Interneuronal mechanisms of hippocampal theta oscillations in a full-scale model of the rodent CA1 circuit
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The hippocampal theta rhythm plays important roles in information processing; however, the mechanisms of its generation are not well understood. We developed a data-driven, supercomputer-based, full-scale (1:1) model of the rodent CA1 area and studied its interneurons during theta oscillations. Theta rhythm with phase-locked gamma oscillations and phase-preferential discharges of distinct interneuronal types spontaneously emerged from the isolated CA1 circuit without rhythmic inputs. Perturbation experiments identified parvalbumin-expressing interneurons and neurogliaform cells, as well as interneuronal diversity itself, as important factors in theta generation. These simulations reveal new insights into the spatiotemporal organization of the CA1 circuit during theta oscillations.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
A data-driven, full-scale model of the isolated rodent CA1 spontaneously generated theta (~7.8 Hz) and phase-locked gamma oscillations without rhythmic external inputs. Perturbation experiments implicated PV+ interneurons, neurogliaform cells, pyramidal recurrent connections, and interneuronal diversity itself in theta generation.
Key findings
- The model contained 338,740 cells (311,500 pyramidal cells and 27,240 interneurons), 454,700 artificial stimulating afferents, and 5.19 billion synapses; it spontaneously produced stable theta at 7.8 Hz and gamma oscillations (25–80 Hz), with gamma amplitude phase-locked to the theta trough.
- Distinct interneuron types showed phase-preferential firing: PV+ basket, bistratified, and O-LM cells fired near the theta trough, whereas ivy, neurogliaform, CCK+ basket, and axo-axonic cells fired least around the trough; 71% (5/7) of interneuron types with experimental data matched anesthetized in vivo phase maxima.
- Muting pyramidal cell output or CA1 pyramidal-to-pyramidal connections collapsed theta; muting PV-family, CCK+ basket, or neurogliaform cell output strongly reduced theta, while muting O-LM, ivy, or SC-A cells had no effect. Partial PV+ muting disrupted theta more than partial SOM+ muting.
- Reducing interneuron diversity abolished theta: giving all interneurons one electrophysiological profile, or morphing them toward PV+ basket cells, did not restore theta. Removing the GABAB component of neurogliaform synapses reduced theta power, but replacing it with a scaled-up fast GABAA conductance with equivalent charge transfer restored theta.
Methods
- The CA1 network was implemented in parallel NEURON 7.4 with one multicompartmental pyramidal cell type and eight interneuron types; connectivity and cell numbers were taken from Bezaire and Soltesz (2013), and simulations used fixed time steps of 0.01–0.025 ms for 2000 or 4000 ms on supercomputers.
- CA3 and entorhinal afferents were modeled as independent Poisson spike trains; control theta emerged at a mean afferent firing rate of 0.65 Hz, and analyses included spike density functions, Welch periodograms, spectrograms, an LFP analog, Rayleigh tests for phase modulation, and ANOVA for GABAB-related simulations.
- Perturbation experiments muted each cell type’s output, altered pyramidal-to-pyramidal connection numbers, reduced interneuron diversity, and manipulated neurogliaform GABAB/GABAA signaling.
Limitations
- Stated: about 30% of known CA1 interneurons were omitted due to paucity of quantitative data, likely making inhibition weaker than biological; pyramidal cells fired more than in vivo, and although scaled-up inhibition produced only 1% active pyramidal cells firing at 1.8 Hz, it was not used because the source of the additional inhibition was unidentified.
- Stated: the model did not include neuromodulators, gap junctions, short-term plasticity, glial dynamics, pyramidal cell diversity, or cell-to-cell variability; the emergent theta likely resembled the atropine-resistant form, some single-cell electrophysiology came from mouse while the network was rat, and no isolated-CA1 data were available for interneuron phase preferences, so comparisons used anesthetized in vivo data.
- Evident: theta appeared only within particular afferent excitation levels (around 0.65 Hz; lower or higher levels disrupted it), gamma was not examined further, and the authors note they could not rule out a hypothetical theta regime somewhere in the low-diversity parameter space.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 87 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation
The model network contained 338,740 cells, including 311,500 pyramidal cells and 27,240 interneurons.
“The model network contained 338,740 cells (similar to the biological CA1 in rats, including 311,500 pyramidal cells and 27,240 interneurons) (Figure 1D–E and Figure 1—figure supplement 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The network developed a stable, spontaneous theta rhythm (5-10 Hz) at certain tonic excitation levels.
“We varied the magnitude of arrhythmic, tonic excitation to the network (by systematically changing the mean spiking frequency of the artificial stimulating cells, see above) and identified excitation levels where the network developed a stable, spontaneous theta rhythm (5–10 Hz; Figure 3 and 4; Figure 3—source data 1–3 and Figure 4—source data 1–2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The model network contained a total of 5.19 billion synaptic connections.
“The afferent divergence and convergence onto the cells were also anatomically patterned, maintaining the topographical arrangement seen experimentally (Hongo et al., 2015), for a total of 5.19 billion synaptic connections in the model network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The theta oscillation was stable, maintaining a steady power level throughout the duration of the oscillation.
“The theta oscillation was stable, maintaining a steady power level throughout the duration of the oscillation (Figure 4A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The model network displayed gamma oscillations (25-80 Hz).
“In addition to theta rhythm, the model network displayed gamma oscillations (25–80 Hz; Figures 3B and 4D), as expected based on in vivo data (Soltesz and Deschênes, 1993; Tort et al., 2009; Colgin and Moser, 2010) and in vitro slice data showing 65–75 Hz gamma oscillations arising in response to theta rhythmic network stimulation (Butler et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Soltesz and Deschênes, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tort et al., 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Colgin and Moser, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Theta was apparent within one theta period of the simulation start in all measures of network activity.
“In all of these measures of network activity, theta was apparent within one theta period of the simulation start.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The highest amplitude of the gamma oscillations in the model was observed at the theta trough (0°/360°) in the pyramidal layer LFP analog.
“The highest amplitude of the gamma oscillations in the model was observed at the theta trough (0°/360°) in the pyramidal layer LFP analog (Figure 4C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The amplitude envelope of the gamma oscillation was phase-locked to the theta rhythm.
“The amplitude envelope of the gamma oscillation was phase-locked to the theta rhythm (Figures 3A,B and 4C), as it is in the biological CA1, representing cross-frequency coupling (Soltesz and Deschênes, 1993; Bragin et al., 1995; Buzsáki et al., 2003; Jensen and Colgin, 2007; Belluscio et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
Pyramidal cell spikes exhibited peak power around the theta frequency of 7.8 Hz.
“The pyramidal cell spikes (Figures 3C and D) exhibited peak power around the theta frequency of 7.8 Hz (Figure 4 and Table 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Pyramidal cells in the model tended to fire more than they typically do during theta oscillations in vivo.
“Indeed, the pyramidal cells in our model described above (Figures 3 and 4) tended to fire more than they typically do during theta oscillations in vivo (e.g., [Soltesz and Deschênes, 1993; Robbe et al., 2006]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Soltesz and Deschênes, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Robbe et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Every measure of network activity showed theta oscillations.
“Importantly, every measure of network activity showed theta oscillations, including the somatic intracellular membrane potential from individual cells (Figure 3D), the spike times of individual cells and all cells collectively (Figure 3C), and aggregate measures such as the spike density function (Szucs, 1998) per cell type and the LFP analog (Figure 3A and 4; see also Figure 4—figure supplement 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Interneuronal diversity itself is an important factor in theta generation.
“Perturbation experiments identified parvalbumin-expressing interneurons and neurogliaform cells, as well as interneuronal diversity itself, as important factors in theta generation.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Perturbation experiments revealed that parvalbumin-expressing (PV+) interneurons, neurogliaform cells, connections between CA1 pyramidal cells, and interneuronal diversity were important for theta generation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Findingown data
Pyramidal cells preferentially discharged around the trough 0°/360° of the LFP analog theta rhythm.
“As expected, the numerically dominant pyramidal cells, whose intracellular membrane potential oscillations to a large extent generate and underlie the extracellular LFP signal during theta oscillations (Buzsáki et al., 2012), preferentially discharged around the trough 0o/360o of the LFP analog theta rhythm (Figure 5A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The phase preferences of model interneurons fell into two broad categories.
“Their phase preferences fell into two broad categories (Figure 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Parvalbumin-expressing interneurons are important factors in theta generation.
“Perturbation experiments identified parvalbumin-expressing interneurons and neurogliaform cells, as well as interneuronal diversity itself, as important factors in theta generation.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Perturbation experiments revealed that parvalbumin-expressing (PV+) interneurons, neurogliaform cells, connections between CA1 pyramidal cells, and interneuronal diversity were important for theta generation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Findingown data
The ability to generate theta oscillations, phase-locked gamma oscillations, and theta-related phase-preferential firing of distinct interneuronal subtypes was not a universal property of the model.
“Importantly, the ability to generate theta oscillations, phase-locked gamma oscillations, and theta-related phase-preferential firing of distinct interneuronal subtypes was not a universal property of the model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The strongly constrained model only exhibited spontaneous theta oscillations at certain levels of afferent excitation.
“As shown in Figure 6A, our strongly constrained model only exhibited spontaneous theta oscillations at certain levels of afferent excitation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The largest differences between the model and the in vivo phase-preferential firing occurred for the PV+ basket cells and the ivy cells.
“The largest differences between the model and the in vivo phase-preferential firing occurred for the PV+ basket cells and the ivy cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The model's interneuronal phase preferences were in line with recent data from the isolated CA1 preparation in vitro, which showed that cells belonging to the broadly defined SOM+ and PV+ classes displayed phase preferences similar to the O-LM, PV+ basket and bistratified cells in the model.
“These results were in line with recent data from the isolated CA1 preparation in vitro (Ferguson et al., 2015) which showed that cells belonging to the broadly defined SOM+ and PV+ classes (identified using genetic drivers) displayed phase preferences similar to the O-LM, PV+ basket and bistratified cells in our model”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferguson et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The phase of LFP theta recorded in the stratum radiatum is approximately 180 degrees out of phase with the pyramidal cell layer theta used in this paper.
- Findingown data
Neurogliaform cells are important factors in theta generation.
“Perturbation experiments identified parvalbumin-expressing interneurons and neurogliaform cells, as well as interneuronal diversity itself, as important factors in theta generation.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Perturbation experiments revealed that parvalbumin-expressing (PV+) interneurons, neurogliaform cells, connections between CA1 pyramidal cells, and interneuronal diversity were important for theta generation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Findingown data
The second group of model interneurons, including ivy and neurogliaform cells, CCK+ basket cells and axo-axonic cells, fired least around the theta trough, leading to an inverted firing probability distribution relative to the first group.
“In contrast, the second group of cells, including the ivy and neurogliaform cells, the CCK+ basket cells and the axo-axonic cells, fired least around the theta trough, leading to an inverted firing probability distribution relative to the first group of interneurons (Figure 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Connections between CA1 pyramidal cells are important for theta generation.
“Perturbation experiments revealed that parvalbumin-expressing (PV+) interneurons, neurogliaform cells, connections between CA1 pyramidal cells, and interneuronal diversity were important for theta generation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The first group of model interneurons, including PV+ basket cells, bistratified cells and O-LM cells, were most likely to fire at the theta trough compared to other theta phases.
“The cells belonging to the first group, including the PV+ basket cells, bistratified cells and O-LM cells, were most likely to fire at the theta trough compared to other theta phases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The cell-type-specific preferred phases of firing emerged spontaneously from the full-scale model, without purposeful tuning of parameters except the mean spiking frequency and synaptic strength of the artificial stimulating cells.
“Importantly, this fundamental property emerged spontaneously from the full-scale model, without purposeful tuning of parameters except the mean spiking frequency and synaptic strength of the artificial stimulating cells to set the incoming excitation levels from afferents (see Materials and methods for details).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Interneurons in the model preferentially fired at specific phases of theta oscillations, depending on the cell type.
“Interneurons in the model preferentially fired at specific phases of theta oscillations, depending on the cell type.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The majority (71%; 5/7) of the interneuron types for which there were experimental data, including the CCK+ basket, axo-axonic, bistratified, O-LM and neurogliaform cells, showed similar preferential maxima in their firing probabilities in the model and in vivo.
“Specifically, the majority (71%; 5/7) of the interneuron types for which there were experimental data, including the CCK+ basket, axo-axonic, bistratified, O-LM and neurogliaform cells, showed similar preferential maxima in their firing probabilities in the model (Figure 5A) and in vivo (Figure 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The phase preferences of interneurons in anesthetized animals are comparable to those in the model's conditions for the purpose of validating the model.
- Findingown data
The oscillation featured strong harmonics at multiples of the theta frequency of 7.8 Hz.
“The oscillation also featured strong harmonics at multiples of the theta frequency of 7.8 Hz.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The differential effects of silencing PV+ versus SOM+ cells could also be obtained in a rationally simplified model called the Network Clamp.
“The differential effects of silencing PV+ versus SOM+ cells could also be obtained in a rationally simplified model called the Network Clamp, where a single pyramidal cell was virtually extracted from the full-scale CA1 network with all of its afferent synapses intact (for further details, see Bezaire et al., 2016a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bezaire et al., 2016a
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Silencing the output from any of the fast-spiking, PV family interneurons (PV+ basket, axo-axonic, or bistratified cells), CCK+ basket cells, or neurogliaform cells strongly reduced theta power in the network.
“Silencing the output from any of the fast-spiking, PV family interneurons (PV+ basket, axo-axonic, or bistratified cells), CCK+ basket cells, or neurogliaform cells also strongly reduced theta power in the network (Figure 6B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Muting other interneuronal types (S.C.-A cells, O-LM cells, or ivy cells) had no effect on this form of theta oscillations generated by the intra-CA1 network.
“In contrast, muting other interneuronal types (S.C.-A cells, O-LM cells, or ivy cells) had no effect on this form of theta oscillations generated by the intra-CA1 network (Figure 6B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
These results were in overall agreement with experimental data from the isolated CA1 preparation indicating that optogenetic silencing of PV+ cells, but not SOM+ cells such as the O-LM cells, caused a marked reduction in theta oscillations.
“Reassuringly, these results were in overall agreement with experimental data from the isolated CA1 preparation indicating that optogenetic silencing of PV+ cells, but not SOM+ cells such as the O-LM cells, caused a marked reduction in theta oscillations (Amilhon et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Amilhon et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Removing the GABAB component from the neurogliaform synapses onto other neurogliaform cells and pyramidal cells showed a significant drop in theta power.
“Removing the GABAB component from the neurogliaform synapses onto other neurogliaform cells and pyramidal cells showed a significant drop in theta power.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Massively increasing the weight of the GABAA component to produce a similar amount of charge transfer restored theta power.
“Massively increasing the weight of the GABAA component to produce a similar amount of charge transfer restored theta power”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Muting all the outputs from pyramidal cells caused the theta rhythm to disappear.
“When we muted all the outputs from pyramidal cells, theta rhythm disappeared (bar labeled ‘Pyr’ in Figure 6B)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When the excitation level decreased below 0.65 Hz, the theta rhythm fell apart.
“When the excitation level decreased below 0.65 Hz, the theta rhythm fell apart”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Muting the relatively rare CA1 pyramidal cell to pyramidal cell excitatory connections alone was sufficient to collapse the theta rhythm.
“Interestingly, muting the relatively rare CA1 pyramidal cell to pyramidal cell excitatory connections alone (each pyramidal cell contacts 197 other pyramidal cells in the CA1; Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013) was sufficient to collapse the theta rhythm (bar labeled ‘None’ in Figure 6C)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
A wide range in excitation was unable to produce theta in the PV+ B. network.
“A wide range in excitation was unable to produce theta in the PV+ B. network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Theta power dramatically decreased when pyramidal cell to pyramidal cell connections were either increased (doubled) or decreased (halved) from the biologically observed 197.
“theta power dramatically decreased when these connections were either increased (doubled) or decreased (halved) from the biologically observed 197 (Figure 6C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Theta activity was restored when the neurogliaform cell output synapses had no slow GABAB component, only a scaled up fast GABAA IPSP with a charge transfer equivalent to the mixed GABAA,B synapses.
“As shown in Figure 6H (green bar), theta activity was restored when the neurogliaform cell output synapses had no slow GABAB component, only a scaled up fast GABAA IPSP with a charge transfer equivalent to the mixed GABAA,B synapses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When excited with arrhythmic inputs at physiologically relevant levels, the model displayed spontaneous theta (and gamma) oscillations with phase preferential firing across the nine model cell types (pyramidal cells and eight interneuron classes).
“When excited with arrhythmic inputs at physiologically relevant levels (see below), the model displayed spontaneous theta (and gamma) oscillations with phase preferential firing across the nine model cell types (pyramidal cells and eight interneuron classes).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These oscillations emerged from the network model without explicit encoding, rhythmic inputs or purposeful tuning of intra-CA1 parameters.
“Consistent with experimental results (Goutagny et al., 2009; Amilhon et al., 2015), these oscillations emerged from the network model without explicit encoding, rhythmic inputs or purposeful tuning of intra-CA1 parameters (all anatomical connectivity parameters were exactly as previously published in Bezaire and Soltesz (2013)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
Theta was not apparent in any intermediate steps nor in the final network where all interneurons had become PV+ basket cells.
“Theta was not apparent in any intermediate steps nor in the final network where all interneurons had become PV+ basket cells (‘All PV+B’ in Figure 6F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Giving all interneurons a single electrophysiological profile appeared to create conditions that were not conducive for the appearance of spontaneous theta oscillations regardless of which interneuronal profile was used.
“Surprisingly, giving all interneurons a single electrophysiological profile appeared to create conditions that were not conducive for the appearance of spontaneous theta oscillations regardless of which interneuronal profile was used (Figure 6E; note that the cells still differed in the strengths, distribution, and identities of their incoming and outgoing connections after this manipulation).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When the GABAB component of all neurogliaform cell outgoing synaptic connections was selectively removed, theta power was strongly reduced.
“Indeed, when we selectively removed the GABAB component of all neurogliaform cell outgoing synaptic connections, theta power was strongly reduced (Figure 6H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PV+ basket cells exhibited strong theta power in their spiking in the control network model.
“and exhibited strong theta power in their spiking in the control network model (Figure 4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Theta rhythm did not appear at any of the wide range of incoming excitation levels tested in the 'All PV+ B' network.
“we subjected the ‘All PV+ B’ network to a wide range of incoming excitation levels (Figure 6G). Theta rhythm did not appear at any of these excitation levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The phase preference of the axo-axonic cell in the model (163°) was closer to the anesthetized phase (185°) than to the awake phase (251°).
“the phase preference of the axo-axonic cell in the model (163°) was closer to the anesthetized phase (185°) than to the awake phase (251°)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Our simulations showed that the relatively rare pyramidal cell to pyramidal cell local excitatory connections were also required for isolated theta generation.
“While it may be expected that isolated theta generation would require local pyramidal cells to provide rhythmic, recurrent excitation to interneurons, our simulations additionally showed that the relatively rare pyramidal cell to pyramidal cell local excitatory connections were also required.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We had to increase the conductance of the GABAA synapse almost 300 times to achieve a similar charge transfer as that conveyed by the GABAB synapse.
“However, we had to increase the conductance of the GABAA synapse almost 300 times to achieve a similar charge transfer as that conveyed by the GABAB synapse.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Bistratified and O-LM cells fired close to the trough in the model, under anesthesia and in awake animals.
“bistratified and O-LM cells fired close to the trough in the model, under anesthesia and in awake animals”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The PV+ basket cells in the model displayed phase preferential firing (357°) closer to data reported from awake (289°-310°) than anesthetized animals (234°-271°).
“the PV+ basket cells in the model displayed phase preferential firing (357°) closer to data reported from awake (289°–310°) than anesthetized animals (234°–271°)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The CA1 model network exhibited phenomena that corresponded well with experimental results, for example, on the differential roles of PV+ basket cells and OLM cells.
“Our results obtained using the 0.65 Hz excitation indicated that the CA1 model network exhibited phenomena that corresponded well with experimental results, for example, on the differential roles of PV+ basket cells and OLM cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Theta oscillations appeared only within certain levels of excitatory afferent activity, around 0.65 Hz for the average firing rate of the Poisson-distributed spike trains.
“Importantly, theta oscillations appeared only within certain levels of excitatory afferent activity, around 0.65 Hz for the average firing rate of the Poisson-distributed spike trains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
When the 454,700 stimulating afferents in the model are active at a Poisson mean of 0.65 Hz, they generate approximately 37,900 incoming spikes per theta cycle, given a theta frequency of 7.8 Hz.
“When the 454,700 stimulating afferents in the model (representing the CA3 and entorhinal synapses; calculated in Bezaire and Soltesz (2013)) are active at a Poisson mean of 0.65 Hz, they generate approximately 37,900 incoming spikes / theta cycle, given a theta frequency of 7.8 Hz (Equation 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bezaire and Soltesz (2013) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Emergent theta and gamma oscillations and theta phase preferential firing are possible even as additional interneuron types are incorporated and the network is scaled up to full size with realistic connectivity including 5 billion synapses between the 300,000-plus cells of the network model.
“we demonstrated that emergent theta and gamma oscillations and theta phase preferential firing are possible even as additional interneuron types are incorporated and the network is scaled up to full size with realistic connectivity including 5 billion synapses between the 300,000-plus cells of our network model”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Results from the strictly data-driven, full-scale CA1 model are consistent with earlier models that demonstrated the basic ingredients capable of producing emergent network oscillations at a range of frequencies in microcircuits and small networks.
“Our results from the strictly data-driven, full-scale CA1 model are consistent with those of earlier models that elegantly demonstrated the basic ingredients capable of producing emergent network oscillations at a range of frequencies in microcircuits and small networks”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingnone given
The current CA1 network model produces results in agreement with experimental data.
“The current CA1 network model produces results in agreement with experimental data”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CCK+ cells had a steep response to the weight of the incoming afferent synapses, remaining silent until the weight was increased significantly and then spiking at a high rate.
“CCK+ cells had a steep response to the weight of the incoming afferent synapses, remaining silent until the weight was increased significantly and then spiking at a high rate”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Spontaneous theta-frequency LFP oscillations are present in the isolated whole CA1 preparation in vitro.
“recent reports indicate the presence of spontaneous theta-frequency LFP oscillations even in the isolated whole CA1 preparation in vitro (Goutagny et al., 2009; Amilhon et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The intra-CA1 mechanisms that may contribute to the generation of the theta rhythm are not well understood.
“However, the intra-CA1 mechanisms that may contribute to the generation of the theta rhythm are not well understood (Colgin, 2013, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Colgin, 2013, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The eight model interneuron types collectively comprise the majority (~70%) of known CA1 interneurons.
“These cell types collectively comprise the majority (~70%) of known CA1 interneurons (Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Reduced-scale models of large networks with realistic single cell electrophysiological properties remain silent unless synaptic strengths or numbers are arbitrarily increased beyond biologically relevant levels.
“smaller models of large networks with realistic single cell electrophysiological properties (e.g., input resistance and resting membrane potential) remain silent unless synaptic strengths or numbers are arbitrarily increased beyond the biologically relevant levels to compensate for fewer inputs to their model cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Study design and conductcitation
The electrophysiology and other properties of individual cells and synapses were based on experimental data.
“An important set of constraints was the electrophysiology and other properties of individual cells and synapses (Figure 2; Figure 2—source data 3–27; Tables 3 and 4) that were based on experimental data (Lee et al., 2016; Quattrocolo and Maccaferri, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lee et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Quattrocolo and Maccaferri, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
Synaptic kinetics, amplitudes, and locations on the postsynaptic cell were constrained using experimental data.
“We used experimental data to constrain the synaptic kinetics, amplitudes, and locations on the postsynaptic cell (Figure 1E, 2K and L).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
The afferent divergence and convergence onto the cells were anatomically patterned, maintaining the topographical arrangement seen experimentally.
“The afferent divergence and convergence onto the cells were also anatomically patterned, maintaining the topographical arrangement seen experimentally (Hongo et al., 2015), for a total of 5.19 billion synaptic connections in the model network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hongo et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The CA1 circuit has an intrinsic ability to generate some form of theta waves even without rhythmic external inputs.
“Therefore, the latter studies suggest an intrinsic ability of the CA1 circuit to generate some form of theta waves even without rhythmic external inputs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
This is the first strictly data-driven, full-scale computational network model of the CA1 that exhibits spontaneous theta rhythm without rhythmic synaptic inputs.
“To our knowledge, this is the first strictly data-driven, full-scale computational network model of the CA1 that exhibits spontaneous theta rhythm without rhythmic synaptic inputs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The model was capable of reproducing the experimentally observed relatively low-firing frequencies for the principal cells during theta oscillations in vivo.
“Therefore, the model was capable of reproducing the experimentally observed relatively low-firing frequencies for the principal cells during theta oscillations in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The missing 30% of interneurons do not qualitatively alter the generation of theta oscillations in the model.
- Interpretationown data
The model was sufficiently well-constrained by experimental data to generate theta and gamma oscillations on its own, without extrinsic rhythmic inputs or deliberate tuning of intrinsic parameters.
“These results demonstrate that, in spite of gaps in our knowledge, our model was sufficiently well-constrained by experimental data that it generated theta and gamma oscillations on its own, without extrinsic rhythmic inputs or deliberate tuning of intrinsic parameters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The model parameters that could not be constrained by experimental data do not critically affect the model's conclusions.
- Interpretationreasoning
Inhibition received by the pyramidal cells in the model was probably weaker than in the biological situation.
“Therefore, these lesser-known interneurons were not included in the model, which meant that inhibition received by the pyramidal cells was probably weaker than in the biological situation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The missing 30% of interneurons do not qualitatively alter the generation of theta oscillations in the model.
- Premisecitation
These cells received substantial excitatory inputs from local CA1 pyramidal cells both in the biological state and in the model.
“Since these cells received substantial excitatory inputs from local CA1 pyramidal cells both in the biological state and in the model (Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Theta-preferential discharges are to a large extent determined by the wiring properties of the CA1 circuit itself.
“A clear majority of the interneuronal types in the model showed phase preferences similar to the in vivo condition where rhythmically discharging afferent inputs are present, indicating that theta-preferential discharges are to a large extent determined by the wiring properties of the CA1 circuit itself.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The phase preferences of interneurons in anesthetized animals are comparable to those in the model's conditions for the purpose of validating the model.
- Interpretationcitation
During theta oscillations in vivo, PV+ basket cells and ivy cells may be strongly driven by CA3 afferents active during the late falling phase of the theta cycle.
“suggesting that during theta oscillations in vivo these cells may be strongly driven by CA3 afferents active during the late falling phase of the theta cycle (Colgin and Moser, 2010)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Colgin and Moser, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The firing of the first group of interneurons in the isolated CA1 model was probably driven by the pyramidal cell discharges around the theta trough.
“their firing in the isolated CA1 model was probably driven by the pyramidal cell discharges around the theta trough.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The differing phase preferences of the second group were most likely due to a combination of weak or non-existent excitatory inputs from local CA1 pyramidal cells and inhibition from the interneurons that prominently discharged around the theta trough.
“Their differing phase preferences were most likely due to a combination of weak or non-existent excitatory inputs from local CA1 pyramidal cells and inhibition from the interneurons that prominently discharged around the theta trough.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Each pyramidal cell contacts 197 other pyramidal cells in the CA1.
“each pyramidal cell contacts 197 other pyramidal cells in the CA1; Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The recurrent collaterals of pyramidal cells play a key role in theta oscillations.
“indicating that the recurrent collaterals of pyramidal cells play a key role in theta oscillations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
While a hypothetical theta regime somewhere in the parameter space of low-diversity configurations could not be ruled out, any theta solution space would likely be smaller and more elusive than was able to be determined in the control configuration.
“While we could not rule out a hypothetical theta regime somewhere in the parameter space of such low-diversity configurations, any theta solution space would likely be smaller and more elusive than we were able to determine in the control configuration (Figure 6A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The parameter space explored for low-diversity configurations is sufficient to conclude that interneuronal diversity is necessary for spontaneous theta oscillations.
- Interpretationown data
In agreement with previous predictions, the perturbation experiments suggested that neurogliaform cells were a necessary component for spontaneous theta to arise in the isolated CA1.
“In agreement with previous predictions (Capogna, 2011), the perturbation experiments described above suggested that neurogliaform cells were a necessary component for spontaneous theta to arise in the isolated CA1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Capogna, 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
We produced a biologically detailed, full-scale CA1 network model constrained by extensive experimental data.
“We produced a biologically detailed, full-scale CA1 network model constrained by extensive experimental data (Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Taken together, these results indicated, for the first time, that interneuronal diversity itself is an important factor in the emergence of spontaneous theta oscillations from the CA1 network.
“Taken together, these results indicated, for the first time, that interneuronal diversity itself is an important factor in the emergence of spontaneous theta oscillations from the CA1 network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The parameter space explored for low-diversity configurations is sufficient to conclude that interneuronal diversity is necessary for spontaneous theta oscillations.
- Interpretationreasoning
The model has the capacity to process a biologically realistic number of spike inputs per cycle while maintaining the theta rhythm.
“Thus, the model has the capacity to process a biologically realistic number of spike inputs per cycle while maintaining the theta rhythm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Our results also highlighted the importance of the recurrent excitatory collaterals from CA1 pyramidal cells in theta generation in the model of the isolated CA1 network.
“In addition to identifying key roles for certain inhibitory components (PV+ interneurons, neurogliaform cells, GABAB, and interneuron diversity), our results also highlighted the importance of the recurrent excitatory collaterals from CA1 pyramidal cells in theta generation in the model of the isolated CA1 network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Experimental data on the isolated CA1 preparation were obtained from both rat and mouse.
“the experimental data on the isolated CA1 preparation were obtained from both rat (Goutagny et al., 2009) and mouse (Amilhon et al., 2015)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
The modeling results provided the insight that GABAB receptors may play important roles in slow oscillations such as the theta rhythm not because their slow kinetics pace the oscillations, but because their slow kinetics enable a massive charge transfer.
“The modeling results also provided the interesting insight that GABAB receptors may play important roles in slow oscillations such as the theta rhythm not because their slow kinetics pace the oscillations, but because their slow kinetics enable a massive charge transfer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Some of the electrophysiology data used for constructing the single cell models came from the mouse.
“some of the electrophysiology data used for constructing the single cell models (Appendix) came from the mouse”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
The model is fundamentally a model of the rat CA1 in terms of cell numbers and connectivity.
“our model is fundamentally a model of the rat CA1 (e.g., in terms of cell numbers and connectivity; see Table 3 in Bezaire and Soltesz [2013])”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bezaire and Soltesz [2013] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Slow GABAB synapses were not necessary for theta as long as their large charge was carried by the fast GABAA synapses.
“This insight was illuminated by the fact that slow GABAB synapses were not necessary for theta as long as their large charge was carried by the fast GABAA synapses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
All the model configurations and simulation result data sets used in this work are available online.
“all the model configurations and simulation result data sets used in this work are available online”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bezaire et al., 2016b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The theta that emerged from the model most closely resembled the atropine resistant form.
“it is likely that the theta that emerged from our model most closely resembled the atropine resistant form”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
The cell number and connectivity parameters were exactly as reported previously in our in-depth quantitative assessment of anatomical data about the CA1.
“The cell number and connectivity parameters were exactly as we reported previously in our in-depth quantitative assessment of anatomical data about the CA1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 23
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 37
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn simulations with scaled-up inhibition, only 1% of the pyramidal cells were active, and they fired at a low rate of 1.8 Hz.
“In simulations with the model containing this rationally scaled up inhibition, only 1% of the pyramidal cells were active, and they fired at a low rate of 1.8 Hz (data not shown), closely resembling the in vivo condition (Soltesz and Deschênes, 1993; Robbe et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Soltesz and Deschênes, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Robbe et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was a correlation between the phase preference and the strength of modulation, with the cells discharging around the trough all showing strong modulation of firing.
“there was a correlation between the phase preference and the strength of modulation (Figure 5C; see Materials and methods), with the cells discharging around the trough all showing strong modulation of firing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTheta phase preference and theta modulation level were correlated; better modulated cell types spiked closer to the LFP analog trough near the phase preference of pyramidal cells.
“Theta phase preference and theta modulation level were correlated; better modulated cell types spiked closer to the LFP analog trough near the phase preference of pyramidal cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The experimental phase preferences from anesthetized rats are comparable to the model's conditions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen the excitation level increased beyond 0.80 Hz, theta power started to drop significantly as the oscillation frequency rose out of theta range, evolving into a beta oscillation.
“when the excitation level increased beyond 0.80 Hz, theta power also started to drop significantly as the oscillation frequency rose out of theta range (Figure 6 and Figure 6—figure supplement 1; Figure 6—source data 1–2), evolving into a beta oscillation (Engel and Fries, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Engel and Fries, 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCell type-specific perturbations of the network showed that each interneuronal type contributed uniquely to the spontaneous theta oscillation, and that the presence of diverse inhibitory dynamics was a necessary condition for sustained theta oscillations.
“Cell type-specific perturbations of the network showed that each interneuronal type contributed uniquely to the spontaneous theta oscillation, and that the presence of diverse inhibitory dynamics was a necessary condition for sustained theta oscillations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenNone of the model neurons in our model CA1 network are spontaneously active.
“As none of the model neurons in our model CA1 network are spontaneously active”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn rodents, hippocampal theta is a 5-10 Hz oscillation in the local field potential (LFP) and neuronal firing probabilities, occurring during locomotion and in REM sleep.
“In rodents, hippocampal theta is a 5–10 Hz oscillation in the local field potential (LFP) and neuronal firing probabilities (Soltesz and Deschênes, 1993; Lee et al., 1994; Ylinen et al., 1995; Klausberger and Somogyi, 2008; Varga et al., 2012, 2014), occurring during locomotion and in REM sleep (Buzsáki, 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningFull-scale models of mammalian circuits avoid the connectivity scaling tradeoff that besets reduced-scale models.
“In principle, such full-scale models of mammalian circuits comprising hundreds of thousands of neurons of distinct types advantageously avoid the connectivity scaling tradeoff that besets reduced-scale models”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationCell type-specific connectivity data, including cell numbers and convergence/divergence values, were taken without alteration from Bezaire and Soltesz (2013).
“Cell type-specific connectivity data, including cell numbers (Figure 1D) and convergence and divergence values (Figure 1E; Figure 1—figure supplement 1 and Table 1) were taken without alteration from our previously published, in-depth, quantitative assessment of the CA1 circuit (Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe remaining 30% of interneurons were not included in the model due to paucity of quantitative data.
“The remaining 30% of the interneurons were not included in the model due to paucity of quantitative data (Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPV+ cells receive a high number of excitatory inputs on their dendrites compared to other interneuron classes.
“note that PV+ cells receive a high number of excitatory inputs on their dendrites compared to other interneuron classes (Gulyás et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gulyás et al., 1999 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDistinct interneuronal types exhibit characteristic, cell-type-specific preferred phases of firing during theta oscillations in vivo.
“As mentioned above, distinct interneuronal types, defined based on their selective axonal innervation patterns of the postsynaptic domains of pyramidal cells, exhibit characteristic, cell-type-specific preferred phases of firing during theta oscillations in vivo (Klausberger et al., 2003; 2004, 2005; Ferraguti et al., 2005; Jinno et al., 2007; Fuentealba et al., 2008; Varga et al., 2012; Lapray et”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe intracellular membrane potential oscillations of pyramidal cells to a large extent generate and underlie the extracellular LFP signal during theta oscillations.
“As expected, the numerically dominant pyramidal cells, whose intracellular membrane potential oscillations to a large extent generate and underlie the extracellular LFP signal during theta oscillations (Buzsáki et al., 2012), preferentially discharged around the trough 0o/360o of the LFP analog theta rhythm (Figure 5A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Buzsáki et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKey roles for inter-pyramidal cell excitatory synapses within CA1 have been suggested for sharp wave ripple oscillations as well.
“key roles for inter-pyramidal cell excitatory synapses within CA1 have been suggested for sharp wave ripple oscillations as well (Maier et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maier et al., 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWhile the synaptic-cellular organization of the CA1 circuit enables the intrinsic, within-CA1 generation of theta waves, the circuit is predisposed to exhibit theta oscillations only under particular excitatory input conditions.
“These data indicate that while synaptic-cellular organization of the CA1 circuit enables the intrinsic, within-CA1 generation of theta waves, the circuit is predisposed to exhibit theta oscillations only under particular excitatory input conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDiverse sources of inhibition from the various interneuronal types are believed to enable networks to achieve more complex behaviors, including oscillations.
“Since the diverse sources of inhibition from the various interneuronal types are believed to enable networks to achieve more complex behaviors, including oscillations (Soltesz, 2006; Rotstein et al., 2005; Kepecs and Fishell, 2014)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe recurrent collaterals of pyramidal cells contact mostly interneurons and, less frequently, other pyramidal cells.
“First, we studied the role of the recurrent collaterals of pyramidal cells, which contact mostly interneurons and, less frequently, other pyramidal cells (Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPV+ basket cells have been implicated in theta generation in vivo.
“we focused on PV+ basket cells, which have been implicated in theta generation in vivo (Soltesz and Deschênes, 1993; Buzsáki, 2002; Stark et al., 2013; Hu et al., 2014)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThese abilities may serve to maintain the stability and robustness of the theta oscillation mechanism as it operates in vivo in diverse behavioral states.
“These abilities may serve to maintain the stability and robustness of the theta oscillation mechanism as it operates in vivo in diverse behavioral states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMuting the neurogliaform cells strongly disrupted the theta oscillations not because the theta oscillations required the slow kinetics of GABAB IPSPs specifically, but because the slow kinetics enabled a large total charge transfer.
“Therefore, muting the neurogliaform cells strongly disrupted the theta oscillations not because the theta oscillations required the slow kinetics of GABAB IPSPs specifically, but because the slow kinetics enabled a large total charge transfer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationNeurogliaform cells evoked mixed GABAA,B postsynaptic events, whereas the model ivy cells only triggered GABAA IPSPs.
“These two model interneuron groups mainly differed in that the neurogliaform cells evoked mixed GABAA,B postsynaptic events (Price et al., 2005), whereas the model ivy cells only triggered GABAA IPSPs (in agreement with a lack of evidence for ivy cell-evoked GABAB IPSPs).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Price et al., 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAlthough PV basket cells appear to be important for theta-generation both in the biological and the model CA1 network, endowing all interneurons with PV basket cell-like properties does not lead to a network configuration conducive to theta oscillations.
“Therefore, although PV basket cells appear to be important for theta-generation both in the biological and the model CA1 network, endowing all interneurons with PV basket cell-like properties does not lead to a network configuration conducive to theta oscillations (Hendrickson et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hendrickson et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe presence of diverse interneuronal types and the intrinsic circuitry of the CA1 network are sufficient and necessary to enable the isolated CA1 to oscillate at spontaneous theta rhythms while supporting distinct phase preferences of each class of hippocampal neuron.
“these model results generally suggest that the presence of diverse interneuronal types and the intrinsic circuitry of the CA1 network are sufficient and necessary to enable the isolated CA1 to oscillate at spontaneous theta rhythms while supporting distinct phase preferences of each class of hippocampal neuron.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAbout 250,000 principal cells from ipsilateral ECIII synapse onto the CA1 region, and approximately 2% of these cells are active per theta cycle at a low firing rate, so ECIII cells could provide 5000 input spikes to ipsilateral CA1.
“About 250,000 principal cells from ipsilateral ECIII synapse onto the CA1 region (Andersen et al., 2006), and approximately 2% of these cells are active per theta cycle at a low firing rate (Csicsvari et al., 1999; Mizuseki et al., 2009). Therefore, ECIII cells could provide 5000 input spikes to ipsilateral CA1 (Equation 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSuch a large conductance is not biologically realistic, indicating that the key role for GABAB synapses may be to allow the large synaptic charge transfer via a temporal distribution.
“Such a large conductance is not biologically realistic, indicating that the key role for GABAB synapses may be to allow the large synaptic charge transfer via a temporal distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAbout 37,750 spikes per theta cycle arrive from ipsilateral CA3 and entorhinal cortex to the CA1 network in vivo, which is close to the modeling results indicating that robust theta emerged when the CA1 network model received approximately 37,900 afferent spikes per theta cycle.
“Therefore, about 37,750 spikes per theta cycle arrive from ipsilateral CA3 and entorhinal cortex to the CA1 network in vivo, which is reassuringly close to the our modeling results indicating that robust theta emerged when the CA1 network model received approximately 37,900 afferent spikes per theta cycle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationPhase preferential firing may aid information processing tasks by providing order and allowing multiple channels of information to be processed in parallel.
“In turn, phase preferential firing may aid information processing tasks by providing order and allowing multiple channels of information to be processed in parallel (Jensen and Lisman, 2000; Hasselmo et al., 2002; Womelsdorf et al., 2007; Schomburg et al., 2014; Jeewajee et al., 2014; Maris et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe primary importance of pyramidal cell inputs in driving bistratified and O-LM interneurons to fire during theta oscillations under all conditions.
“potentially indicating the primary importance of pyramidal cell inputs in driving these interneurons to fire during theta oscillations under all conditions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe importance of GABAB receptors has also been indicated by a number of recent experimental studies, for example, in the modulation of theta and gamma oscillations, setting of spike timing of neuron types during theta, and playing a role in cortical oscillations and memory processes.
“Indeed, the importance of GABAB receptors has also been indicated by a number of recent experimental studies, for example, in the modulation of theta and gamma oscillations (Kohl and Paulsen, 2010), setting of spike timing of neuron types during theta (Kohl and Paulsen, 2010), and playing a role in cortical oscillations and memory processes (Craig and McBain, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kohl and Paulsen, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Craig and McBain, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere are 204,700 pyramidal cells in ipsilateral CA3, giving an estimated 32,750 spikes from ipsilateral CA3 per theta cycle.
“We previously estimated 204,700 pyramidal cells in ipsilateral CA3 (Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013), giving an estimated 32,750 spikes from ipsilateral CA3 per theta cycle (Equation 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe theta rhythm is thought to be important for organizing disparate memory tasks.
“The theta rhythm is thought to be important for organizing disparate memory tasks (Lisman and Idiart, 1995; Hasselmo et al., 2002; Hasselmo, 2005; Lisman and Jensen, 2013; Siegle and Wilson, 2014)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationA CA1 network which has evolved a predisposition to oscillate at theta and gamma frequencies may enable more efficient processing of the phasic input it receives in vivo.
“a CA1 network which has evolved a predisposition to oscillate at theta and gamma frequencies may enable more efficient processing of the phasic input it receives in vivo (Akam and Kullmann, 2012; Fries, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe simulations unexpectedly revealed that interneuronal diversity itself may also be important in theta generation, since conversion of all interneurons into fast spiking PV+ basket cells did not result in a network that was conducive for the emergence of theta, in spite of the key role of the PV+ basket cells in hippocampal oscillations.
“In addition, the simulations unexpectedly revealed that interneuronal diversity itself may also be important in theta generation, since conversion of all interneurons into fast spiking PV+ basket cells did not result in a network that was conducive for the emergence of theta, in spite of the key role of the PV+ basket cells in hippocampal oscillations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The parameter space explored for low-diversity configurations is sufficient to conclude that interneuronal diversity is necessary for spontaneous theta oscillations.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe biological CA1 network receives most of its input from CA3 and entorhinal cortical layer III (ECIII), and about 4% of CA3 pyramidal cells fire up to four spikes per theta wave.
“The biological CA1 network receives most of its input from CA3 and entorhinal cortical layer III (ECIII), and it has been estimated that about 4% of CA3 pyramidal cells fire up to four spikes per theta wave (Gasparini and Magee, 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gasparini and Magee, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationSimTracker is freely available and works with the model code to support each step of the modeling process.
“we have made freely available our custom software SimTracker (RRID:SCR_014735) that works with the model code to support each step of the modeling process”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bezaire et al., 2016a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataBoth forms of theta benefit from occurring in a network that is predisposed to oscillate at the theta frequency.
“it also plausible that both forms of theta benefit from occurring in a network that is predisposed to oscillate at the theta frequency, as the model network results suggested”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe model can be run on the Neuroscience Gateway, an online portal for accessing supercomputers that does not require technical knowledge of supercomputing.
“the model can be run on the Neuroscience Gateway, an online portal for accessing supercomputers that does not require technical knowledge of supercomputing”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAtropine sensitive theta requires intact, rhythmic cholinergic inputs.
“the latter requires intact, rhythmic cholinergic inputs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kramis et al., 1975 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSuch models are not subject to the connectivity scaling tradeoff wherein smaller networks have unrealistically low levels of input or unrealistically high connectivity between cells.
“Such models are not subject to the connectivity scaling tradeoff wherein smaller networks have unrealistically low levels of input or unrealistically high connectivity between cells”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe resource intensive process of designing a detailed, large-scale model is offset by its potential usage in numerous ways by a multitude of groups.
“Our previous model has demonstrated how the resource intensive process of designing a detailed, large-scale model is offset by its potential usage in numerous ways by a multitude of groups”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe current CA1 network model provides specific testable predictions that enable focused design of future experiments.
“It provides specific testable predictions that enable focused design of future experiments”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe previously built dentate gyrus model was used by several groups to study disparate topics including epilepsy, network mechanisms of inhibition and excitability, simulation optimization, and modeling software.
“Previously, we built a dentate gyrus model to study epileptic network dynamics (Santhakumar et al., 2005; Morgan and Soltesz, 2008) that was then used by several groups to study disparate topics including epilepsy, network mechanisms of inhibition and excitability, simulation optimization, and modeling software”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere is an increasing recognition in neurobiology that we must compile our collective experimental observations of the brain into something more cohesive and synergistic than what is being conveyed in individual research articles.
“there is an increasing recognition in neurobiology that we must compile our collective experimental observations of the brain into something more cohesive and synergistic than what is being conveyed in individual research articles”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAtropine resistant theta is typically associated with walking and may not be dependent on neuromodulatory inputs.
“the former is typically associated with walking and may not be dependent on neuromodulatory inputs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kramis et al., 1975 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe model is public, well documented, and well characterized in experimentally relevant terms.
“The model is public, well documented, and also well characterized in experimentally relevant terms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThese comprehensive databases create the opportunity to build strongly biology-inspired models of entire networks, with all the cells and synapses explicitly represented.
“These comprehensive databases create the opportunity to build strongly biology-inspired models of entire networks, with all the cells and synapses explicitly represented”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe behavior of each cell type was characterized using a current injection sweep that matched experimental conditions reported in the literature.
“The behavior of each cell type was characterized using a current injection sweep that matched experimental conditions reported in the literature”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIn vivo theta rhythm has been reported to be either atropine resistant or atropine sensitive.
“the in vivo theta rhythm has been reported to be either atropine resistant or atropine sensitive”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kramis et al., 1975 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningTo ensure the model cells exhibited robust biophysical behavior in a wide range of network conditions, a standard, thorough characterization strategy was implemented for each cell type.
“To ensure the model cells exhibited robust biophysical behavior in a wide range of network conditions, we implemented a standard, thorough characterization strategy for each cell type”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe developed model is flexible and biologically relevant and uses computational resources efficiently.
“We developed a flexible and biologically relevant model that uses computational resources efficiently”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe published experimental data were compared side-by-side with model cell simulation results.
“The published experimental data were compared side-by-side with model cell simulation results”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataReference simulations and LFP analog calculations with the inner radius set to 200 μm and 500 μm obtained results identical with those in Figures 3 and 4 (where an inner radius of 100 μm was used), except for negligible increases in the theta oscillation power found in the LFP analog spectrogram.
“We performed reference simulations and LFP analog calculations with the inner radius set to 200 μm and 500 μm and obtained results identical with those in Figures 3 and 4 (where an inner radius of 100 μm was used), except for negligible increases in the theta oscillation power found in the LFP analog spectrogram”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe stimulation patterns used in the present study were not representative of the information content thought to be carried via inputs from CA3 and entorhinal cortex.
“the stimulation patterns used in the present study were not representative of the information content thought to be carried via inputs from those areas”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The CA1 area is one of the most extensively studied brain regions, with abundant anatomical and electrophysiological data about its organization.
“Because the CA1 area is one of the most extensively studied brain regions, there are abundant anatomical and electrophysiological data about its organization, making it a logical choice for the development of a full-scale model.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The model parameters that could not be constrained by experimental data do not critically affect the model's conclusions.
“In addition, the remaining parameters that could not be constrained by experimental data were documented, with the assumptions used to arrive at them explicitly listed in Table 2 of Bezaire and Soltesz (2013) and additional parameter calculations described in the Appendix of the present paper, section 'Inhibitory connectivity'.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The missing 30% of interneurons do not qualitatively alter the generation of theta oscillations in the model.
“The remaining 30% of the interneurons were not included in the model due to paucity of quantitative data (Bezaire and Soltesz, 2013).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The experimental phase preferences from anesthetized rats are comparable to the model's conditions.
“Firing probability by cell type as a function of theta phase for (A) model and (B) experimental cells under anesthesia (histograms adapted with permission from Figure 2, Figure 5B left, and Figure 6F respectively from Klausberger and Somogyi, 2008; Fuentealba et al., 2008; Fuentealba et al., 2010).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The phase preferences of interneurons in anesthetized animals are comparable to those in the model's conditions for the purpose of validating the model.
“because no data are available on the phase preferential firing of morphologically identified interneurons from the isolated CA1 preparation, comparison is made here with results from anesthetized animals, from which the most complete data sets are available”
The paper relies on this without support.
The parameter space explored for low-diversity configurations is sufficient to conclude that interneuronal diversity is necessary for spontaneous theta oscillations.
“While we could not rule out a hypothetical theta regime somewhere in the parameter space of such low-diversity configurations, any theta solution space would likely be smaller and more elusive than we were able to determine in the control configuration (Figure 6A).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The phase of LFP theta recorded in the stratum radiatum is approximately 180 degrees out of phase with the pyramidal cell layer theta used in this paper.
“note that Ferguson and colleagues used LFP theta recorded in the stratum radiatum as reference, which is approximately 180 degrees out of phase with the pyramidal cell layer theta used in this paper”
The paper relies on this without support.
Model neurons sometimes behave much differently than expected when subjected to current sweep protocols or synaptic inputs that are outside the range of the original protocols used to construct the model.
“Model neurons sometimes behave much differently than expected when subjected to current sweep protocols or synaptic inputs that are outside the range of the original protocols used to construct the model”
The authors state this as an assumption.
All available incoming inhibitory synapses onto interneurons in a layer have an equal chance of being innervated by the available inhibitory boutons targeting interneurons in that layer.
“All available incoming inhibitory synapses onto interneurons in a layer have an equal chance of being innervated by the available inhibitory boutons targeting interneurons in that layer”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no reported evidence for major, systematic differences in key parameters such as the phase specific firing of rat and mouse interneurons in vivo.
“there is no reported evidence for major, systematic differences in key parameters such as the phase specific firing of rat and mouse interneurons in vivo”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fast-spiking CA1 interneurons have been mechanistically linked to the emergence of the LFP theta rhythm and the entrainment of pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus.
“Fast-spiking (FS) CA1 interneurons (classically referred to as “theta cells”53) have been mechanistically linked to the emergence of the LFP theta rhythm and the entrainment of pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus42,54–56.”
From Place and behavioral modulation of hippocampal neurons during immobility (2026) · cites this paper as [54]
Cites
Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.
Squire, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.195 · Cited by 5,376 · see citing works
The origin of extracellular fields and currents — EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes
Buzsáki, G., Anastassiou, C. A., & Koch, C. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3241 · Cited by 4,225 · see citing works
Theta oscillations in the hippocampus
Buzsáki, G. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00586-x · Cited by 3,332 · see citing works
Beta-band oscillations—Signalling the status quo?
Engel, A. K., & Fries, P. (2010) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.015 · Cited by 2,953 · see citing works
Rhythms for cognition: communication through coherence
Fries, P. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.034 · Cited by 2,725 · see citing works
Neuronal Diversity and Temporal Dynamics: The Unity of Hippocampal Circuit Operations
Klausberger, T., & Somogyi, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1149381 · Cited by 2,050 · see citing works
Place Cells, Grid Cells, and the Brain's Spatial Representation System
Moser, E. I., Kropff, E., & Moser, M.-B. (2008) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.061307.090723 · Cited by 1,934 · see citing works
Memory, navigation and theta rhythm in the hippocampal-entorhinal system
Buzsáki, G., & Moser, E. I. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3304 · Cited by 1,847 · see citing works
Reconstruction and Simulation of Neocortical Microcircuitry
Markram, H., Muller, E., Ramaswamy, S., Reimann, M. W., Abdellah, M., Sanchez, C. A., Ailamaki, A., Alonso-Nanclares, L., Antille, N., Arsever, S., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.029 · Cited by 1,705 · see citing works
Lisman, J. E., & Jensen, O. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.007 · Cited by 1,609 · see citing works
Gamma (40-100 Hz) oscillation in the hippocampus of the behaving rat
Bragin, A., Jando, G., Nadasdy, Z., Hetke, J., Wise, K., & Buzsaki, G. (1995) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-01-00047.1995 · Cited by 1,527 · see citing works
Storage of 7 +/- 2 short-term memories in oscillatory subcycles
Lisman, J. E., & Idiart, M. A. P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7878473 · Cited by 1,471 · see citing works
Frequency of gamma oscillations routes flow of information in the hippocampus
Colgin, L. L., Denninger, T., Fyhn, M., Hafting, T., Bonnevie, T., Jensen, O. B., Moser, M., & Moser, E. I. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08573 · Cited by 1,425 · see citing works
Modulation of Neuronal Interactions Through Neuronal Synchronization
Womelsdorf, T., Schoffelen, J.-M., Oostenveld, R., Singer, W., Desimone, R., Engel, A. K., & Fries, P. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1139597 · Cited by 1,367 · see citing works
Brain-state- and cell-type-specific firing of hippocampal interneurons in vivo
Klausberger, T., Magill, P. J., Márton, L. F., Roberts, J. D. B., Cobden, P. M., Buzsáki, G., & Somogyi, P. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01374 · Cited by 1,345 · see citing works
Carnevale, N. T., & Hines, M. L. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511541612 · Cited by 1,199 · see citing works
Hu, H., Gan, J., & Jonas, P. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1255263 · Cited by 1,197 · see citing works
(2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195100273.001.0001 · Cited by 1,186 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…cells 0:04 cell fraction 4 spikes=cell¼ 32;752 spikes (2) About 250,000 principal cells from ipsilateral ECIII synapse onto the CA1 region (Andersen et al., 2006), and approximately 2% of these cells are active per theta cycle at a low firing rate (Csicsvari et al., 1999; Mizuseki et…”
BackgroundInterneuron cell types are fit to function
Kepecs, A., & Fishell, G. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12983 · Cited by 1,110 · see citing works
Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations
Jensen, O., & Colgin, L. L. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.003 · Cited by 991 · see citing works
Magee, J. C. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-19-07613.1998 · Cited by 981 · see citing works
Oscillatory coupling of hippocampal pyramidal cells and interneurons in the behaving rat
Csicsvari, J., Hirase, H., Czurkó, A., Mamiya, A., & Buzsáki, G. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-01-00274.1999 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Megı́as, M., Emri, Z., Freund, T. F., & Gulyás, A. I. (2001) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00496-6 · Cited by 950 · see citing works
Theta-gamma coupling increases during the learning of item-context associations
Tort, A. B. L., Komorowski, R. W., Manns, J. R., Kopell, N. J., & Eichenbaum, H. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0911331106 · Cited by 919 · see citing works
Ca2+-activated K+ currents in neurones: types, physiological roles and modulation
Sah, P. (1996) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(96)80026-9 · Cited by 892 · see citing works
Carnevale, N. T., & Hines, M. L. (2006) · Cited by 885 · see citing works
Hasselmo, M. E., Bodelón, C., & Wyble, B. P. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602317318965 · Cited by 875 · see citing works
Sejnowsri, T. J., Christof Koch, A., Patricia, & Churchland, S. (2014) · Progress in molecular biology and translational science · doi:10.1016/c2012-0-00157-3 · Cited by 799 · see citing works
Kramis, R., Vanderwolf, C. H., & Bland, B. H. (1975) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/0014-4886(75)90195-8 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Cross-Frequency Phase–Phase Coupling between Theta and Gamma Oscillations in the Hippocampus
Belluscio, M. A., Mizuseki, K., Schmidt, R., Kempter, R., & Buzsáki, G. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4122-11.2012 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
Chapter 12 Potassium currents in hippocampal pyramidal cells
Storm, J. F. (1990) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)61248-0 · Cited by 743 · see citing works
Varieties of Calcium-Activated Potassium Channels
Latorre, R., Oberhauser, A. F., Labarca, P. P., & Alvarez, O. A. (1989) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.51.030189.002125 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
Mizuseki, K., Sirota, A., Pastalkova, E., & Buzsáki, G. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.08.037 · Cited by 718 · see citing works
Rhythms of the hippocampal network
Colgin, L. L. (2016) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.21 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Mechanisms and functions of theta rhythms
Colgin, L. L. (2013) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170330 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Hasselmo, M. E. (2005) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20116 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Hippocampal theta activity following selective lesion of the septal cholinergic systeM
Lee, M., Chrobak, J. J., Attila Gabor, S. I. K., Wiley, R. G., & Buzsáki, G. (1994) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(94)90341-7 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Hippocampal network patterns of activity in the mouse
Buzsáki, G., Buhl, D. L., Harris, K. D., Csicsvari, J., Czéh, B., & Morozov, A. (2003) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00669-3 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
The mechanisms and functions of spontaneous neurotransmitter release
Kavalali, E. T. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3875 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Gulyás, A. I., Megı́as, M., Emri, Z., & Freund, T. F. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-22-10082.1999 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Klausberger, T., Marton, L. F., O'Neill, J., Huck, J. H. J., Dalezios, Y., Fuentealba, P., Suen, W. Y., Papp, E., Kaneko, T., Watanabe, M., et al. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3269-05.2005 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Theta Phase Segregation of Input-Specific Gamma Patterns in Entorhinal-Hippocampal Networks
Schomburg, E. W., Fernández-Ruiz, A., Mizuseki, K., Berényi, A., Anastassiou, C. A., Koch, C., & Buzsáki, G. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.051 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
B, T. J. S. A., Christof Koch, A., & Churchland, P. S. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3045969 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
Pharmacological upregulation of h-channels reduces the excitability of pyramidal neuron dendrites
Poolos, N. P., Migliore, M., & Johnston, D. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn891 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Chen, K., Aradi, I., Thon, N., Eghbal-Ahmadi, M., Baram, T. Z., & Soltész, I. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/85480 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Soltész, I., & Deschênes, M. (1993) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1993.70.1.97 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Klausberger, T., Márton, L. F., Baude, A., Roberts, J. D. B., Magill, P. J., & Somogyi, P. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1159 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Ylinen, A., Soltész, I., Bragin, A., Penttonen, M., Attila Gabor, S. I. K., & Buzsáki, G. (1995) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.450050110 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Gamma Oscillations in the Hippocampus
Colgin, L. L., & Moser, E. I. (2010) · Physiology · doi:10.1152/physiol.00021.2010 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Bezaire, M. J., & Soltesz, I. (2013) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22141 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Self-citationMoczydlowski, E. G., & Latorre, R. (1983) · The Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.82.4.511 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Neuronal Diversity in GABAergic Long-Range Projections from the Hippocampus
Jinno, S., Klausberger, T., Marton, L. F., Dalezios, Y., Roberts, J. D. B., Fuentealba, P., Bushong, E. A., Henze, D., Buzsáki, G., & Somogyi, P. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1847-07.2007 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Parvalbumin-Positive Basket Cells Differentiate among Hippocampal Pyramidal Cells
Lee, S.-H., Marchionni, I., Bezaire, M., Varga, C., Danielson, N., Lovett-Barron, M., Losonczy, A., & Soltesz, I. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.034 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Self-citationMaccaferri, G., David, J., Roberts, B., Szucs, P., Cottingham, C. A., & Somogyi, P. (2000) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-3-00091.x · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Role for a cortical input to hippocampal area CA1 in the consolidation of a long-term memory
Remondes, M., & Schuman, E. M. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02965 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Fuhrmann, F., Justus, D., Sosulina, L., Kaneko, H., Beutel, T., Friedrichs, D., Schoch, S., Schwarz, M. K., Fuhrmann, M., & Remy, S. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.001 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Morgan, R. J., & Soltesz, I. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801372105 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Migliore, M., Hoffman, D. A., Magee, J. C., & Johnston, D. (1999) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1023/a:1008906225285 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Cannabinoids reveal importance of spike timing coordination in hippocampal function
Robbe, D., Montgomery, S. M., Thome, A., Rueda-Orozco, P. E., McNaughton, B. L., & Buzsaki, G. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1801 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Inhibition-induced theta resonance in cortical circuits
Stark, E., Eichler, R., Roux, L., Fujisawa, S., Rotstein, H. G., & Buzsáki, G. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.033 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Principles of Computational Modelling in Neuroscience
Sterratt, D., Graham, B., Gillies, A., & Willshaw, D. (2011) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511975899 · Cited by 320 · cited 1× · see citing works
“DOI: 10.7554/eLife.18566 1 of 106 for fewer inputs to their model cells (e.g., [Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen et al., 2007; Sterratt et al., 2011]).”
BackgroundInfluentialJensen, O. B., & Lisman, J. E. (2000) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2602 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Self-generated theta oscillations in the hippocampus
Goutagny, R., Jackson, J., & Williams, S. (2009) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2440 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
State-Dependent Dendritic Computation in Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Neurons
Gasparini, S., & Magee, J. C. (2006) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4428-05.2006 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
A Blueprint for the Spatiotemporal Origins of Mouse Hippocampal Interneuron Diversity
Tricoire, L., Pelkey, K. A., Erkkila, B. E., Jeffries, B. W., Yuan, X., & McBain, C. J. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0323-11.2011 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Lien, C., & Jónás, P. (2003) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-06-02058.2003 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Gating of hippocampal activity, plasticity, and memory by entorhinal cortex long-range inhibition
Basu, J., Zaremba, J. D., Cheung, S. K., Hitti, F. L., Zemelman, B. V., Losonczy, A., & Siegelbaum, S. A. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa5694 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Siegle, J. H., & Wilson, M. A. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.03061 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Pawelzik, H., Hughes, D. I., & Thomson, A. M. (2002) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.10118 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Behavior-dependent specialization of identified hippocampal interneurons
Lapray, D., Lasztóczi, B., Lagler, M., Viney, T. J., Katona, L., Valenti, O., Hartwich, K., Borhegyi, Z., Somogyi, P., & Klausberger, T. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3176 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Santhakumar, V., Aradi, I., & Soltesz, I. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00777.2004 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Neurogliaform Neurons Form a Novel Inhibitory Network in the Hippocampal CA1 Area
Price, C. J., Cauli, B., Kovacs, E. R., Kulik, A., Lambolez, B., Shigemoto, R., & Capogna, M. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1135-05.2005 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Fuentealba, P., Begum, R., Capogna, M., Jinno, S., Márton, L. F., Csicsvari, J., Thomson, A., Somogyi, P., & Klausberger, T. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.034 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Varga, C., Golshani, P., & Soltesz, I. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1210929109 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Parvalbumin interneurons of hippocampus tune population activity at theta frequency
Amilhon, B., Huh, C. Y. L., Manseau, F., Ducharme, G., Nichol, H., Adamantidis, A., & Williams, S. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.027 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Deuchars, J., & Thomson, A. M. (1996) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(96)00251-5 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen, J., Santhakumar, V., Morgan, R. J., Huerta, R., Tsimring, L., & Soltesz, I. (2007) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00950.2006 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Blasco‐Ibáñez, J. M., & Freund, T. F. (1995) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb00638.x · Cited by 212 · see citing works
The Spiking Component of Oscillatory Extracellular Potentials in the Rat Hippocampus
Schomburg, E. W., Anastassiou, C. A., Buzsáki, G., & Koch, C. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0656-12.2012 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
neuroConstruct: A Tool for Modeling Networks of Neurons in 3D Space
Gleeson, P., Steuber, V., & Silver, R. A. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.03.025 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Outward currents of single hippocampal cells obtained from the adult guinea‐pig.
Numann, R. E., Wadman, W. J., & Wong, R. K. S. (1987) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016826 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Parallel network simulations with NEURON
Migliore, M., Cannia, C., Lytton, W. W., Markram, H., & Hines, M. L. (2006) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10827-006-7949-5 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Cobb, S. R., Halasy, K., Vida, I., Nyı́ri, G., Tamás, G., Buhl, E. H., & Somogyi, P. (1997) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00055-9 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Calcium activates two types of potassium channels in rat hippocampal neurons in culture
Lancaster, B., Nicoll, R. A., & Perkel, D. J. (1991) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.11-01-00023.1991 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Metz, A. E. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0624-05.2005 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Gulyás, A. I., Tóth, K., Dános, P., & Freund, T. F. (1991) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903120305 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Encoding and retrieval in a model of the hippocampal CA1 microcircuit
Vassilis Cutsuridis, A., Cobb, S., & Graham, B. P. (2009) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20661 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Rotstein, H. G., Pervouchine, D. D., Acker, C. D., Gillies, M. J., White, J. A., Buhl, E. H., Whittington, M. A., & Kopell, N. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00957.2004 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Szabadics, J., Tamás, G., & Soltesz, I. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707204104 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Katona, L., Lapray, D., Viney, T. J., Oulhaj, A., Borhegyi, Z., Micklem, B. R., Klausberger, T., & Somogyi, P. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.007 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Computer simulations of morphologically reconstructed CA3 hippocampal neurons
Migliore, M., Cook, E. P., Jaffe, D. B., Turner, D. A., & Johnston, D. (1995) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1995.73.3.1157 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Klee, R., Ficker, E. K., & Heinemann, U. (1995) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1995.74.5.1982 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
The neocortical microcircuit collaboration portal: a resource for rat somatosensory cortex
Ramaswamy, S., Courcol, J.-D., Abdellah, M., Adaszewski, S. R., Antille, N., Arsever, S., Atenekeng, G., Bilgili, A., Brukau, Y., Chalimourda, A., et al. (2015) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2015.00044 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Hippocampome.org: a knowledge base of neuron types in the rodent hippocampus
Wheeler, D. W., White, C. M., Rees, C. L., Komendantov, A. O., Hamilton, D. J., & Ascoli, G. A. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.09960 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Campanac, E., Gasselin, C., Baude, A., Rama, S., Ankri, N., & Debanne, D. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.020 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Dannenberg, H., Pabst, M., Braganza, O., Schoch, S., Niediek, J., Bayraktar, M., Mormann, F., & Beck, H. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4460-14.2015 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Atherton, J. F., & Bevan, M. D. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1475-05.2005 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Ketamine Disrupts Theta Modulation of Gamma in a Computer Model of Hippocampus
Neymotin, S. A., Lazarewicz, M. T., Sherif, M., Contreras, D., Finkel, L. H., & Lytton, W. W. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0501-11.2011 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Hippocampal CA1 spiking during encoding and retrieval: Relation to theta phase
Manns, J. R., Zilli, E. A., Ong, K. C., Hasselmo, M. E., & Eichenbaum, H. (2006) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2006.05.007 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Ferraguti, F., Klausberger, T., Cobden, P., Baude, A., Roberts, J. D. B., Szucs, P., Kinoshita, A., Shigemoto, R., Somogyi, P., & Dalezios, Y. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2547-05.2005 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Basket cell dichotomy in microcircuit function
Armstrong, C., & Soltész, I. (2011) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.223669 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Slow and fast transient potassium currents in cultured rat hippocampal cells.
Ficker, E. K., & Heinemann, U. (1992) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp018932 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Hájos, N., & Mody, I. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-21-08427.1997 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Functional fission of parvalbumin interneuron classes during fast network events
Varga, C., Oijala, M., Lish, J., Szabo, G. G., Bezaire, M., Marchionni, I., Golshani, P., & Soltesz, I. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.04006 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationJaffe, D. B., Ross, W. N., Lisman, J. E., Lasser‐Ross, N., Miyakawa, H., & Johnston, D. (1994) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1994.71.3.1065 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Coherent phasic excitation during hippocampal ripples
Maier, N., Tejero-Cantero, Á., Dorrn, A. L., Winterer, J., Beed, P. S., Morris, G., Kempter, R., Poulet, J. F. A., Leibold, C., & Schmitz, D. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.016 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Increased Dentate Gyrus Excitability in Neuroligin-2-Deficient Mice in Vivo
Jedlička, P., Hoon, M., Papadopoulos, T. G., Vlachos, A., Winkels, R., Poulopoulos, A., Betz, H., Deller, T., Brose, N., Varoqueaux, F., et al. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq100 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
The Roles of GABAB Receptors in Cortical Network Activity
Kohl, M. M., & Paulsen, O. (2010) · Advances in pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s1054-3589(10)58009-8 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Saraga, F., Wu, C. P., Zhang, L., & Skinner, F. K. (2003) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2003.046177 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Lee, S.-H., Foldy, C., & Soltesz, I. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6238-09.2010 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Fuentealba, P., Klausberger, T., Karayannis, T., Suen, W. Y., Huck, J., Tomioka, R., Rockland, K., Capogna, M., Studer, M., Morales, M., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4199-09.2010 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
GABAB Receptor Modulation of Feedforward Inhibition through Hippocampal Neurogliaform Cells
Price, C. J., Scott, R., Rusakov, D. A., & Capogna, M. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4673-07.2008 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
NeuroElectro: a window to the world's neuron electrophysiology data
Tripathy, S. J., Savitskaya, J., Burton, S. D., Urban, N. N., & Gerkin, R. C. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2014.00040 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Diverse Phase Relations among Neuronal Rhythms and Their Potential Function
Maris, E., Fries, P., & van Ede, F. (2016) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2015.12.004 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Applications of the spike density function in analysis of neuronal firing patterns
Szűcs, A. L. (1998) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/s0165-0270(98)00033-8 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Diversity in the Neuronal Machine: Order and Variability in Interneuronal Microcircuits
Soltesz, I. (2005) · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationTheta phase precession of grid and place cell firing in open environments
Jeewajee, A., Barry, C., Douchamps, V., Manson, D., Lever, C., & Burgess, N. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0532 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Akam, T. E., & Kullmann, D. M. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002760 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Aradi, I., & Holmes, W. R. (1999) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1023/a:1008801821784 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Capogna, M. (2011) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2010.201004 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Molecular neurobiology; a practical approach
(1992) · International Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0020-711x(92)90192-4 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Karayannis, T., Elfant, D., Huerta-Ocampo, I., Teki, S., Scott, R. S., Rusakov, D. A., Jones, M. V., & Capogna, M. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5883-09.2010 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Mátyás, F., Freund, T. F., & Gulyás, A. I. (2004) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03225.x · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Cutsuridis, V., & Hasselmo, M. E. (2012) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.21002 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Elfant, D., Pál, B. Z., Emptage, N., & Capogna, M. (2008) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.06001.x · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Fully implicit parallel simulation of single neurons
Hines, M. L., Markram, H., & Schürmann, F. (2008) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10827-008-0087-5 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Ivy and Neurogliaform Interneurons Are a Major Target of μ-Opioid Receptor Modulation
Krook-Magnuson, E., Luu, L., Lee, S.-H., Varga, C., & Soltesz, I. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2269-11.2011 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Emergence of Physiological Oscillation Frequencies in a Computer Model of Neocortex
Neymotin, S. A., Lee, H., Park, E. H., Fenton, A. A., & Lytton, W. W. (2011) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2011.00019 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Diversity in the Neuronal Machine
Soltesz, I. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195177015.001.1 · Cited by 68 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We included eight model interneuron types (Klausberger and Somogyi, 2008; Soltesz, 2006; Armstrong and Soltesz, 2012): PV+ basket cells (these fast-spiking cells synapse on the somata and proximal dendrites of CA1 pyramidal cells), cholecystokinin+ (CCK+) basket cells (these regular-spiking cells…”
BackgroundMethodTranslating network models to parallel hardware in NEURON
Hines, M. L., & Carnevale, N. T. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.09.010 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Butler, J. L., Mendonça, P. R. F., Robinson, H. P. C., & Paulsen, O. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3150-15.2016 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Craig, M. T., & McBain, C. (2013) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2013.10.002 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Ferguson, K., Huh, C. Y. L., Amilhon, B., Williams, S., & Skinner, F. K. (2013) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2013.00144 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Reconstruction of hippocampal granule cell electrophysiology by computer simulation
Yuen, G., & Durand, D. M. (1991) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(91)90337-n · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Spike Resonance Properties in Hippocampal O-LM Cells Are Dependent on Refractory Dynamics
Kispersky, T. J., Fernandez, F. R., Economo, M. N., & White, J. A. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1361-11.2012 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Prediction by Modeling That Epilepsy May Be Caused by Very Small Functional Changes in Ion Channels
Thomas, E. A., Reid, C. A., Berkovic, S. F., & Petrou, S. (2009) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.219 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Hines, M. L., Eichner, H., & Schürmann, F. (2008) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10827-007-0073-3 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Local circuitry involving parvalbumin‐positive basket cells in the CA2 region of the hippocampus
Mercer, A., Eastlake, K., Trigg, H. L., & Thomson, A. M. (2010) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20841 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Psychostimulant-Induced Plasticity of Intrinsic Neuronal Excitability in Ventral Subiculum
Cooper, D., Moore, S. J., Staff, N. P., & Spruston, N. (2003) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-30-09937.2003 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Potassium currents in acutely isolated human hippocampal dentate granule cells.
Beck, H., Clusmann, H., Kral, T., Schramm, J., Heinemann, U., & Elger, C. E. (1997) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp021842 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Modelling the non-linear conductances of excitable membranes
Borg-Graham, L. J. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199631063.003.0013 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Taxidis, J., Mizuseki, K., Mason, R., & Owen, M. (2013) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2013.00003 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Computational modeling of GABAA receptor-mediated paired-pulse inhibition in the dentate gyrus
Jedlička, P., Deller, T., & Schwarzacher, S. W. (2010) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10827-010-0214-y · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Quattrocolo, G., & Maccaferri, G. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5680-12.2013 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Ferguson, K. A., Huh, C. Y. L., Amilhon, B., Manseau, F., Williams, S., & Skinner, F. K. (2015) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00110 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Papp, O. I., Karlócai, M. R., Tóth, I. E., Freund, T. F., & Hájos, N. (2013) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22147 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Reduced excitability in the dentate gyrus network of βIV‐spectrin mutant mice in vivo
Winkels, R., Jedlička, P., Weise, F. K., Schultz, C., Deller, T., & Schwarzacher, S. W. (2009) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20549 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Saudargienė, A., Cobb, S., & Graham, B. P. (2014) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22365 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Linking Macroscopic with Microscopic Neuroanatomy Using Synthetic Neuronal Populations
Schneider, C. J., Cuntz, H., & Soltész, I. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003921 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Mossy fiber sprouting interacts with sodium channel mutations to increase dentate gyrus excitability
Thomas, E. A., Reid, C. A., & Petrou, S. (2009) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02202.x · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Tejada, J., & Roque, A. C. (2014) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.02.007 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Hendrickson, P. J., Yu, G. J., Song, D., & Berger, T. W. (2015) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00155 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Topological organization of <scp>CA</scp>3‐to‐<scp>CA</scp>1 excitation
Hongo, Y., Ogawa, K., Takahara, Y., Takasu, K., Royer, S., Hasegawa, M., Sakaguchi, G., & Ikegaya, Y. (2015) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.12969 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Evidence of multistability in a realistic computer simulation of hippocampus subfield CA1
Siekmeier, P. J. (2009) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.01.021 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Bezaire, M. J., Raikov, I., Burk, K. C., Armstrong, C., & Soltész, I. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/081927 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationKrook-Magnuson, E., Soltesz, I., & Lee, S.-H. (2016) · OSF · doi:10.17605/osf.io/m5edm · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Bezaire, M. J., Raikov, I., Burk, K. C., Vyas, D., & Soltész, I. (2014) · UC Berkeley · doi:10.6080/k05h7d60 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationBezaire, M. J. (2015) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationSimulation results from a network model of the isolated hippocampal CA1 subfield in ratPreprint
Soltész, I., Vyas, D., Bezaire, M. J., Burk, K. C., & Raikov, I. (2016) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.17605/osf.io/v4ceh · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationFiring pattern of O-LM cells in mouse hippocampal CA1Preprint
Maccaferri, G., & Quattrocolo, G. (2016) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.17605/osf.io/ra8mw · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Illuminating dendritic function with computational models
Poirazi, P., & Papoutsi, A. (2020) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-020-0301-7 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Inhibitory Interneurons Regulate Temporal Precision and Correlations in Cortical Circuits
Cardin, J. A. (2018) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2018.07.015 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Turi, G. F., Li, W.-K., Chavlis, S., Pandi, I., O’Hare, J., Priestley, J. B., Grosmark, A. D., Liao, Z., Ladow, M., Zhang, J. F., et al. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.009 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Breakdown of spatial coding and interneuron synchronization in epileptic mice
Shuman, T., Aharoni, D. B., Cai, D. J., Lee, C. R., Chavlis, S., Page-Harley, L., Vetere, L. M., Feng, Y., Yang, C. Y., Mollinedo-Gajate, I., et al. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0559-0 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
The Neurodata Without Borders ecosystem for neurophysiological data science
Rübel, O., Tritt, A., Ly, R., Dichter, B., Ghosh, S., Niu, L., Baker, P. M., Soltész, I., Ng, L., Svoboda, K., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.78362 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
NetPyNE, a tool for data-driven multiscale modeling of brain circuits
Dura-Bernal, S., Suter, B. A., Gleeson, P., Cantarelli, M., Quintana, A., Rodriguez, F., Kedziora, D. J., Chadderdon, G. L., Kerr, C. C., Neymotin, S. A., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.44494 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
The role of inhibitory circuits in hippocampal memory processing
Topolnik, L., & Tamboli, S. (2022) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-022-00599-0 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Schulz, J. M., Knoflach, F., Hernandez, M., & Bischofberger, J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06004-8 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Visualization of currents in neural models with similar behavior and different conductance densities
Alonso, L. M., & Marder, E. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.42722 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Challenging the point neuron dogma: FS basket cells as 2-stage nonlinear integrators
Tzilivaki, A., Kastellakis, G., & Poirazi, P. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11537-7 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Gleeson, P., Cantarelli, M., Marin, B., Quintana, A., Earnshaw, M., Sadeh, S., Piasini, E., Birgiolas, J., Cannon, R. C., Cayco-Gajic, N. A., et al. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.019 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Navas-Olivé, A., Valero, M., Jurado-Parras, T., de Salas-Quiroga, A., Averkin, R. G., Gambino, G., Cid, E., & de la Prida, L. M. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15840-6 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Brain Modeling ToolKit: An open source software suite for multiscale modeling of brain circuits
Dai, K., Gratiy, S. L., Billeh, Y. N., Xu, R., Cai, B., Cain, N., Rimehaug, A. E., Stasik, A. J., Einevoll, G. T., Mihalaş, Ş., et al. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008386 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Degeneracy in epilepsy: multiple routes to hyperexcitable brain circuits and their repair
Stöber, T. M., Batulin, D., Triesch, J., Narayanan, R., & Jedlička, P. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04823-0 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Nicola, W., & Claudia Clopath, A. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0415-2 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Chittajallu, R., Wester, J. C., Craig, M. T., Barksdale, E., Yuan, X. Q., Akgül, G., Fang, C., Collins, D., Hunt, S., Pelkey, K. A., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00218-y · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Data‐driven integration of hippocampal CA1 synaptic physiology in silico
Ecker, A., Romani, A., Sáray, S., Káli, S., Migliore, M., Falck, J. E., Lange, S., Mercer, A., Thomson, A. M., Muller, E. B., et al. (2020) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.23220 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Resolving the Micro-Macro Disconnect to Address Core Features of Seizure Networks
Farrell, J. S., Nguyen, Q.-A., & Soltész, I. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.043 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
BioNet: A Python interface to NEURON for modeling large-scale networks
Gratiy, S. L., Billeh, Y. N., Dai, K., Mitelut, C., Feng, D. H., Gouwens, N. W., Cain, N., Koch, C., Anastassiou, C. A., & Arkhipov, A. S. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201630 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Solving brain circuit function and dysfunction with computational modeling and optogenetic fMRI
Lee, J. H., Liu, Q., & Dadgar‐Kiani, E. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abq3868 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Quantitative firing pattern phenotyping of hippocampal neuron types
Komendantov, A. O., Venkadesh, S., Rees, C. L., Wheeler, D. W., Hamilton, D. J., & Ascoli, G. A. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-52611-w · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Liu, Z., Han, F., & Wang, Q. (2022) · Nonlinear Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s11071-022-07298-6 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Inhibition shapes the organization of hippocampal representations
McKenzie, S. (2017) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22803 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Bilash, O. M., Chavlis, S., Johnson, C. D., Poirazi, P., & Basu, J. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111962 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Mehak, S. F., Shivakumar, A. B., Kumari, S., Muralidharan, B., & Gangadharan, G. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104628 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Active Dendrites and Local Field Potentials: Biophysical Mechanisms and Computational Explorations
Sinha, M., & Narayanan, R. (2021) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.08.035 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Feng, F., Headley, D. B., Amir, A., Kanta, V., Chen, Z., Paré, D., & Nair, S. S. (2019) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0388-18.2018 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Attili, S. M., Silva, M. F. M., Nguyen, T.-V., & Ascoli, G. A. (2019) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-019-01940-7 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Parallel odor processing by mitral and middle tufted cells in the olfactory bulb
Cavarretta, F., Burton, S. D., Igarashi, K. M., Shepherd, G. M., Hines, M. L., & Migliore, M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-25740-x · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Novel long-range inhibitory nNOS-expressing hippocampal cells
Wick, Z. C., Tetzlaff, M. R., & Krook-Magnuson, E. I. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.46816 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Inhibitory conductance controls place field dynamics in the hippocampus
Valero, M., Navas-Olivé, A., de la Prida, L. M., & Buzsáki, G. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111232 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Romani, A., Antonietti, A., Bella, D., Budd, J., Giacalone, E., Kurban, K., Sáray, S., Abdellah, M., Arnaudon, A., Boci, E., et al. (2024) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002861 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Venkadesh, S., Komendantov, A. O., Wheeler, D. W., Hamilton, D. J., & Ascoli, G. A. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007462 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Kang, Y., Clement, E. M., Park, I., Greenfield, L. J., Smith, B. N., & Lee, S.-H. (2021) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2021.113724 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Full-scale scaffold model of the human hippocampus CA1 area
Gandolfi, D., Mapelli, J., Solinas, S. M. G., Triebkorn, P., D'Angelo, E. U., Jirsa, V., & Migliore, M. (2023) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-023-00417-2 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Hernández‐Frausto, M., Bilash, O. M., Masurkar, A. V., & Basu, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2023.1223891 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Durá-Bernal, S., Griffith, E. Y., Barczak, A., O’Connell, M. N., McGinnis, T., Moreira, J. V. S., Schroeder, C. E., Lytton, W. W., Lakatos, P., & Neymotin, S. A. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113378 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Chatzikalymniou, A. P., & Skinner, F. K. (2018) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0146-18.2018 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Integrative Models of Brain Structure and Dynamics: Concepts, Challenges, and Methods
Venkadesh, S., & Horn, J. D. V. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.752332 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Single Bursts of Individual Granule Cells Functionally Rearrange Feedforward Inhibition
Neubrandt, M., Oláh, V. J., Brunner, J., Marosi, E. L., Soltész, I., & Szabadics, J. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1595-17.2018 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Sáray, S., Rössert, C., Appukuttan, S., Migliore, R., Vitale, P., Lupaşcu, C. A., Bologna, L. L., Geit, W. A. H. V., Romani, A., Davison, A. P., et al. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008114 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Ferguson, K., Chatzikalymniou, A. P., & Skinner, F. K. (2017) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0131-17.2017 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Wal, M. T., & Tiesinga, P. H. E. (2021) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-021-00894-6 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
From mechanisms to functions: The role of theta and gamma coherence in the intrahippocampal circuits
Mysin, I. E., & Shubina, L. (2022) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.23410 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Theta-gamma phase amplitude coupling in a hippocampal CA1 microcircuit
Ponzi, A. P. D., Durá-Bernal, S., & Migliore, M. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010942 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
A comprehensive knowledge base of synaptic electrophysiology in the rodent hippocampal formation
Moradi, K., & Ascoli, G. A. (2019) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.23148 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Mysin, I. E., Kitchigina, V. F., & Kazanovich, Y. B. (2019) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2019.04.004 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Kopsick, J. D., Tecuatl, C., Moradi, K., Attili, S. M., Kashyap, H. J., Xing, J., Chen, K., Krichmar, J. L., & Ascoli, G. A. (2022) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-021-09954-2 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Offline memory replay in recurrent neuronal networks emerges from constraints on online dynamics
Milstein, A. D., Tran, S., Ng, G. Y., & Soltész, I. (2022) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp283216 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
On the structural connectivity of large-scale models of brain networks at cellular level
Giacopelli, G., Tegolo, D., Spera, E., & Migliore, M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83759-z · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Large-scale biophysically detailed model of somatosensory thalamocortical circuits in NetPyNE
Borges, F. S., Moreira, J. V. S., Takarabe, L. M., Lytton, W. W., & Durá-Bernal, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2022.884245 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Integrating multimodal data to understand cortical circuit architecture and function
Arkhipov, A. S., da Costa, N. M., de Vries, S. E. J., Bakken, T. E., Bennett, C., Bernard, A., Berg, J., Buice, M. A., Collman, F., Daigle, T. L., et al. (2025) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-025-01904-7 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Attili, S. M., Moradi, K., Wheeler, D. W., & Ascoli, G. A. (2022) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.15639 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Data-driven multiscale computational models of cortical and subcortical regions
Ramaswamy, S. (2024) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2024.102842 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Multi-scale spiking network model of human cerebral cortex
Pronold, J., van Meegen, A., Shimoura, R. O., Vollenbröker, H., Senden, M., Hilgetag, C. C., Bakker, R., & van Albada, S. J. (2024) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae409 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Estimation of neural network model parameters from local field potentials (LFPs)
Skaar, J.-E. W., Stasik, A., Hagen, E., Ness, T. V., & Einevoll, G. T. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007725 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
NeuroML-DB: Sharing and characterizing data-driven neuroscience models described in NeuroML
Birgiolas, J., Haynes, V., Gleeson, P., Gerkin, R. C., Dietrich, S. W., & Crook, S. M. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010941 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Quantitative simulation of extracellular single unit recording from the surface of cortex
Hill, M., Rios, E., Sudhakar, S., Roossien, D. H., Caldwell, C. M., Cai, D., Ahmed, O. J., Lempka, S. F., & Chestek, C. A. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aacdb8 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Learning, Fast and Slow: Single- and Many-Shot Learning in the Hippocampus
Liao, Z., & Losonczy, A. (2024) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-102423-100258 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Reconstruction of the Hippocampus
Romani, A., Schürmann, F., Markram, H., & Migliore, M. (2022) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89439-9_11 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Cell Type-specific Intrinsic Perithreshold Oscillations in Hippocampal GABAergic Interneurons
Kang, Y., Lewis, H. E. S., Young, M. W., Govindaiah, G., Greenfield, L. J., García‐Rill, E., & Lee, S.-H. (2018) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.02.014 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Ultrafast simulation of large-scale neocortical microcircuitry with biophysically realistic neurons
Oláh, V. J., Pedersen, N. P., & Rowan, M. J. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.79535 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Zhou, H., Zhu, J., Jia, J., Xiang, W., Peng, H., Zhang, Y., Liu, B., Mu, Y., & Lu, Y. (2022) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2022.100492 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Noguchi, A., Yamashiro, K., Matsumoto, N., & Ikegaya, Y. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04719-z · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Network instability dynamics drive a transient bursting period in the developing hippocampus in vivo
Graf, J., Rahmati, V., Majoros, M., Witte, O. W., Geis, C., Kiebel, S. J., Holthoff, K., & Kirmse, K. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.82756 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Schumm, S. N., Gabrieli, D. J., & Meaney, D. F. (2022) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.23402 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Durá-Bernal, S., Griffith, E. Y., Barczak, A., O’Connell, M. N., McGinnis, T., Schroeder, C. E., Lytton, W. W., Lakatos, P., & Neymotin, S. A. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.03.479036 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Linaro, D., Levy, M. J., & Hunt, D. L. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010071 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Functional specification of CCK+ interneurons by alternative isoforms of Kv4.3 auxiliary subunits
Oláh, V. J., Lukacsovich, D., Winterer, J., Arszovszki, A., Lőrincz, A., Nusser, Z., Földy, C., & Szabadics, J. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.58515 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Tsolias, A., & Medalla, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2021.795325 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
The potential role of the cholecystokinin system in declarative memory
Lau, S. H., Young, C. H., Zheng, Y., & Chen, X. (2022) · Neurochemistry International · doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2022.105440 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Adaikkan, C., Joseph, J., Foustoukos, G., Wang, J., Polygalov, D., Boehringer, R., Middleton, S. J., Huang, A. J. Y., Tsai, L., & McHugh, T. J. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46478-3 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Inhibitory plasticity supports replay generalization in the hippocampus
Liao, Z., Terada, S., Raikov, I., Hadjiabadi, D. H., Szoboszlay, M., Soltész, I., & Losonczy, A. (2024) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01745-w · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationDo Process-1 simulations generate the epistemic feelings that drive Process-2 decision making?
Fields, C., & Glazebrook, J. F. (2020) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-020-00981-9 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Braun, W., & Memmesheimer, R.-M. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009891 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Chatzikalymniou, A. P., Gumus, M., Lunyov, A. R., Rich, S., Lefebvre, J., & Skinner, F. K. (2021) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.23364 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Wheeler, D. W., Kopsick, J. D., Sutton, N. M., Tecuatl, C., Komendantov, A. O., Nadella, K., & Ascoli, G. A. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.90597 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Földi, T., Lörincz, M. L., & Berényi, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2021.784085 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Gandolfi, D., Mapelli, J., Solinas, S. M. G., Schepper, R. D., Geminiani, A., Casellato, C., D'Angelo, E. U., & Migliore, M. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18024-y · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Multinode implementation of an extended Hodgkin–Huxley simulator
Chatzikonstantis, G., Sidiropoulos, H., Strydis, C., Negrello, M., Smaragdos, G., Zeeuw, C. I. D., & Soudris, D. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.10.062 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Sendi, M. S. E., Inman, C. S., Bijanki, K. R., Blanpain, L. T., Park, J. K., Hamann, S. B., Gross, R. E., Willie, J. T., & Mahmoudi, B. (2021) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2021.09.009 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Theta-phase locking of single neurons during human spatial memory
Guth, T. A., Brandt, A., Reinacher, P. C., Schulze‐Bonhage, A., Jacobs, J., & Kunz, L. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62553-9 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Computational models of memory consolidation and long-term synaptic plasticity during sleep
Rennó‐Costa, C., da Silva, A. C. C., Blanco, W., & Ribeiro, S. T. G. (2018) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2018.10.003 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Sutton, N. M., & Ascoli, G. A. (2021) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2021.07.008 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Medalla, M., Chang, W., Ibañez, S., Guillamón-Vivancos, T., Nittmann, M., Kapitonava, A., Busch, S. E., Moore, T. L., Rosene, D. L., & Luebke, J. I. (2021) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhab347 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Vardalakis, N., Aussel, A., Rougier, N. P., & Wagner, F. B. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.87356 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Sutton, N. M., Gutiérrez-Guzmán, B. E., Dannenberg, H., & Ascoli, G. A. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25116059 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Wei, X., Campagna, J. J., Jagodzinska, B. M., Wi, D., Cohn, W., Lee, J. T., Zhu, C., Huang, C., Molnár, L., Houser, C. R., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2400420121 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Osanai, H., Nair, I. R., & 北村, 貴. (2023) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.15850 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Hasselmo, M. E., Alexander, A. S., Hoyland, A., Robinson, J. C., Bezaire, M. J., Chapman, G. W., Saudargienė, A., Carstensen, L. C., & Dannenberg, H. (2020) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.03.048 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationHypothalamic regulation of hippocampal CA1 interneurons by the supramammillary nucleus
Jiang, Y., Lee, D. K., Guo, W., Li, M., & Sun, Q. (2024) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114898 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Dainauskas, J. J., Marie, H., Migliore, M., & Saudargienė, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsyn.2023.1113957 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The critical role of persistent sodium current in hippocampal gamma oscillations
Kang, Y., Clement, E. M., Sumsky, S. L., Xiang, Y., Park, I., Santaniello, S., Greenfield, L. J., García‐Rill, E., Smith, B. N., & Lee, S.-H. (2019) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.107787 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Ozsvár, A., Komlósi, G., Oláh, G., Baka, J., Molnár, G., & Tamás, G. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.65634 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Guet-McCreight, A., & Skinner, F. K. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0209429 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Regulation of gamma‐frequency oscillation by feedforward inhibition: A computational modeling study
Rennó‐Costa, C., Teixeira, D. G., & Soltész, I. (2019) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.23093 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The SONATA Data Format for Efficient Description of Large-Scale Network ModelsPreprint
Dai, K., Hernando, J., Billeh, Y. N., Gratiy, S. L., Planas, J., Davison, A. P., Durá-Bernal, S., Gleeson, P., Devresse, A., Dichter, B., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/625491 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Spiral wave dynamics in a neuronal network model
Souza, D. L. M., Borges, F. S., Gabrick, E. C., Bentivoglio, L. E., Protachevicz, P. R., dos Santos, V., Viana, R. L., Caldas, I. L., Iarosz, K. C., Batista, A. M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Physics Complexity · doi:10.1088/2632-072x/ad42f6 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Hippocampal interneuronal dysfunction and hyperexcitability in a porcine model of concussion
Ulyanova, A. V., Adam, C. D., Cottone, C., Maheshwari, N., Grovola, M. R., Fruchet, O., Alamar, J., Koch, P., Johnson, V., Cullen, D. K., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05491-w · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Memory Prosthesis: Is It Time for a Deep Neuromimetic Computing Approach?
Vassilis Cutsuridis, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00667 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bezaire, M. J., Raikov, I., Burk, K., Vyas, D., & Soltesz, I.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
- Published
- 2016-12-23
- Volume
- 5
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5313080
- OpenAlex
- W2561068888
- Semantic Scholar
- bf83b20cd9cedc55b96997bba3dd31b6cb9f1231
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 160
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (F32NS090753, NS35915, NS090583)
- National Science Foundation (DGE-0808392, XSEDE Allocations - TG-IBN140007, XSEDE Allocations - TG-IBN130022, XSEDE Allocations - TG-IBN100011, IOS-1310378)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- hippocampal theta rhythm, interneurons, parvalbumin interneurons, neurogliaform cells, gamma oscillations, phase locking, computational neuroscience, spontaneous oscillations
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Interneurons, Neuroglia, Theta Rhythm, Neural Networks, Computer, Mice, Rats, CA1 Region, Hippocampal, Spatio-Temporal Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review