Cited by 7Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionGene Regulatory Network AnalysisBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Resource constrained flux balance analysis predicts selective pressure on the global structure of metabolic networks

Open access
Abedpour, Nima, Kollmann, Markus·2015·BMC Systems Biology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A universal feature of metabolic networks is their hourglass or bow-tie structure on cellular level. This architecture reflects the conversion of multiple input nutrients into multiple biomass components via a small set of precursor metabolites. However, it is yet unclear to what extent this structural feature is the result of natural selection. RESULTS: We extend flux balance analysis to account for limited cellular resources. Using this model, optimal structure of metabolic networks can be calculated for different environmental conditions. We observe a significant structural reshaping of metabolic networks for a toy-network and E. coli core metabolism if we increase the share of invested resources for switching between different nutrient conditions. Here, hub nodes emerge and the optimal network structure becomes bow-tie-like as a consequence of limited cellular resource constraint. We confirm this theoretical finding by comparing the reconstructed metabolic networks of bacterial species with respect to their lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS: We show that bow-tie structure can give a system-level fitness advantage to organisms that live in highly competitive and fluctuating environments. Here, limitation of cellular resources can lead to an efficiency-flexibility tradeoff where it pays off for the organism to shorten catabolic pathways if they are frequently activated and deactivated. As a consequence, generalists that shuttle between diverse environmental conditions should have a more predominant bow-tie structure than specialists that visit just a few isomorphic habitats during their life cycle.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12918-015-0232-5

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Metabolic flexibility modeling can give insight into the evolution of metabolic pathways, demonstrating that genes encoding enzymes with high connectivity and high metabolic flux have a greater chance of conservation and are the most likely sites of metabolic regulation.

    “Finally, metabolic flexibility modeling can give us insight into the evolution of metabolic pathways (291), demonstrating that genes encoding enzymes with high connectivity and high metabolic flux have a greater chance of conservation (12) and are the most likely sites of metabolic regulation (292).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abedpour, N., & Kollmann, M.
Affiliations
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Abedpour, Nima
Venue
BMC Systems Biology
Published
2015-11-23
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
88-88
ISSN
1752-0509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2178186954
Cited by
7
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Systems Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF 853-2011)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC 1028, SPP 1395)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
metabolic network structure, bow-tie structure, natural selection, network hubs, environmental variability
MeSH terms
Escherichia coli, Models, Biological, Selection, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Metabolic Flux Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review