Cited by 88

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Trk-signaling endosomes are generated by Rac-dependent macroendocytosis

Valdez, Gregorio, Philippidou, Polyxeni, Rosenbaum, Julie, Akmentin, Wendy, Shao, Yufang, Halegoua, Simon·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Why neurotrophins and their Trk receptors promote neuronal differentiation and survival whereas receptor tyrosine kinases for other growth factors, such as EGF, do not, has been a long-standing question in neurobiology. We provide evidence that one difference lies in the selective ability of Trk to generate long-lived signaling endosomes. We show that Trk endocytosis is distinguished from the classical clathrin-based endocytosis of EGF receptor (EGFR). Although Trk and EGFR each stimulate membrane ruffling, only Trk undergoes both selective and specific macroendocytosis at ruffles, which uniquely requires the Rho-GTPase, Rac, and the trafficking protein, Pincher. This process leads to Trk-signaling endosomes, which are immature multivesicular bodies that retain Rab5. In contrast, EGFR endosomes rapidly exchange Rab5 for Rab7, thereby transiting into late-endosomes/lysosomes for degradation. Sustained endosomal signaling by Trk does not reflect intrinsic differences between Trk and EGFR, because each elicits long-term Erk-kinase activation from the cell surface. Thus, a population of stable Trk endosomes, formed by specialized macroendocytosis in neurons, provides a privileged endosome-based system for propagation of signals to the nucleus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0702819104

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. S Halegoua, RC Armstrong, NE Kremer Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 165, 119–170 (1991).
  2. 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90339-2 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90075-N · DOI
  4. 10.1038/33451 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90133-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1074/jbc.M504163200 · DOI
  7. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-15-05406.2001 · DOI
  8. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-15-05671.2000 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00266-6 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nn720 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00397-0 · DOI
  12. 10.1083/jcb.200201063 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5104-04.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.06.001 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0301-0082(96)00046-9 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nature02542 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90280-6 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00541-8 · DOI
  19. 10.1242/jcs.112.9.1303 · DOI
  20. 10.1126/science.274.5295.2086 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/S0959-4388(02)00326-4 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90164-8 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/emboj/17.3.754 · DOI
  24. 10.1091/mbc.e03-01-0019 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90306-W · DOI
  26. 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.004313 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00526-8 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.043 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90033-A · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00611-6 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1210/endo.139.7.6122 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Valdez, G., Philippidou, P., Rosenbaum, J., Akmentin, W., Shao, Y., & Halegoua, S.
Affiliations
*Department of Neurobiology and Behavior and the Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Research and
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-07-24
Volume
104
Issue
30
Pages
12270-12275
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
88
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review