Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Crosstalk between decidual NK and CD14 + myelomonocytic cells results in induction of Tregs and immunosuppression

Open access
Vacca, Paola, Cantoni, Claudia, Vitale, Massimo, Prato, Carola, Canegallo, Francesca, Fenoglio, Daniela, Ragni, Nicola, Moretta, Lorenzo, Mingari, Maria Cristina·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are thought to play a major role in pregnancy by inhibiting the maternal immune system and preventing fetal rejection. In decidual tissues, NK cells (dNK) reside in close contact with particular myelomonocytic CD14 + (dCD14 + ) cells. Here we show that the interaction between dNK and dCD14 + cells results in induction of Tregs. The interaction is mediated by soluble factors as shown by transwell experiments, and the prominent role of IFN-γ is revealed by the effect of a neutralizing monoclonal antibody. Following interaction with dNK cells, dCD14 + cells express indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), which, in turn, induces Tregs. Notably, unlike peripheral blood NK (pNK) cells, dNK cells are resistant to inhibition by the IDO metabolite L -kynurenine. “Conditioned” dCD14 + cells also may induce Tregs through transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) production or CTLA-4–mediated interactions, as indicated by the effect of specific neutralizing Abs. Remarkably, only the interaction between dNK and dCD14 + cells results in Treg induction, whereas other coculture combinations involving either NK or CD14 + cells isolated from peripheral blood are ineffective. Our study provides interesting clues to understanding how the crosstalk between decidual NK and CD14 + cells may initiate a process that leads to Treg induction and immunosuppression. Along this line, it is conceivable that an impaired function of these cells may result in pregnancy failure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1001749107

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Vacca, P., Cantoni, C., Vitale, M., Prato, C., Canegallo, F., Fenoglio, D., Ragni, N., Moretta, L., & Mingari, M. C.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-06-14
Volume
107
Issue
26
Pages
11918-11923
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2072910092
Cited by
256
References
3
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crosstalk between decidual NK and CD14 + myelomonocytic cells results in induction of Tregs and immunosuppression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1001749107
The paper
Vacca, P., Cantoni, C., Vitale, M., Prato, C., Canegallo, F., Fenoglio, D., Ragni, N., Moretta, L., & Mingari, M. C. (2010). Crosstalk between decidual NK and CD14 + myelomonocytic cells results in induction of Tregs and immunosuppression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001749107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.