Cited by 543Wireless Power Transfer SystemsWireless Body Area NetworksNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 41 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Wireless power transfer to deep-tissue microimplants

Open access

Abstract

Progress in semiconductor technology paved the way for devices at the scale of a millimeter or less (“microimplants”), but the miniaturization of the power source remains challenging. Although wireless powering has been demonstrated, energy transfer beyond superficial depths in tissue has so far been limited by large coils (at least a centimeter in diameter) unsuitable for a microimplant. Here, we show that this limitation can be overcome by a method, termed midfield powering, to create a high-energy density region deep in tissue. We demonstrate wireless power transfer to a millimeter-sized device implanted five centimeters inside the chest on the surface of the heart—a depth once thought out of reach for wireless power transmission.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1403002111

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

13 Sources not found · 10 No full text of the sources · 9 No basis given · 6 Own result · 4 Own interpretation · 3 Partly supported · 2 Not checked yet · 1 Own method · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 28 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 17
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 5
20 of 20
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The porcine tissue and simulated tissue models used in the experiments adequately represent human tissue for the power transfer and safety conclusions.

    “The source and device positions within a porcine tissue volume, shown in Fig. 3 A and B using MRI reconstructions, are separated by at least 5 cm.”
    “To assess the exposure levels induced by power transfer, we operated our source over a simulated tissue volume defined by an anthropomorphic fiberglass shell.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The liquid solution with dielectric properties mimicking muscle tissue adequately represents muscle tissue for efficiency measurements.

    “when transferring power to a device submerged in a liquid solution with dielectric properties mimicking muscle tissue”
    “0.5% saline”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The rabbit cardiac pacing model is representative of human cardiac pacing for the wireless control claim.

    “As a demonstration of stimulation capabilities in vivo, we inserted the wireless electrostimulator into the lower epicardium of a rabbit.”
    “Cardiac rhythm can be controlled in a fully wireless manner by adjusting the operating frequencywhen coincident with the resonant frequency of the circuit, the pulse amplitudes are sufficient to pace the heart, as indicated by the increased rate and regularity of the ECG signal (Fig. 5D).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The source and device positions in the porcine tissue configurations represent realistic deep-tissue powering scenarios.

    “The source and device positions within a porcine tissue volume, shown in Fig. 3 A and B using MRI reconstructions, are separated by at least 5 cm.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. JC Schuder, HE Stephenson, JF Townsend, High level electromagnetic energy transfer through a closed chest wall. Inst Radio Engrs Int Conv Record 9, 119–126 (1961).
  2. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (2005) IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields 3 kHz to 300 GHz . IEEE Standard C95.1 (IEEE New York).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 543

Metadata

Authors
Ho, J. S., Yeh, A. J., Neofytou, E., Kim, S., Tanabe, Y., Patlolla, B., Beygui, R. E., & Poon, A. S. Y.
Affiliations
  • Departments of aElectrical Engineering and
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-05-19
Volume
111
Issue
22
Pages
7974-7979
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2103709281
Cited by
541
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 10
FWCI
29.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
wireless power transfer, inductive coupling, cardiac implantable electronic devices, physiological stimulation, energy density
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Electromagnetic Fields, Electronics, Medical, Equipment Design, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Miniaturization, Models, Theoretical, Electric Power Supplies, Rabbits, Semiconductors, Skin, Swine, Prostheses and Implants, Optics and Photonics, Wireless Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review