Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,926

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks

Open access
Onnela, J.-P., Saramäki, J., Hyvönen, J., Szabó, G., Lazer, D., Kaski, K., Kertész, J., Barabási, A.-L.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0610245104
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Electronic databases, from phone to e-mails logs, currently provide detailed records of human communication patterns, offering novel avenues to map and explore the structure of social and communication networks. Here we examine the communication patterns of millions of mobile phone users, allowing us to simultaneously study the local and the global structure of a society-wide communication network. We observe a coupling between interaction strengths and the network's local structure, with the counterintuitive consequence that social networks are robust to the removal of the strong ties but fall apart after a phase transition if the weak ties are removed. We show that this coupling significantly slows the diffusion process, resulting in dynamic trapping of information in communities and find that, when it comes to information diffusion, weak and strong ties are both simultaneously ineffective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0610245104

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.035103 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1073/pnas.0405728101 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.1081058 · DOI · Paper page
  4. W Aiello F Chung L Lu (Assoc Comput Machinery New York) pp. 171–180 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1080/13691180500146185 · DOI · Paper page
  6. MEJ Newman, DJ Watts, A-L Barabási The Structure and Dynamics of Networks (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, 2006).
  7. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198515906.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3200 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4626 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.0510525103 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/nature02289 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.278701 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1126/science.272.5264.984 · DOI
  14. 10.2307/3033543 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1073/pnas.122653799 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1086/225469 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.7208/chicago/9780226518404.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  18. P Csermely Weak Links: Stabilizers of Complex Systems from Proteins to Social Networks (Springer, 1st Ed, Berlin, 2006).
  19. P Jaccard Bull Soc Vaudoise Sci Nat 37, 547–579 (1901).
  20. D Stauffer, A Aharony Introduction to Percolation Theory (CRC, 2nd Ed, London, 1994).
  21. A Bunde, S Havlin Fractals and Disordered Systems (Springer, 2nd Ed, New York), pp. 51 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.178701 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/428716a · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.188701 · DOI · Paper page
  25. EM Rogers Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, 5th Ed, New York, 2003).
  26. 10.1137/S0036144500371907 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1140/epjb/e2004-00128-7 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5468 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199211517.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Onnela, J.-P., Saramäki, J., Hyvönen, J., Szabó, G., Lazer, D., Kaski, K., Kertész, J., & Barabási, A.-L.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-05
Volume
104
Issue
18
Pages
7332-7336
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.0610245104
OpenAlex
W2141113219
Cited by
1,926
References
5
FWCI
56.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.pnas.org/site/misc/userlicense.xhtml (vor, 176 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.