Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Population genomics of the honey bee reveals strong signatures of positive selection on worker traits

Harpur, Brock A., Kent, Clement F., Molodtsova, Daria, Lebon, Jonathan M. D., Alqarni, Abdulaziz S., Owayss, Ayman A., Zayed, Amro·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1315506111
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Significance: Most hypotheses explaining the evolution of sociality in insects assume that positive selection drives the evolution of worker traits. Yet we know little about the extent of natural selection acting on social insects. We produced a map of positive selection for the honey bee through analysis of 40 individual genomes. We found strong evidence of positive selection acting on genes and regulatory sequences, and we discovered that mutations in worker-biased proteins tend to have greater fitness effects than mutations in queen-biased proteins. We also found many instances of positive selection acting on genes that influence worker traits, suggesting that worker phenotypes represent a major vector for adaptation in social insects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1315506111

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. EO Wilson, B Hölldobler, Eusociality: Origin and consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 13367–13371 (2005). · DOI
  2. C Darwin The Origin of Species (P. F. Collier & Son, New York, 1909).
  3. WD Hamilton, The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol 7, 17–52 (1964). · DOI
  4. EO Wilson, The sociogenesis of insect colonies. Science 228, 1489–1495 (1985). · DOI · Paper page
  5. RR Sagili, T Pankiw, BN Metz, Division of labor associated with brood rearing in the honey bee: How does it translate to colony fitness? PLoS ONE 6, e16785 (2011). · DOI
  6. MK Wray, HR Mattila, TD Seeley, Collective personalities in honeybee colonies are linked to colony fitness. Anim Behav 81, 559–568 (2011). · DOI
  7. JE Strassmann, RE Page, GE Robinson, TD Seeley, Kin selection and eusociality. Nature 471, E5–E6, author reply E9–E10. (2011). · DOI
  8. P Abbot, et al., Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature 471, E1–E4, and author reply E9–E10. (2011). · DOI
  9. DJ Begun, et al., Population genomics: Whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Biol 5, e310 (2007). · DOI
  10. KE Eilertson, JG Booth, CD Bustamante, SnIPRE: Selection inference using a Poisson random effects model. PLOS Comput Biol 8, e1002806 (2012). · DOI
  11. JM Akey, G Zhang, K Zhang, L Jin, MD Shriver, Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection. Genome Res 12, 1805–1814 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  12. R Nielsen, Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu Rev Genet 39, 197–218 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  13. S Qanbari, et al., A high resolution genome-wide scan for significant selective sweeps: An application to pooled sequence data in laying chickens. PLoS ONE 7, e49525 (2012). · DOI
  14. PA Hohenlohe, et al., Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags. PLoS Genet 6, e1000862 (2010). · DOI
  15. QW Chan, et al., Honey bee protein atlas at organ-level resolution. Genome Res 23, 1951–1960 (2013). · DOI
  16. S Chandrasekaran, et al., Behavior-specific changes in transcriptional modules lead to distinct and predictable neurogenomic states. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 18020–18025 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  17. GM Weinstock, et al., Insights into social insects from the genome of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Nature; Honeybee Genome Sequencing Consortium 443, 931–949 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  18. F Ruttner Biogeography and Taxonomy of Honeybees (Springer, New York, 1988). · DOI
  19. CW Whitfield, et al., Thrice out of Africa: Ancient and recent expansions of the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Science 314, 642–645 (2006). · DOI
  20. A Zayed, CW Whitfield, A genome-wide signature of positive selection in ancient and recent invasive expansions of the honey bee Apis mellifera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 3421–3426 (2008). · DOI
  21. J Chávez-Galarza, et al., Signatures of selection in the Iberian honey bee (Apis mellifera iberiensis) revealed by a genome scan analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Mol Ecol 22, 5890–5907 (2013). · DOI
  22. BA Harpur, S Minaei, CF Kent, A Zayed, Management increases genetic diversity of honey bees via admixture. Mol Ecol 21, 4414–4421 (2012). · DOI
  23. MC Arias, WS Sheppard, Phylogenetic relationships of honey bees (Hymenoptera:Apinae:Apini) inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Mol Phylogenet Evol 37, 25–35 (2005). · DOI
  24. U Kotthoff, T Wappler, MS Engel, Greater past disparity and diversity hints at ancient migrations of European honey bee lineages into Africa and Asia. J Biogeogr 40, 1832–1838 (2013). · DOI
  25. DL Hartl, AG Clark Principles of Population Genetics (Sinauer Associates, 4th Ed, Sunderland, MA, 2007).
  26. CD Bustamante, et al., Natural selection on protein-coding genes in the human genome. Nature 437, 1153–1157 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  27. CF Kent, A Issa, AC Bunting, A Zayed, Adaptive evolution of a key gene affecting queen and worker traits in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Mol Ecol 20, 5226–5235 (2011). · DOI
  28. W Huang, BT Sherman, RA Lempicki, Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4, 44–57 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  29. DF Simola, et al., Social insect genomes exhibit dramatic evolution in gene composition and regulation while preserving regulatory features linked to sociality. Genome Res 23, 1235–1247 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  30. B Feldmeyer, D Elsner, S Foitzik, Gene expression patterns associated with caste and reproductive status in ants: Worker-specific genes are more derived than queen-specific ones. Mol Ecol 23, 151–161 (2014). · DOI
  31. BR Johnson, ND Tsutsui, Taxonomically restricted genes are associated with the evolution of sociality in the honey bee. BMC Genomics 12, 164 (2011). · DOI
  32. PG Ferreira, et al., Transcriptome analyses of primitively eusocial wasps reveal novel insights into the evolution of sociality and the origin of alternative phenotypes. Genome Biol 14, R20 (2013). · DOI
  33. RM Waterhouse, F Tegenfeldt, J Li, EM Zdobnov, EV Kriventseva, OrthoDB: A hierarchical catalog of animal, fungal and bacterial orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res 41, D358–D365 (2013). · DOI
  34. RA Fisher The Genetic Theory of Natural Selection (Dover, New York, 1930). · DOI · Paper page
  35. A Zayed, GE Robinson, Understanding the relationship between brain gene expression and social behavior: Lessons from the honey bee. Annu Rev Genet 46, 591–615 (2012). · DOI
  36. CW Whitfield, et al., Genomic dissection of behavioral maturation in the honey bee. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 16068–16075 (2006). · DOI
  37. ML Winston The Biology of the Honey Bee (Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987).
  38. Y Wang, et al., Down-regulation of honey bee IRS gene biases behavior toward food rich in protein. PLoS Genet 6, e1000896 (2010). · DOI
  39. CM Nelson, KE Ihle, MK Fondrk, REJ Page, GV Amdam, The gene vitellogenin has multiple coordinating effects on social organization. PLoS Biol 5, e62 (2007). · DOI
  40. SA Ament, et al., The transcription factor ultraspiracle influences honey bee social behavior and behavior-related gene expression. PLoS Genet 8, e1002596 (2012). · DOI
  41. SA Ament, Y Wang, GE Robinson, Nutritional regulation of division of labor in honey bees: Toward a systems biology perspective. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 2, 566–576 (2010). · DOI
  42. SA Ament, M Corona, HS Pollock, GE Robinson, Insulin signaling is involved in the regulation of worker division of labor in honey bee colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 4226–4231 (2008). · DOI
  43. JP Sullivan, SE Fahrbach, GE Robinson, Juvenile hormone paces behavioral development in the adult worker honey bee. Horm Behav 37, 1–14 (2000). · DOI
  44. GV Amdam, SW Omholt, The hive bee to forager transition in honeybee colonies: The double repressor hypothesis. J Theor Biol 223, 451–464 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  45. GV Amdam, K Norberg, A Hagen, SW Omholt, Social exploitation of vitellogenin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 1799–1802 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  46. GV Amdam, K Norberg, MK Fondrk, RE Page, Reproductive ground plan may mediate colony-level selection effects on individual foraging behavior in honey bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 11350–11355 (2004). · DOI
  47. M Corona, et al., Vitellogenin, juvenile hormone, insulin signaling, and queen honey bee longevity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 7128–7133 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  48. M Li, EA Mead, J Zhu, Heterodimer of two bHLH-PAS proteins mediates juvenile hormone-induced gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 638–643 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  49. TJ Bernardo, EB Dubrovsky, The Drosophila juvenile hormone receptor candidates methoprene-tolerant (MET) and germ cell-expressed (GCE) utilize a conserved LIXXL motif to bind the FTZ-F1 nuclear receptor. J Biol Chem 287, 7821–7833 (2012). · DOI
  50. Y Ben-Shahar, A Robichon, MB Sokolowski, GE Robinson, Influence of gene action across different time scales on behavior. Science 296, 741–744 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  51. Y Ben-Shahar, NL Dudek, GE Robinson, Phenotypic deconstruction reveals involvement of manganese transporter malvolio in honey bee division of labor. J Exp Biol 207, 3281–3288 (2004). · DOI
  52. MD Drapeau, S Albert, R Kucharski, C Prusko, R Maleszka, Evolution of the Yellow/Major Royal Jelly Protein family and the emergence of social behavior in honey bees. Genome Res 16, 1385–1394 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  53. M Kamakura, Royalactin induces queen differentiation in honeybees. Nature 473, 478–483 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  54. AL Toth, GE Robinson, Evo-devo and the evolution of social behavior. Trends Genet 23, 334–341 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  55. BG Hunt, et al., Sociality is linked to rates of protein evolution in a highly social insect. Mol Biol Evol 27, 497–500 (2010). · DOI
  56. BA Harpur, A Zayed, Accelerated evolution of innate immunity proteins in social insects: Adaptive evolution or relaxed constraint? Mol Biol Evol 30, 1665–1674 (2013). · DOI
  57. PK Visscher, A quantitative study of worker reproduction in honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25, 247–254 (1989). · DOI
  58. RE Page, EH Erickson, Reproduction by worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23, 117–126 (1988). · DOI
  59. TA Linksvayer, MJ Wade, Genes with social effects are expected to harbor more sequence variation within and between species. Evolution 63, 1685–1696 (2009). · DOI
  60. DW Hall, MAD Goodisman, The effects of kin selection on rates of molecular evolution in social insects. Evolution 66, 2080–2093 (2012). · DOI
  61. MV Rockman, The QTN program and the alleles that matter for evolution: All that’s gold does not glitter. Evolution 66, 1–17 (2012). · DOI
  62. RDH Barrett, HE Hoekstra, Molecular spandrels: Tests of adaptation at the genetic level. Nat Rev Genet 12, 767–780 (2011). · DOI
  63. CF Kent, S Minaei, BA Harpur, A Zayed, Recombination is associated with the evolution of genome structure and worker behavior in honey bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 18012–18017 (2012). · DOI
  64. DH Alexander, J Novembre, K Lange, Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res 19, 1655–1664 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  65. Elsik CG et al. (2014) Finding the missing honey bee genes: lessons learned from a genome upgrade. BMC Genomics 15:86. · DOI
  66. ZL Wang, et al., Transcriptome analysis of the Asian honey bee Apis cerana cerana. PLoS ONE 7, e47954 (2012). · DOI
  67. BS Weir, CC Cockerham, Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370 (1984).
  68. M Raymond, F Rousset, Genepop (v. 1.2)—Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86, 248–249 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  69. EM Willing, C Dreyer, C van Oosterhout, Estimates of genetic differentiation measured by F(ST) do not necessarily require large sample sizes when using many SNP markers. PLoS ONE 7, e42649 (2012). · DOI
  70. J Goudet, M Raymond, T de Meeüs, F Rousset, Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics 144, 1933–1940 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  71. JD Storey, R Tibshirani, Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 9440–9445 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  72. Y Benjamini, Y Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate—A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B Met 57, 289–300 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  73. ; Team RDC R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2011).
  74. P Andolfatto, Controlling type-I error of the McDonald-Kreitman test in genomewide scans for selection on noncoding DNA. Genetics 180, 1767–1771 (2008). · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Harpur, B. A., Kent, C. F., Molodtsova, D., Lebon, J. M. D., Alqarni, A. S., Owayss, A. A., & Zayed, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biology and
  • Department of Computer Science and Engineering, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada M3J 1P3; and
  • Department of Plant Protection, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-01-31
Volume
111
Issue
7
Pages
2614-2619
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1315506111
Cited by
201
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.