Cited by 82

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Environmental productivity predicts migration, demographic, and linguistic patterns in prehistoric California

Codding, Brian F., Jones, Terry L.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Global patterns of ethnolinguistic diversity vary tremendously. Some regions show very little variation even across vast expanses, whereas others exhibit dense mosaics of different languages spoken alongside one another. Compared with the rest of Native North America, prehistoric California exemplified the latter. Decades of linguistic, genetic, and archaeological research have produced detailed accounts of the migrations that aggregated to build California’s diverse ethnolinguistic mosaic, but there have been few have attempts to explain the process underpinning these migrations and why such a mosaic did not develop elsewhere. Here we show that environmental productivity predicts both the order of migration events and the population density recorded at contact. The earliest colonizers occupied the most suitable habitats along the coast, whereas subsequent Mid–Late Holocene migrants settled in more marginal habitats. Other Late Holocene patterns diverge from this trend, reflecting altered dynamics linked to food storage and increased sedentism. Through repeated migration events, incoming populations replaced resident populations occurring at lower densities in lower-productivity habitats, thereby resulting in the fragmentation of earlier groups and the development of one of the most diverse ethnolinguistic patterns in the Americas. Such a process may account for the distribution of ethnolinguistic diversity worldwide.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1302008110

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Codding and Jones (2013) showed that ethno-historic population densities in California follow IDM predictions, with higher population densities occurring in more suitable habitats.

    “For example, Codding and Jones (2013) showed that ethno-historic population densities in California follow IDM predictions, with higher population densities occurring in more suitable habitats.”

    From The Ideal Distribution Model and Archaeological Settlement Patterning (2022) · cites this paper as Codding and Jones 2013

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. AL Kroeber Handbook of the Indians of California (Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, DC, 1925).
  2. , ed RF Heizer (Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC) Handbook of North American Indians: California Vol 8 (1978).
  3. M Moratto California Archaeology (Academic, New York, 1984).
  4. V Golla California Prehistory, eds TL Jones, K Klar (Alta Mira Press, Lanham, MD, 2007).
  5. 10.1525/9780520949522 · DOI
  6. Currie TE Mace R (2012) The evolution of ethnolinguistic diversity. Adv Complex Syst 15(1):1150006. · DOI
  7. 10.1086/281776 · DOI
  8. MA Baumhoff, Ecological determinants of aboriginal California populations. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology Vol 49, 155–236 (1963).
  9. 10.1126/science.1078208 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.2307/280231 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/BF01601953 · DOI · Paper page
  12. S Fretwell Populations in a Seasonal Environment (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ, 1972).
  13. Allen J O’Connell JF (2008) Islands of Inquiry: Colonization Seafaring and the Archaeology of Maritime Landscapes eds Clark G Leach F O’Connor S (ANU E Press Canberra Australia) Terra Australis No. 29 pp 31–46.
  14. 10.1525/9780520931435 · DOI · Paper page
  15. D Kennett, AJ Anderson, B Winterhalder Human Behavioral Ecology and the Origins of Agriculture, eds DJ Kennett, B Winterhalder (Univ of California Press, Berkeley), pp. 265–288 (2006).
  16. 10.1080/03122417.2012.11681932 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.jaa.2010.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Kennett DJ Winterhalder B (2008) Islands of Inquiry: Colonization Seafaring and the Archaeology of Meritime Landscapes eds Clark G Leach F O'Connor S (ANU E Press Canberra Australia) Terra Australis No. 29.
  19. DJ Kennett, B Winterhalder, J Bartruff, JM Erlandson Pattern and Process in Cultural Evolution, ed S Shennan (Univ of California Press, Berkeley, 2009).
  20. 10.1525/aa.1978.80.1.02a00020 · DOI · Paper page
  21. JR Johnson, BM Kemp, C Monroe, JG Lorenz Contemporary Issues in California Archaeology, eds TL Jones, JE Perry (Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA), pp. 49–72 (2012).
  22. JR Johnson, JG Lorenz, Genetics, linguistics, and prehistoric migrations: An analysis of California Indian mitochondrial DNA lineages. J Calif Gt Basin Anthropol 26, 33–64 (2006).
  23. 10.1002/ajpa.1051 · DOI
  24. AB Potter, PS White, The mitochondrial DNA affinities of the prehistoric people of San Clemente Island: An analysis of ancient DNA. J Calif Gt Basin Anthropol 29, 163–181 (2009).
  25. KB Schroeder, G Villa, RS Malhi, AR Rode, DG Smith, Biological continuity in the Central Valley: Evidence from ancient and modern mitochondrial DNA. J Calif Gt Basin Anthropol 31, 39–58 (2011).
  26. 10.1086/464442 · DOI
  27. MQ Sutton, People and language: The Takic expansion into southern California. Pacific Coast Archaeol Soc Quar 41, 31–94 (2009).
  28. SF Cook The Aboriginal Population of the San Joaquin Valley (Univ of California Publications, Berkeley, CA, 1955).
  29. SF Cook The Aboriginal Population of the North Coast of California: Anthropological Records (Univ of California Publications, Berkeley, CA) Vol 16 (1956).
  30. SF Cook The Population of the California Indians 1769–1970 (Univ of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1976).
  31. 10.1126/science.1201477 · DOI
  32. BF Codding, DW Bird, TL Jones Contemporary Issues in California Archaeology, eds TL Jones, JE Perry (Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA), pp. 115–131 (2012).
  33. PM Bickel, Changing sea levels along the California coast: Anthropological implications. J Calif Anthropol 5, 6–20 (1978).
  34. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.07.019 · DOI
  35. RF Schalk For Theory Building in Archaeology: Essays on Faunal Remains, Aquatic Resources, Spatial Analysis, and Systemic Modeling, ed LR Binford (Academic, New York), pp. 207–249 (1977).
  36. Tushingham S (2009) The development of intensive foraging systems in Northwestern California. PhD thesis (Univ of California Davis).
  37. WR Hildebrandt California Prehistory, eds TL Jones, K Klar (Altamira Press, Lanham, MD), pp. 83–98 (2007).
  38. 10.1002/evan.21348 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/evan.21358 · DOI
  40. 10.1086/200002 · DOI
  41. 10.2307/280893 · DOI
  42. 10.1126/science.1153569 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.7208/chicago/9780226027524.001.0001 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/485024a · DOI
  45. ; ESRI Arcmap 10.0, ArcGIS Desktop 10. service pack 2 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA, 2012).
  46. LR Binford Constructing Frames of Reference (Univ of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 2001).
  47. ; R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2012).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Codding, B. F., & Jones, T. L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 and
  • Department of Social Sciences, California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-08-19
Volume
110
Issue
36
Pages
14569-14573
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
82
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review