Cited by 110Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionGene Regulatory Network AnalysisBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Toolbox model of evolution of prokaryotic metabolic networks and their regulation

Open access
Maslov, Sergei, Krishna, Sandeep, Pang, Tin Yau, Sneppen, Kim·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

It has been reported that the number of transcription factors encoded in prokaryotic genomes scales approximately quadratically with their total number of genes. We propose a conceptual explanation of this finding and illustrate it using a simple model in which metabolic and regulatory networks of prokaryotes are shaped by horizontal gene transfer of coregulated metabolic pathways. Adapting to a new environmental condition monitored by a new transcription factor (e.g., learning to use another nutrient) involves both acquiring new enzymes and reusing some of the enzymes already encoded in the genome. As the repertoire of enzymes of an organism (its toolbox) grows larger, it can reuse its enzyme tools more often and thus needs to get fewer new ones to master each new task. From this observation, it logically follows that the number of functional tasks and their regulators increases faster than linearly with the total number of genes encoding enzymes. Genomes can also shrink, e.g., because of a loss of a nutrient from the environment, followed by deletion of its regulator and all enzymes that become redundant. We propose several simple models of network evolution elaborating on this toolbox argument and reproducing the empirically observed quadratic scaling. The distribution of lengths of pathway branches in our model agrees with that of the real-life metabolic network of Escherichia coli . Thus, our model provides a qualitative explanation for broad distributions of regulon sizes in prokaryotes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0903206106

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gene amplifications were identified to contribute to increased gene dosage and subsequently increased fitness.

    “In several recent studies, gene amplifications were identified to contribute to increased gene dosage [63,116,128] and subsequently increased fitness.”
  • In S. cerevisiae, adaptation towards salt tolerance led to increased cell size and increased ploidy; gene expression changes in CTT1 and MSN4 and a high-frequency SNP in the transcriptional regulator MOT2 were observed.

    “In the model yeast S. cerevisiae, adaptation towards salt tolerance led to increased cell size and increased ploidy. Additionally, gene expression changes in CTT1 and MSN4 were observed, as well as a high-frequency SNP in the transcriptional regulator MOT2[116].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]Anantharaman V, Koonin E, Aravind L (2001) Regulatory potential, phyletic distribution and evolution of ancient, intracellular small-molecule-binding domains. Journal of Molecular Biology 307(5): 1271-1292.

Authors
Maslov, S., Krishna, S., Pang, T. Y., & Sneppen, K.
Affiliations
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-06-16
Volume
106
Issue
24
Pages
9743-9748
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2046577147
Cited by
110
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
transcription factors, horizontal gene transfer, metabolic pathway evolution, gene expression regulation, genome size reduction, enzyme reusability, network evolution model
MeSH terms
Biological Evolution, Gene Expression Regulation, Models, Genetic, Prokaryotic Cells, Transcription, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review