The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MENε/β noncoding RNAs are essential for structural integrity of nuclear paraspeckles
Open accessAbstract
Recent transcriptome analyses have shown that thousands of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) are transcribed from mammalian genomes. Although the number of functionally annotated ncRNAs is still limited, they are known to be frequently retained in the nucleus, where they coordinate regulatory networks of gene expression. Some subnuclear organelles or nuclear bodies include RNA species whose identity and structural roles are largely unknown. We identified 2 abundant overlapping ncRNAs, MENε and MENβ (MENε/β), which are transcribed from the corresponding site in the multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) I locus and which localize to nuclear paraspeckles. This finding raises the intriguing possibility that MENε/β are involved in paraspeckle organization, because paraspeckles are, reportedly, RNase-sensitive structures. Successful removal of MENε/β by a refined knockdown method resulted in paraspeckle disintegration. Furthermore, the reassembly of paraspeckles disassembled by transcriptional arrest appeared to be unsuccessful in the absence of MENε/β. RNA interference and immunoprecipitation further revealed that the paraspeckle proteins p54/nrb and PSF selectively associate with and stabilize the longer MENβ, thereby contributing to the organization of the paraspeckle structure. The paraspeckle protein PSP1 is not directly involved in either MENε/β stabilization or paraspeckle organization. We postulate a model for nuclear paraspeckle body organization where specific ncRNAs and RNA-binding proteins cooperate to maintain and, presumably, establish the structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05874 · Cited by 5,223
Lécuyer, E., Yoshida, H., Parthasarathy, N., Alm, C., Babak, T., Cerovina, T., Hughes, T. R., Tomancak, P., & Krause, H. M. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.003 · Cited by 967
Cited by
Gene regulation by long non-coding RNAs and its biological functions
Statello, L., Guo, C.-J., Chen, L.-L., & Huarte, M. (2021) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00315-9 · Cited by 4,991
Long Noncoding RNAs: Cellular Address Codes in Development and Disease
Batista, P. J., & Chang, H. Y. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.012 · Cited by 2,531
The Noncoding RNA Revolution—Trashing Old Rules to Forge New Ones
Cech, T. R., & Steitz, J. A. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.008 · Cited by 2,524
Long noncoding RNAs: past, present, and future
Kung, J. T. Y., Colognori, D., & Lee, J. T. (2013) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.112.146704 · Cited by 1,874
LNCcation: lncRNA localization and function
Bridges, M. C., Daulagala, A. C., & Kourtidis, A. (2021) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.202009045 · Cited by 1,556
The tumour hypoxia induced non-coding transcriptome
Choudhry, H., Harris, A. L., & McIntyre, A. (2016) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2016.01.003 · Cited by 120
From “Cellular” RNA to “Smart” RNA: Multiple Roles of RNA in Genome Stability and Beyond
Michelini, F., Jalihal, A. P., Francia, S., Meers, C., Neeb, Z. T., Rossiello, F., Gioia, U., Aguado, J., Jones-Weinert, C., Luke, B., et al. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00487 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Sasaki, Y. T. F., Ideue, T., Sano, M., Mituyama, T., & Hirose, T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-02-24
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2525-2530
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2091204895
- Cited by
- 604
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.