The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Symbolic gestures and spoken language are processed by a common neural system
Open accessAbstract
Symbolic gestures, such as pantomimes that signify actions (e.g., threading a needle) or emblems that facilitate social transactions (e.g., finger to lips indicating “be quiet”), play an important role in human communication. They are autonomous, can fully take the place of words, and function as complete utterances in their own right. The relationship between these gestures and spoken language remains unclear. We used functional MRI to investigate whether these two forms of communication are processed by the same system in the human brain. Responses to symbolic gestures, to their spoken glosses (expressing the gestures' meaning in English), and to visually and acoustically matched control stimuli were compared in a randomized block design. General Linear Models (GLM) contrasts identified shared and unique activations and functional connectivity analyses delineated regional interactions associated with each condition. Results support a model in which bilateral modality-specific areas in superior and inferior temporal cortices extract salient features from vocal-auditory and gestural-visual stimuli respectively. However, both classes of stimuli activate a common, left-lateralized network of inferior frontal and posterior temporal regions in which symbolic gestures and spoken words may be mapped onto common, corresponding conceptual representations. We suggest that these anterior and posterior perisylvian areas, identified since the mid-19th century as the core of the brain's language system, are not in fact committed to language processing, but may function as a modality-independent semiotic system that plays a broader role in human communication, linking meaning with symbols whether these are words, gestures, images, sounds, or objects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 · Cited by 7,770
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495
Maldjian, J. A., Laurienti, P. J., Kraft, R. A., & Burdette, J. H. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00169-1 · Cited by 5,085
Eco, U. (1976) · Indiana University Press eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2 · Cited by 2,899
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01260-0 · Cited by 2,858
The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components
Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001 · Cited by 2,144
Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation
Thompson-Schill, S. L., D’Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.26.14792 · Cited by 2,121
A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400
Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2532 · Cited by 1,700
The Representation of Object Concepts in the Brain
Martin, A. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143 · Cited by 1,591
Cited by
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12001495 · Cited by 1,569
Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans
Hickok, G. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21189 · Cited by 887
Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution
Stout, D., & Chaminade, T. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0099 · Cited by 329
Current trends in stroke rehabilitation. A review with focus on brain plasticity
Johansson, B. B. (2011) · Acta Neurologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01417.x · Cited by 282
Critical brain regions for action recognition: lesion symptom mapping in left hemisphere stroke
Kalénine, S., Buxbaum, L. J., & Coslett, H. B. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq210 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, J., Gannon, P. J., Emmorey, K., Smith, J. F., & Braun, A. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2009-12-08
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 20664-20669
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2020545859
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 7.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Symbolic gestures and spoken language are processed by a common neural system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0909197106
- The paper
- Xu, J., Gannon, P. J., Emmorey, K., Smith, J. F., & Braun, A. R. (2009). Symbolic gestures and spoken language are processed by a common neural system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909197106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.