Cited by 124Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchCellular Mechanics and InteractionsAxon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling

Cytoskeletal microdifferentiation: a mechanism for organizing morphological plasticity in dendrites

Open access
Kaech, Stefanie, Parmar, Hema, Roelandse, Martijn, Bornmann, Caroline, Matus, Andrew·2001·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Experimental evidence suggests that microfilaments and microtubules play contrasting roles in regulating the balance between motility and stability in neuronal structures. Actin-containing microfilaments are associated with structural plasticity, both during development when their dynamic activity drives the exploratory activity of growth cones and after circuit formation when the actin-rich dendritic spines of excitatory synapses retain a capacity for rapid changes in morphology. By contrast, microtubules predominate in axonal and dendritic processes, which appear to be morphologically relatively more stable. To compare the cytoplasmic distributions and dynamics of microfilaments and microtubules we made time-lapse recordings of actin or the microtubule-associated protein 2 tagged with green fluorescent protein in neurons growing in dispersed culture or in tissue slices from transgenic mice. The results complement existing evidence indicating that the high concentrations of actin present in dendritic spines is a specialization for morphological plasticity. By contrast, microtubule-associated protein 2 is limited to the shafts of dendrites where time-lapse recordings show little evidence for dynamic activity. A parallel exists between the partitioning of microfilaments and microtubules in motile and stable domains of growing processes during development and between dendrite shafts and spines at excitatory synapses in established neuronal circuits. These data thus suggest a mechanism, conserved through development and adulthood, in which the differential dynamics of actin and microtubules determine the plasticity of neuronal structures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.111146798

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LMW MAP2C lacking PD still localizes to the soma and dendrites.

    “although LMW MAP2C lacking PD still localizes to the soma and dendrites (11).”

    From Active transport by cytoplasmic dynein sustains dendritic MAP2 localization in developing neurons (2026) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results (page unavailable) report that MAP2c-GFP is detectable in dendrites and, more weakly, in cell bodies. They do not report localization of MAP2c lacking PD, so the deletion-specific part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Expressed MAP2 without any native mRNA structures such as a 3′-untranslated region still localizes properly to dendrites.

    “However, we (this paper) and others have shown that expressed MAP2 without any native mRNA structures such as a 3′-untranslated region, which are typically necessary for mRNA transport and local translation (55), still localizes properly to dendrites (11).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. [1]Matus A, Huber G, Bernhardt R. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol. 1983;48:775–782. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.048.01.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. [2]Craig A M, Banker G. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1994;17:267–310. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.17.030194.001411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. [3]Bradke F, Dotti C G. Science. 1999;283:1931–1934. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5409.1931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. [4]Mitchison T, Kirschner M. Neuron. 1988;1:761–772. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(88)90124-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  5. [5]Smith S J. Science. 1988;242:708–715. doi: 10.1126/science.3055292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  6. [6]Gordon-Weeks P R. BioEssays. 1991;13:235–239. doi: 10.1002/bies.950130506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. [7]Avila J, Dominguez J, Diaz-Nido J. Int J Dev Biol. 1994;38:13–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. [8]Tanaka E, Sabry J. Cell. 1995;83:171–176. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90158-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. [9]Heidemann S R. Int Rev Cytol. 1996;165:235–296. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62224-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [10]Letourneau P C. Perspect Dev Neurobiol. 1996;4:111–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. [11]Matus A, Ackermann M, Pehling G, Byers H R, Fujiwara K. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79:7590–7594. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.23.7590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  12. [12]Fifkova E. Brain Res. 1985;356:187–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. [13]Kaech S, Fisher M, Doll T, Matus A. J Neurosci. 1997;17:9565–9572. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-24-09565.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  14. [16]Halpain S. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23:141–146. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01576-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  15. [17]Lendvai B, Stern E A, Chen B, Svoboda K. Nature (London) 2000;404:876–881. doi: 10.1038/35009107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  16. [18]Matus A. Science. 2000;290:754–758. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5492.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  17. [19]Matus A, Bernhardt R, Hugh-Jones T. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981;78:3010–3014. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.5.3010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. [20]Bernhardt R, Matus A. J Cell Biol. 1982;92:589–593. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.2.589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. [21]Burgoyne R D, Cumming R. Neuroscience. 1984;11:156–167. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(84)90220-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. [22]De Camilli P, Miller P E, Navone F, Theurkauf W E, Vallee R B. Neuroscience. 1984;11:817–846. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. [23]Huber G, Matus A. J Cell Biol. 1984;98:777–781. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.2.777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. [24]Peters A, Palay S L, Webster H d F. The Fine Structure of the Nervous System. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1976. [Google Scholar]
  23. [25]Landis D M, Reese T S. J Cell Biol. 1983;97:1169–1178. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.4.1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. [27]Caceres A, Banker G, Steward O, Binder L, Payne M. Brain Res. 1984;315:314–318. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(84)90167-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  25. [28]Morales M, Fifkova E. Cell Tissue Res. 1989;256:447–456. doi: 10.1007/BF00225592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  26. [29]Sattilaro R F. Biochemistry. 1986;25:2003–2009. doi: 10.1021/bi00356a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  27. [30]Selden S C, Pollard T D. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1986;466:803–812. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb38464.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  28. [31]Takemura R, Okabe S, Umeyama T, Kanai Y, Cowan N J, Hirokawa N. J Cell Sci. 1992;103:953–964. doi: 10.1242/jcs.103.4.953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  29. [32]Weisshaar B, Doll T, Matus A. Development (Cambridge, UK) 1992;116:1151–1161. doi: 10.1242/dev.116.4.1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  30. [33]Kaech S, Ludin B, Matus A. Neuron. 1996;17:1189–1199. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80249-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  31. [34]Ozer R S, Halpain S. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:3573–3587. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.10.3573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  32. [35]Colella R, Lu C, Hodges B, Wilkey D W, Roisen F J. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 2000;121:1–9. doi: 10.1016/s0165-3806(00)00018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  33. [36]van Rossum D, Hanisch U K. Trends Neurosci. 1999;22:290–295. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(99)01404-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  34. [37]Harris K M. Curr Opin Neurol. 1999;9:343–348. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(99)80050-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  35. [38]Jontes J D, Smith S J. Neuron. 2000;27:11–14. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00003-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  36. [39]Parnass Z, Tashiro A, Yuste R. Hippocampus. 2000;10:561–568. doi: 10.1002/1098-1063(2000)10:5<561::AID-HIPO6>3.0.CO;2-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  37. [40]Ludin B, Matus A. Trends Cell Biol. 1998;8:72–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. [41]Ormö M, Cubitt A B, Kallio K, Gross L A, Tsien R Y, Remington S J. Science. 1996;273:1392–1395. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5280.1392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  39. [42]Fischer M, Kaech S, Wagner U, Brinkhaus H, Matus A. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:887–894. doi: 10.1038/78791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  40. [43]Botteri F M, van der Putten H, Wong D F, Sauvage C A, Evans R M. Mol Cell Biol. 1987;7:3178–3184. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.9.3178-3184.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  41. [44]Gahwiler B H, Thompson S M, Audinat E, Robertson R T. In: Culturing Nerve Cells. Banker G, Goslin K, editors. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1991. pp. 379–411. [Google Scholar]
  42. [45]Bartlett W P, Banker G A. J Neurosci. 1984;4:1954–1965. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-08-01954.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  43. [46]Papa M, Bundman M C, Greenberger V, Segal M. J Neurosci. 1995;15:1–11. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-01-00001.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  44. [47]Ziv N E, Smith S J. Neuron. 1996;17:91–102. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80283-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  45. [48]Boyer C, Schikorski T, Stevens C F. J Neurosci. 1998;18:5294–5300. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-14-05294.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  46. [49]Fiala J C, Feinberg M, Popov V, Harris K M. J Neurosci. 1998;18:8900–8911. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-21-08900.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  47. [50]Matus A. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1988;11:29–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.11.030188.000333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  48. [51]Marsden K M, Doll T, Ferralli J, Botteri F, Matus A. J Neurosci. 1996;16:3265–3273. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-10-03265.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  49. [52]Bliss T V, Collingridge G L. Nature (London) 1993;361:31–39. doi: 10.1038/361031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  50. [53]Andersen P, Moser E, Moser M B, Trommald M. J Physiol (Paris) 1996;90:349. doi: 10.1016/s0928-4257(97)87917-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  51. [54]Engert F, Bonhoeffer T. Nature (London) 1999;399:66–70. doi: 10.1038/19978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  52. [55]Maletic-Savatic M, Malinow R, Svoboda K. Science. 1999;283:1923–1927. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5409.1923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  53. [56]Toni N, Buchs P A, Nikonenko I, Bron C R, Muller D. Nature (London) 1999;402:421–425. doi: 10.1038/46574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  54. [57]Chicurel M E, Harris K M. J Comp Neurol. 1992;325:169–182. doi: 10.1002/cne.903250204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  55. [58]Garner C C, Tucker R P, Matus A. Nature (London) 1988;336:674–677. doi: 10.1038/336674a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  56. [59]Steward O, Banker G A. Trends Neurosci. 1992;15:180–186. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90170-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  57. [60]Schuman E M. Neuron. 1999;23:645–648. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)80023-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  58. [61]Brady S T. Trends Cell Biol. 1995;5:159–164. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)88980-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  59. [62]Hirokawa N. Science. 1998;279:519–526. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5350.519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  60. [63]Burack M A, Silverman M A, Banker G. Neuron. 2000;26:465–472. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81178-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  61. [64]Terada S, Hirokawa N. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2000;10:566–573. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00129-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  62. [65]Setou M, Nakagawa T, Seog D H, Hirokawa N. Science. 2000;288:1796–1802. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5472.1796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  63. [66]Gavin R H. Int Rev Cytol. 1997;173:207–242. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62478-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  64. [67]Goode B L, Drubin D G, Barnes G. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000;12:63–71. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(99)00058-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  65. [68]Huang J D, Brady S T, Richards B W, Stenolen D, Resau J H, Copeland N G, Jenkins N A. Nature (London) 1999;397:267–270. doi: 10.1038/16722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  66. [69]Nishimune A, Isaac J T, Molnar E, Noel J, Nash S R, Tagaya M, Collingridge G L, Nakanishi S, Henley J M. Neuron. 1998;21:87–97. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80517-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  67. [70]Song I, Kamboj S, Xia J, Dong H, Liao D, Huganir R L. Neuron. 1998;21:393–400. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80548-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  68. [71]Shi S H, Hayashi Y, Petralia R S, Zaman S H, Wenthold R J, Svoboda K, Malinow R. Science. 1999;284:1811–1816. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5421.1811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  69. [72]Zhu J J, Esteban J A, Hayashi Y, Malinow R. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:1098–1106. doi: 10.1038/80614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  70. [73]Purves D, Hadley R D. Nature (London) 1985;315:404–406. doi: 10.1038/315404a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  71. [74]Purves D, Hadley R D, Voyvodic J T. J Neurosci. 1986;6:1051–1060. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-04-01051.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  72. [76]Coss R G, Brandon J G, Globus A. Brain Res. 1980;192:49–59. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)91007-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  73. [77]Woolley C S, McEwen B S. J Comp Neurol. 1993;336:293–306. doi: 10.1002/cne.903360210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  74. [78]Moser M B, Trommald M, Egeland T, Andersen P. J Comp Neurol. 1997;380:373–381. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19970414)380:3<373::aid-cne6>3.0.co;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaech, S., Parmar, H., Roelandse, M., Bornmann, C., & Matus, A.
Affiliations
Friedrich Miescher Institute (CH)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2001-06-19
Volume
98
Issue
13
Pages
7086-7092
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2170191832
Cited by
124
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Keywords
dendritic morphological plasticity, dendritic spines, F-actin, microtubules, MAP2, cytoskeletal dynamics, excitatory synapses, neuronal development, time-lapse imaging
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Chickens, Cytoskeleton, Dendrites, Hippocampus, Luminescent Proteins, Mice, Transgenic, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Transfection, Genes, Reporter, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review