroads of the Old World: Late Hominin Evolution in Western Asia
Franciscus, R. G., & Holliday, T. W. (2013) · The Origins of Modern Humans · doi:10.1002/9781118659991.ch2 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Evans, P. D., Mekel-Bobrov, N., Vallender, E. J., Hudson, R. R., & Lahn, B. T.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Ecologie & Evolution (FR)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2006-11-28
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 48
- Pages
- 18178-18183
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC1635020
- OpenAlex
- W2165571729
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 83.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- microcephalin, MCPH1, brain size, introgression, Neanderthals, modern human origins, positive selection, haplogroup D, human admixture, genetic drift, human evolution
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Biological, Alleles, Animals, Brain, Biological Evolution, Humans, Models, Genetic, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Reproduction, Hominidae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review