The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Density-dependent fitness benefits in quorum-sensing bacterial populations
Open accessAbstract
It has been argued that bacteria communicate using small diffusible signal molecules to coordinate, among other things, the production of factors that are secreted outside of the cells in a process known as quorum sensing (QS). The underlying assumption made to explain QS is that the secretion of these extracellular factors is more beneficial at higher cell densities. However, this fundamental assumption has never been tested experimentally. Here, we directly test this by independently manipulating population density and the induction and response to the QS signal, using the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a model organism. We found that the benefit of QS was relatively greater at higher population densities, and that this was because of more efficient use of QS-dependent extracellular “public goods.” In contrast, the benefit of producing “private goods,” which are retained within the cell, does not vary with cell density. Overall, these results support the idea that QS is used to coordinate the switching on of social behaviors at high densities when such behaviors are more efficient and will provide the greatest benefit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection.
WEST, S. A., GRIFFIN, A. S., & GARDNER, A. (2007) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01258.x · Cited by 1,889
Self-citation
Cited by
Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments
Mukherjee, S., & Bassler, B. L. (2019) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0186-5 · Cited by 1,374
Quorum sensing triggers the stochastic escape of individual cells from Pseudomonas putida biofilms
Cárcamo-Oyarce, G., Lumjiaktase, P., Kümmerli, R., & Eberl, L. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6945 · Cited by 958
Bacterial Quorum Sensing and Metabolic Incentives to Cooperate
Dandekar, A. A., Chugani, S., & Greenberg, E. P. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1227289 · Cited by 332
Trans-mitochondrial coordination of cristae at regulated membrane junctions
Picard, M., McManus, M. J., Csordás, G., Várnai, P., Dorn II, G. W., Williams, D., Hajnóczky, G., & Wallace, D. C. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7259 · Cited by 166
Control of bacterial metabolism by quorum sensing
Goo, E., An, J. H., Kang, Y., & Hwang, I. (2015) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.007 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Darch, S. E., West, S. A., Winzer, K., & Diggle, S. P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-05-07
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 8259-8263
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2106758768
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Density-dependent fitness benefits in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1118131109
- The paper
- Darch, S. E., West, S. A., Winzer, K., & Diggle, S. P. (2012). Density-dependent fitness benefits in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118131109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.