Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 496

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A vector-free microfluidic platform for intracellular delivery

Open access
Sharei, Armon, Zoldan, Janet, Adamo, Andrea, Sim, Woo Young, Cho, Nahyun, Jackson, Emily, Mao, Shirley, Schneider, Sabine, Han, Min-Joon, Lytton-Jean, Abigail, Basto, Pamela A., Jhunjhunwala, Siddharth, Lee, Jungmin, Heller, Daniel A., Kang, Jeon Woong, Hartoularos, George C., Kim, Kwang-Soo, Anderson, Daniel G., Langer, Robert, Jensen, Klavs F.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Intracellular delivery of macromolecules is a challenge in research and therapeutic applications. Existing vector-based and physical methods have limitations, including their reliance on exogenous materials or electrical fields, which can lead to toxicity or off-target effects. We describe a microfluidic approach to delivery in which cells are mechanically deformed as they pass through a constriction 30–80% smaller than the cell diameter. The resulting controlled application of compression and shear forces results in the formation of transient holes that enable the diffusion of material from the surrounding buffer into the cytosol. The method has demonstrated the ability to deliver a range of material, such as carbon nanotubes, proteins, and siRNA, to 11 cell types, including embryonic stem cells and immune cells. When used for the delivery of transcription factors, the microfluidic devices produced a 10-fold improvement in colony formation relative to electroporation and cell-penetrating peptides. Indeed, its ability to deliver structurally diverse materials and its applicability to difficult-to-transfect primary cells indicate that this method could potentially enable many research and clinical applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1218705110

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 496

Metadata

Authors
Sharei, A., Zoldan, J., Adamo, A., Sim, W. Y., Cho, N., Jackson, E., Mao, S., Schneider, S., Han, M.-J., Lytton-Jean, A., Basto, P. A., Jhunjhunwala, S., Lee, J., Heller, D. A., Kang, J. W., Hartoularos, G. C., Kim, K.-S., Anderson, D. G., Langer, R., & Jensen, K. F.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-01-22
Volume
110
Issue
6
Pages
2082-2087
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2112424756
Cited by
496
References
4
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A vector-free microfluidic platform for intracellular delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1218705110
The paper
Sharei, A., Zoldan, J., Adamo, A., Sim, W. Y., Cho, N., Jackson, E., Mao, S., Schneider, S., Han, M.-J., Lytton-Jean, A., Basto, P. A., Jhunjhunwala, S., Lee, J., Heller, D. A., Kang, J. W., Hartoularos, G. C., Kim, K.-S., Anderson, D. G., Langer, R., & Jensen, K. F. (2013). A vector-free microfluidic platform for intracellular delivery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218705110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.