Cited by 1,385Health disparities and outcomesAging and Gerontology ResearchHealth, psychology, and well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Allostatic load as a marker of cumulative biological risk: MacArthur studies of successful aging

Open access
Seeman, Teresa E., McEwen, Bruce S., Rowe, John W., Singer, Burton H.·2001·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Allostatic load (AL) has been proposed as a new conceptualization of cumulative biological burden exacted on the body through attempts to adapt to life's demands. Using a multisystem summary measure of AL, we evaluated its capacity to predict four categories of health outcomes, 7 years after a baseline survey of 1,189 men and women age 70–79. Higher baseline AL scores were associated with significantly increased risk for 7-year mortality as well as declines in cognitive and physical functioning and were marginally associated with incident cardiovascular disease events, independent of standard socio-demographic characteristics and baseline health status. The summary AL measure was based on 10 parameters of biological functioning, four of which are primary mediators in the cascade from perceived challenges to downstream health outcomes. Six of the components are secondary mediators reflecting primarily components of the metabolic syndrome (syndrome X). AL was a better predictor of mortality and decline in physical functioning than either the syndrome X or primary mediator components alone. The findings support the concept of AL as a measure of cumulative biological burden.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.081072698

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. L Jaur, S Stoddard Chartbook on Women and Disability in the U.S. (U. S. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Washington, DC, 1999).
  2. T G Lohman, A F Roche, R Martorell Anthropometric Standardization (Human Kinetics Books, Champaign, IL, 1988).
  3. A M Krstulovic J Chromatogr 22, 1–34 (1983).
  4. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, Version 6. (1996).
  5. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08103.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Seeman, T. E., McEwen, B. S., Rowe, J. W., & Singer, B. H.
Affiliations
Aetna (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2001-04-03
Volume
98
Issue
8
Pages
4770-4775
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2015252215
Cited by
1,385
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 50
FWCI
30.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag017056-03)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG00586, AG 17056)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
allostatic load, successful aging, older adults, mortality, cognitive decline, cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, biological mediators, aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Regression Analysis, Stress, Physiological, Microvascular Angina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review