The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phantom percepts: Tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks
Open accessAbstract
Phantom perception refers to the conscious awareness of a percept in the absence of an external stimulus. On the basis of basic neuroscience on perception and clinical research in phantom pain and phantom sound, we propose a working model for their origin. Sensory deafferentation results in high-frequency, gamma band, synchronized neuronal activity in the sensory cortex. This activity becomes a conscious percept only if it is connected to larger coactivated “(self-)awareness” and “salience” brain networks. Through the involvement of learning mechanisms, the phantom percept becomes associated to distress, which in turn is reflected by a simultaneously coactivated nonspecific distress network consisting of the anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, and amygdala. Memory mechanisms play a role in the persistence of the awareness of the phantom percept, as well as in the reinforcement of the associated distress. Thus, different dynamic overlapping brain networks should be considered as targets for the treatment of this disorder.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2575 · Cited by 11,820
The Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease
Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 · Cited by 9,761
Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control
Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A. F., Keller, J., Glover, G. H., Kenna, H., Reiss, A. L., & Greicius, M. D. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5587-06.2007 · Cited by 7,426
Hearing lips and seeing voices
MCGURK, H., & MACDONALD, J. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/264746a0 · Cited by 6,183
High Gamma Power Is Phase-Locked to Theta Oscillations in Human Neocortex
Canolty, R. T., Edwards, E., Dalal, S. S., Soltani, M., Nagarajan, S. S., Kirsch, H. E., Berger, M. S., Barbaro, N. M., & Knight, R. T. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128115 · Cited by 2,650
Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain
Price, D. D. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5472.1769 · Cited by 2,092
CORTICAL PLASTICITY: From Synapses to Maps
Buonomano, D. V., & Merzenich, M. M. (1998) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.149 · Cited by 2,083 · cited 1×
“Topographic development and reorganization in all sensory areas of adult cortex are governed by similar/common mechanisms of synaptic plasticity (23), likely explaining the analogy between phantom pain and tinnitus.”
BackgroundConscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy
Dehaene, S., Changeux, J.-P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007 · Cited by 2,067
Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation
Flor, H., Elbert, T., Knecht, S., Wienbruch, C., Pantev, C., Birbaumers, N., Larbig, W., & Taub, E. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/375482a0 · Cited by 1,845
Stress, memory and the amygdala
Roozendaal, B., McEwen, B. S., & Chattarji, S. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2651 · Cited by 1,760
Cited by
Lefaucheur, J.-P., André-Obadia, N., Antal, A., Ayache, S. S., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., Cantello, R. M., Cincotta, M., de Carvalho, M., De Ridder, D., et al. (2014) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021 · Cited by 2,119
Self-citationBaguley, D., McFerran, D., & Hall, D. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60142-7 · Cited by 1,245
Cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus
Martinez-Devesa, P., Perera, R., Theodoulou, M., & Waddell, A. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005233.pub3 · Cited by 477
Maladaptive plasticity in tinnitus — triggers, mechanisms and treatment
Shore, S. E., Roberts, L. E., & Langguth, B. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.12 · Cited by 474
Self-citationCentral gain control in tinnitus and hyperacusis
Auerbach, B. D., Rodrigues, P. V., & Salvi, R. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2014.00206 · Cited by 439
Metadata
- Authors
- De Ridder, D., Elgoyhen, A. B., Romo, R., & Langguth, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-04-18
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 8075-8080
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2061085766
- Cited by
- 620
- References
- 102
- FWCI
- 52.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phantom percepts: Tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1018466108
- The paper
- De Ridder, D., Elgoyhen, A. B., Romo, R., & Langguth, B. (2011). Phantom percepts: Tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018466108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
