Cited by 307Prostate Cancer Treatment and ResearchEstrogen and related hormone effectsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

A surface on the androgen receptor that allosterically regulates coactivator binding

Open access
Estébanez-Perpiñá, Eva, Arnold, Leggy A., Nguyen, Phuong, Rodrigues, Edson Delgado, Mar, Ellena, Bateman, Raynard, Pallai, Peter, Shokat, Kevan M. +4 more·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Current approaches to inhibit nuclear receptor (NR) activity target the hormone binding pocket but face limitations. We have proposed that inhibitors, which bind to nuclear receptor surfaces that mediate assembly of the receptor's binding partners, might overcome some of these limitations. The androgen receptor (AR) plays a central role in prostate cancer, but conventional inhibitors lose effectiveness as cancer treatments because anti-androgen resistance usually develops. We conducted functional and x-ray screens to identify compounds that bind the AR surface and block binding of coactivators for AR activation function 2 (AF-2). Four compounds that block coactivator binding in solution with IC(50) approximately 50 microM and inhibit AF-2 activity in cells were detected: three nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the thyroid hormone 3,3',5-triiodothyroacetic acid. Although visualization of compounds at the AR surface reveals weak binding at AF-2, the most potent inhibitors bind preferentially to a previously unknown regulatory surface cleft termed binding function (BF)-3, which is a known target for mutations in prostate cancer and androgen insensitivity syndrome. X-ray structural analysis reveals that 3,3',5-triiodothyroacetic acid binding to BF-3 remodels the adjacent interaction site AF-2 to weaken coactivator binding. Mutation of residues that form BF-3 inhibits AR function and AR AF-2 activity. We propose that BF-3 is a previously unrecognized allosteric regulatory site needed for AR activity in vivo and a possible pharmaceutical target.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0708036104

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [25]Wells J, Arkin M, Braisted A, DeLano W, McDowell B, Oslob J, Raimundo B, Randal M (2003) Ernst Schering Res Found Workshop 19-27.
  2. [31]Braverman LE, Utiger RD (2000) (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Estébanez-Perpiñá, E., Arnold, L. A., Nguyen, P., Rodrigues, E. D., Mar, E., Bateman, R., Pallai, P., Shokat, K. M., Baxter, J. D., Guy, R. K., Webb, P., & Fletterick, R. J.
Affiliations
  • *Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics,
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Department of Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, and
  • Bioblocks, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-10-09
Volume
104
Issue
41
Pages
16074-16079
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2127226545
Cited by
307
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH)
  • Prostate Cancer Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (W81XWH, DK41482, DK51281)
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Cancer Institute (CA 89520, P50CA089520)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 41482, DK51281, R55DK058080, R01DK058080, R01DK051281, DK58080)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
androgen receptor, allosteric regulation, coactivator binding, AF-2, antiandrogen resistance, prostate cancer, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, triiodothyroacetic acid, X-ray crystal structure, androgen insensitivity syndrome, drug target identification
MeSH terms
Allosteric Site, Animals, Models, Molecular, Receptors, Androgen, Recombinant Proteins, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Crystallography, X-Ray, Mice, Nuclear Receptor Coactivator 2, Androgen Receptor Antagonists, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review