Cited by 112Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies

Occurrence of maize detritus and a transgenic insecticidal protein (Cry1Ab) within the stream network of an agricultural landscape

Open access
Tank, Jennifer L., Rosi-Marshall, Emma J., Royer, Todd V., Whiles, Matt R., Griffiths, Natalie A., Frauendorf, Therese C., Treering, David J.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Widespread planting of maize throughout the agricultural Midwest may result in detritus entering adjacent stream ecosystems, and 63% of the 2009 US maize crop was genetically modified to express insecticidal Cry proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis. Six months after harvest, we conducted a synoptic survey of 217 stream sites in Indiana to determine the extent of maize detritus and presence of Cry1Ab protein in the stream network. We found that 86% of stream sites contained maize leaves, cobs, husks, and/or stalks in the active stream channel. We also detected Cry1Ab protein in stream-channel maize at 13% of sites and in the water column at 23% of sites. We found that 82% of stream sites were adjacent to maize fields, and Geographical Information Systems analyses indicated that 100% of sites containing Cry1Ab-positive detritus in the active stream channel had maize planted within 500 m during the previous crop year. Maize detritus likely enters streams throughout the Corn Belt; using US Department of Agriculture land cover data, we estimate that 91% of the 256,446 km of streams/rivers in Iowa, Illinois, and Indiana are located within 500 m of a maize field. Maize detritus is common in low-gradient stream channels in northwestern Indiana, and Cry1Ab proteins persist in maize leaves and can be measured in the water column even 6 mo after harvest. Hence, maize detritus, and associated Cry1Ab proteins, are widely distributed and persistent in the headwater streams of a Corn Belt landscape.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1006925107

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pollen, plant debris, and exudates from living roots or decaying plant material might enter small streams close to agricultural fields, providing potential routes of exposure for aquatic organisms.

    “Pollen, plant debris, and also exudates from living roots or exudes from decaying plant material might enter small streams that often run close to agricultural fields (Rosi-Marshall et al., 2007;Tank et al., 2010).”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Tank et al., 2010

  • Bt protein concentrations in aquatic systems are expected to be very low due to a huge dilution effect of running water.

    “Bt protein concentrations in aquatic systems, however, are expected to be very low due to a huge dilution effect of the running water (Carstens et al., 2012;Tank et al., 2010).”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Tank et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [1]National Agricultural Statistics Service . Acreage. Washington, DC: Agricultural Statistics Board, US Department of Agriculture; 2009. [Accessed March 13, 2010]. Available at http://www.nass.usda.gov. [Google Scholar]
  2. [3]U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . Currently and Previously Registered Section 3 PIP Registrations. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency; 2008. Available at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/pips/pip_list.htm. [Google Scholar]
  3. [11]Zucker LA, Brown LC, editors. Bulletin 871-98. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  4. [24]U.S. Geological Survey . Reston, VA: U.S Geological Survey; 2010. [Accessed July 10, 2009]. USGS surface-water daily data for the nation. Available at http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/dv. [Google Scholar]
  5. [34]Saxena D, Stotzky G. Collection of Biosafety Reviews. Trieste, Italy: International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; 2003. pp. 7–83. [Google Scholar]
  6. [43]National Agricultural Statistics Service . Census of Agriculture. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture; 2007. [Accessed March 13, 2010]. Available at http://www.nass.usda.gov. [Google Scholar]
  7. [47]Natural Resources Conservation Service . Geospatial Data Gateway. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture; 2008. [Accessed July 9, 2009]. Available at http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/ [Google Scholar]
  8. [48]National Agricultural Statistics Service . Washington, DC: Cropland Data Layer. Research and Development Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture; 2008. [Accessed July 9, 2009]. Available at http://www.nass.usda.gov/research/Cropland/SARS1a.htm. [Google Scholar]
  9. [49]U.S. Geological Survey . National Hydrology Dataset. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior; 2008. [Accessed May 23, 2006]. Available at http://nhd.usgs.gov/ [Google Scholar]
  10. [50]Environmental Systems Research Institute . ArcGIS 9, ESRI Data & Maps 9.3, Data & Maps and StreetMap North America, Disk# 110759, Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  11. [51]Environmental Systems Research Institute . ArcGIS Desktop 9, ArcView 9.3, Single Use, Disk# 110746. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute; 2008. Available at http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcview/index.html. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tank, J. L., Rosi-Marshall, E. J., Royer, T. V., Whiles, M. R., Griffiths, N. A., Frauendorf, T. C., & Treering, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • Department of Biology, Loyola University, Chicago, IL 60660;
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-09-27
Volume
107
Issue
41
Pages
17645-17650
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2112608511
Cited by
112
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 16
FWCI
11.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0415984)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Keywords
Cry1Ab toxin, Bacillus thuringiensis, transgenic maize, agricultural runoff, stream ecosystems, headwater streams, agricultural landscapes, land cover, Corn Belt, Indiana, Iowa, Illinois
MeSH terms
Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins, Agriculture, Bacterial Proteins, Zea mays, Endotoxins, Environmental Monitoring, Hemolysin Proteins, Indiana, Insecticides, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Plants, Genetically Modified, Plant Components, Aerial, Geographic Information Systems, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review