Cited by 131

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pincher-Mediated Macroendocytosis Underlies Retrograde Signaling by Neurotrophin Receptors

Valdez, Gregorio, Akmentin, Wendy, Philippidou, Polyxeni, Kuruvilla, Rejji, Ginty, David D., Halegoua, Simon·2005·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Retrograde signaling by neurotrophins is crucial for regulating neuronal phenotype and survival. The mechanism responsible for retrograde signaling has been elusive, because the molecular entities that propagate Trk receptor tyrosine kinase signals from the nerve terminal to the soma have not been defined. Here, we show that the membrane trafficking protein Pincher defines the primary pathway responsible for neurotrophin retrograde signaling in neurons. By both immunofluorescence confocal and immunoelectron microscopy, we find that Pincher mediates the formation of newly identified clathrin-independent macroendosomes for Trk receptors in soma, axons, and dendrites. Trk macroendosomes are derived from plasma membrane ruffles and subsequently processed to multivesicular bodies. Pincher similarly mediates macroendocytosis for NGF (TrkA) and BDNF (TrkB) in both peripheral (sympathetic) and central (hippocampal) neurons. A unique feature of Pincher-Trk endosomes is refractoriness to lysosomal degradation, which ensures persistent signaling through a critical effector of retrograde survival signaling, Erk5 (extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5). Using sympathetic neurons grown in chamber cultures, we find that block of Pincher function, which prevents Trk macroendosome formation, eliminates retrogradely signaled neuronal survival. Pincher is the first distinguishing molecular component of a novel mechanistic pathway for endosomal signaling in neurons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5104-04.2005

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1101/SQB.1996.061.01.042 · DOI
  2. 10.1074/jbc.274.1.257 · DOI
  3. 2003, J Neurosci, 23, 3209, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-08-03209.2003 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90233-0 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/neu.10322 · DOI
  6. 10.1146/annurev.ne.17.030194.001411 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00397-0 · DOI
  8. 10.1083/jcb.130.1.149 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19961007)374:1<21::AID-CNE2>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
  10. 10.1074/jbc.M208468200 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0959-4388(02)00326-4 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.73.7.2424 · DOI
  13. 10.1074/jbc.M307702200 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 1991, Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 165, 119
  15. 10.1038/nn1242 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90241-5 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90536-8 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/neu.10323 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00526-8 · DOI
  20. 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36707 · DOI
  21. 10.1074/jbc.M202401200 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.021 · DOI
  23. 2002, J Neurosci, 22, 10377, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-23-10377.2002 · DOI
  24. 10.1126/science.3306916 · DOI
  25. 10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.001445 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.1064913 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0165-0270(98)00156-3 · DOI
  28. 10.1083/jcb.59.2.329 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03313.x · DOI
  30. 10.1083/jcb.142.2.485 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01538-8 · DOI
  32. 10.1006/geno.1999.5800 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00443-3 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1126/science.277.5329.1097 · DOI
  35. 10.1074/jbc.273.52.34933 · DOI
  36. 10.1074/jbc.M008551200 · DOI
  37. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131421 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1083/jcb.200201063 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 1999, J Neurosci, 19, 8207, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-19-08207.1999 · DOI
  40. 10.1083/jcb.146.5.955 · DOI
  41. 1996, Oncogene, 13, 721
  42. 1999, J Neurosci, 19, 7889, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-18-07889.1999 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1038/nn720 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/neu.10318 · DOI
  45. 2001, J Neurosci, 21, RC125, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-03-j0003.2001 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00266-6 · DOI
  47. 2000, J Neurosci, 20, 5671, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-15-05671.2000 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Valdez, G., Akmentin, W., Philippidou, P., Kuruvilla, R., Ginty, D. D., & Halegoua, S.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2005-05-25
Volume
25
Issue
21
Pages
5236-5247
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
131
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review