Cited by 347Epilepsy research and treatmentNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Nonrandom connectivity of the epileptic dentate gyrus predicts a major role for neuronal hubs in seizures

Open access
Morgan, Robert J., Soltesz, Ivan·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Many complex neuronal circuits have been shown to display nonrandom features in their connectivity. However, the functional impact of nonrandom network topologies in neurological diseases is not well understood. The dentate gyrus is an excellent circuit in which to study such functional implications because proepileptic insults cause its structure to undergo a number of specific changes in both humans and animals, including the formation of previously nonexistent granule cell-to-granule cell recurrent excitatory connections. Here, we use a large-scale, biophysically realistic model of the epileptic rat dentate gyrus to reconnect the aberrant recurrent granule cell network in four biologically plausible ways to determine how nonrandom connectivity promotes hyperexcitability after injury. We find that network activity of the dentate gyrus is quite robust in the face of many major alterations in granule cell-to-granule cell connectivity. However, the incorporation of a small number of highly interconnected granule cell hubs greatly increases network activity, resulting in a hyperexcitable, potentially seizure-prone circuit. Our findings demonstrate the functional relevance of nonrandom microcircuits in epileptic brain networks, and they provide a mechanism that could explain the role of granule cells with hilar basal dendrites in contributing to hyperexcitability in the pathological dentate gyrus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0801372105

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The previously built dentate gyrus model was used by several groups to study disparate topics including epilepsy, network mechanisms of inhibition and excitability, simulation optimization, and modeling software.

    “Previously, we built a dentate gyrus model to study epileptic network dynamics (Santhakumar et al., 2005; Morgan and Soltesz, 2008) that was then used by several groups to study disparate topics including epilepsy, network mechanisms of inhibition and excitability, simulation optimization, and modeling software”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [38]Buckmaster PS, Thind K. Quantifying routes of positive-feedback among granule cells in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2005;46:91–131. [[Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=Epilepsia&title=Quantifying%20routes%20of%20positive-feedback%20among%20granule%20cells%20in%20a%20model%20of%20temporal%20lobe%20epilepsy&author=PS%20Buckmaster&author=K%20Thind&volume=46&publication_year=2005&pages=91-131&)]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, R. J., & Soltesz, I.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, 193 Irvine Hall, Irvine, CA 92697
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-04-22
Volume
105
Issue
16
Pages
6179-6184
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2131705496
Cited by
347
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 49
FWCI
20.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NS35915)
  • University of California, Irvine
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R29NS035915, R01NS035915, NS-35915, R37NS035915)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
granule cells, network hyperexcitability, seizure generation
MeSH terms
Animals, Models, Biological, Nerve Net, Neurons, Seizures, Dentate Gyrus, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review