The DOI matches its Crossref record; 154 of the 154 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What a difference a decade makes: Insights into translesion DNA synthesis
Open accessAbstract
Living organisms are continually under attack from a vast array of DNA-damaging agents that imperils their genomic integrity. As a consequence, cells posses an army of enzymes to repair their damaged chromosomes. However, DNA lesions often persist and pose a considerable threat to survival, because they can block the cell's replicase and its ability to complete genome duplication. It has been clear for many years that cells must possess a mechanism whereby the DNA lesion could be tolerated and physically bypassed. Yet it was only within the past decade that specialized DNA polymerases for “translesion DNA synthesis” or “TLS” were identified and characterized. Many of the TLS enzymes belong to the recently described “Y-family” of DNA polymerases. By possessing a spacious preformed active site, these enzymes can physically accommodate a variety of DNA lesions and facilitate their bypass. Flexible DNA-binding domains and a variable binding pocket for the replicating base pair further allow these TLS polymerases to select specific lesions to bypass and favor distinct non-Watson–Crick base pairs. Consequently, TLS polymerases tend to exhibit much lower fidelity than the cell's replicase when copying normal DNA, which results in a dramatic increase in mutagenesis. Occasionally this can be beneficial, but it often speeds the onset of cancer in humans. Cells use both transcriptional and posttranslational regulation to keep these low-fidelity polymerases under strict control and limit their access to a replication fork. Our perspective focuses on the mechanistic insights into TLS by the Y-family polymerases, how they are regulated, and their effects on genomic (in)stability that have been described in the past decade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO
Hoege, C., Pfander, B., Moldovan, G.-L., Pyrowolakis, G., & Jentsch, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00991 · Cited by 2,198
PCNA, the Maestro of the Replication Fork
Moldovan, G.-L., Pfander, B., & Jentsch, S. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.003 · Cited by 1,796
The XPV (xeroderma pigmentosum variant) gene encodes human DNA polymerase η
Masutani, C., Kusumoto, R., Yamada, A., Dohmae, N., Yokoi, M., Yuasa, M., Araki, M., Iwai, S., Takio, K., & Hanaoka, F. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/21447 · Cited by 1,292
EUKARYOTIC TRANSLESION SYNTHESIS DNA POLYMERASES: Specificity of Structure and Function
Prakash, S., Johnson, R. E., & Prakash, L. (2005) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133250 · Cited by 1,000
The Y-Family of DNA Polymerases
Ohmori, H., Friedberg, E. C., Fuchs, R. P. P., Goodman, M. F., Hanaoka, F., Hinkle, D., Kunkel, T. A., Lawrence, C. W., Livneh, Z., Nohmi, T., et al. (2001) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00278-7 · Cited by 882
Self-citationControl of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation
Stelter, P., & Ulrich, H. D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01965 · Cited by 847
Interaction of Human DNA Polymerase η with Monoubiquitinated PCNA
Kannouche, P. L., Wing, J., & Lehmann, A. R. (2004) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(04)00259-x · Cited by 845
Efficient Bypass of a Thymine-Thymine Dimer by Yeast DNA Polymerase, Polη
Johnson, R. E., Prakash, S., & Prakash, L. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5404.1001 · Cited by 736
hRAD30 Mutations in the Variant Form of Xeroderma Pigmentosum
Johnson, R. E., Kondratick, C. M., Prakash, S., & Prakash, L. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5425.263 · Cited by 732
Error-Prone Repair DNA Polymerases in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Goodman, M. F. (2002) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.083101.124707 · Cited by 727
Cited by
Transcription-coupled DNA repair: two decades of progress and surprises
Hanawalt, P. C., & Spivak, G. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2549 · Cited by 1,044
Y-family DNA polymerases and their role in tolerance of cellular DNA damage
Sale, J. E., Lehmann, A. R., & Woodgate, R. (2012) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3289 · Cited by 665
Self-citationHuang, W., Massouras, A., Inoue, Y., Peiffer, J., Ràmia, M., Tarone, A. M., Turlapati, L., Zichner, T., Zhu, D., Lyman, R. F., et al. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.171546.113 · Cited by 661
Eukaryotic Translesion Polymerases and Their Roles and Regulation in DNA Damage Tolerance
Waters, L. S., Minesinger, B. K., Wiltrout, M. E., D'Souza, S., Woodruff, R. V., & Walker, G. C. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00034-08 · Cited by 591
Role of reactive oxygen species in antibiotic action and resistance
Dwyer, D. J., Kohanski, M. A., & Collins, J. J. (2009) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2009.06.018 · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, W., & Woodgate, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-10-02
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 15591-15598
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2065626377
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 154
- FWCI
- 13.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What a difference a decade makes: Insights into translesion DNA synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0704219104
- The paper
- Yang, W., & Woodgate, R. (2007). What a difference a decade makes: Insights into translesion DNA synthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704219104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.