The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental productivity predicts migration, demographic, and linguistic patterns in prehistoric California
Abstract
Global patterns of ethnolinguistic diversity vary tremendously. Some regions show very little variation even across vast expanses, whereas others exhibit dense mosaics of different languages spoken alongside one another. Compared with the rest of Native North America, prehistoric California exemplified the latter. Decades of linguistic, genetic, and archaeological research have produced detailed accounts of the migrations that aggregated to build California’s diverse ethnolinguistic mosaic, but there have been few have attempts to explain the process underpinning these migrations and why such a mosaic did not develop elsewhere. Here we show that environmental productivity predicts both the order of migration events and the population density recorded at contact. The earliest colonizers occupied the most suitable habitats along the coast, whereas subsequent Mid–Late Holocene migrants settled in more marginal habitats. Other Late Holocene patterns diverge from this trend, reflecting altered dynamics linked to food storage and increased sedentism. Through repeated migration events, incoming populations replaced resident populations occurring at lower densities in lower-productivity habitats, thereby resulting in the fragmentation of earlier groups and the development of one of the most diverse ethnolinguistic patterns in the Americas. Such a process may account for the distribution of ethnolinguistic diversity worldwide.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Codding and Jones (2013) showed that ethno-historic population densities in California follow IDM predictions, with higher population densities occurring in more suitable habitats.
“For example, Codding and Jones (2013) showed that ethno-historic population densities in California follow IDM predictions, with higher population densities occurring in more suitable habitats.”
From The Ideal Distribution Model and Archaeological Settlement Patterning (2022) · cites this paper as Codding and Jones 2013
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- AL Kroeber Handbook of the Indians of California (Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, DC, 1925).
- , ed RF Heizer (Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC) Handbook of North American Indians: California Vol 8 (1978).
- M Moratto California Archaeology (Academic, New York, 1984).
- V Golla California Prehistory, eds TL Jones, K Klar (Alta Mira Press, Lanham, MD, 2007).
- 10.1525/9780520949522 · DOI
- Currie TE Mace R (2012) The evolution of ethnolinguistic diversity. Adv Complex Syst 15(1):1150006. · DOI
- 10.1086/281776 · DOI
- MA Baumhoff, Ecological determinants of aboriginal California populations. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology Vol 49, 155–236 (1963).
- 10.1126/science.1078208 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/280231 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01601953 · DOI · Paper page
- S Fretwell Populations in a Seasonal Environment (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ, 1972).
- Allen J O’Connell JF (2008) Islands of Inquiry: Colonization Seafaring and the Archaeology of Maritime Landscapes eds Clark G Leach F O’Connor S (ANU E Press Canberra Australia) Terra Australis No. 29 pp 31–46.
- 10.1525/9780520931435 · DOI · Paper page
- D Kennett, AJ Anderson, B Winterhalder Human Behavioral Ecology and the Origins of Agriculture, eds DJ Kennett, B Winterhalder (Univ of California Press, Berkeley), pp. 265–288 (2006).
- 10.1080/03122417.2012.11681932 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jaa.2010.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Kennett DJ Winterhalder B (2008) Islands of Inquiry: Colonization Seafaring and the Archaeology of Meritime Landscapes eds Clark G Leach F O'Connor S (ANU E Press Canberra Australia) Terra Australis No. 29.
- DJ Kennett, B Winterhalder, J Bartruff, JM Erlandson Pattern and Process in Cultural Evolution, ed S Shennan (Univ of California Press, Berkeley, 2009).
- 10.1525/aa.1978.80.1.02a00020 · DOI · Paper page
- JR Johnson, BM Kemp, C Monroe, JG Lorenz Contemporary Issues in California Archaeology, eds TL Jones, JE Perry (Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA), pp. 49–72 (2012).
- JR Johnson, JG Lorenz, Genetics, linguistics, and prehistoric migrations: An analysis of California Indian mitochondrial DNA lineages. J Calif Gt Basin Anthropol 26, 33–64 (2006).
- 10.1002/ajpa.1051 · DOI
- AB Potter, PS White, The mitochondrial DNA affinities of the prehistoric people of San Clemente Island: An analysis of ancient DNA. J Calif Gt Basin Anthropol 29, 163–181 (2009).
- KB Schroeder, G Villa, RS Malhi, AR Rode, DG Smith, Biological continuity in the Central Valley: Evidence from ancient and modern mitochondrial DNA. J Calif Gt Basin Anthropol 31, 39–58 (2011).
- 10.1086/464442 · DOI
- MQ Sutton, People and language: The Takic expansion into southern California. Pacific Coast Archaeol Soc Quar 41, 31–94 (2009).
- SF Cook The Aboriginal Population of the San Joaquin Valley (Univ of California Publications, Berkeley, CA, 1955).
- SF Cook The Aboriginal Population of the North Coast of California: Anthropological Records (Univ of California Publications, Berkeley, CA) Vol 16 (1956).
- SF Cook The Population of the California Indians 1769–1970 (Univ of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1976).
- 10.1126/science.1201477 · DOI
- BF Codding, DW Bird, TL Jones Contemporary Issues in California Archaeology, eds TL Jones, JE Perry (Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA), pp. 115–131 (2012).
- PM Bickel, Changing sea levels along the California coast: Anthropological implications. J Calif Anthropol 5, 6–20 (1978).
- 10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.07.019 · DOI
- RF Schalk For Theory Building in Archaeology: Essays on Faunal Remains, Aquatic Resources, Spatial Analysis, and Systemic Modeling, ed LR Binford (Academic, New York), pp. 207–249 (1977).
- Tushingham S (2009) The development of intensive foraging systems in Northwestern California. PhD thesis (Univ of California Davis).
- WR Hildebrandt California Prehistory, eds TL Jones, K Klar (Altamira Press, Lanham, MD), pp. 83–98 (2007).
- 10.1002/evan.21348 · DOI
- 10.1002/evan.21358 · DOI
- 10.1086/200002 · DOI
- 10.2307/280893 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1153569 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226027524.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1038/485024a · DOI
- ; ESRI Arcmap 10.0, ArcGIS Desktop 10. service pack 2 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA, 2012).
- LR Binford Constructing Frames of Reference (Univ of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 2001).
- ; R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2012).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Taylor, A. H., Trouet, V., Skinner, C. N., & Stephens, S. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1609775113 · Cited by 228
Yaworsky, P. M., Vernon, K. B., Spangler, J. D., Brewer, S. C., & Codding, B. F. (2020) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239424 · Cited by 104
Self-citationFire mosaics and habitat choice in nomadic foragers
Bliege Bird, R., McGuire, C., Bird, D. W., Price, M. H., Zeanah, D., & Nimmo, D. G. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1921709117 · Cited by 64
The Ideal Distribution Model and Archaeological Settlement Patterning
Weitzel, E. M., & Codding, B. F. (2022) · Environmental Archaeology · doi:10.1080/14614103.2020.1803015 · Cited by 49
Self-citationDavis, D. S., Andriankaja, V., Carnat, T. L., Chrisostome, Z. M., Colombe, C., Fenomanana, F., Hubertine, L., Justome, R., Lahiniriko, F., Léonce, H., et al. (2020) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2020.105097 · Cited by 40
Site suitability modeling with culturally-specific variables: A southern Northwest Coast case study
Helmer, E., & Brown, J. W. (2021) · Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102866 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Codding, B. F., & Jones, T. L.
- Affiliations
- Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 and
- Department of Social Sciences, California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-08-19
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 14569-14573
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review