Cited by 220CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringVirus-based gene therapy researchViral-associated cancers and disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 29 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

RNA-guided endonuclease provides a therapeutic strategy to cure latent herpesviridae infection

Open access
Wang, Jianbin, Quake, Stephen R.·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Latent viral infection is a major obstacle for effective antiviral treatment and presents a continuous risk to the host. The dormant viral genome during latent infection provides few therapeutic targets other than itself for antiviral drug development. This study demonstrates the clearance of latent Epstein–Barr virus genomes in a subpopulation of Burkitt’s lymphoma patient-derived cells with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/Cas9 nuclease. Viral genome destruction leads to proliferation arrest and apoptosis in Epstein–Barr virus-infected cells, with no observed cytotoxicity to noninfected cells. Although many hurdles remain before this approach could be used in the clinic, this strategy may lead to a generalized approach to cure latent viral infections.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper shows that CRISPR/Cas9 can be targeted to the latent Epstein-Barr virus genome in Burkitt’s lymphoma cells, causing large viral deletions, proliferation arrest, apoptosis, and complete EBV clearance in a subpopulation of cells. It proposes RNA-guided endonuclease therapy as a potential strategy to cure latent herpesviridae infection, while noting that delivery and clinical development remain unresolved.

Key findings

  • In Raji cells, adding the EBV origin of replication (*oriP*) to the CRISPR plasmid increased transfection efficiency from <10% at 48 h to >60%.
  • Untreated Raji cells averaged 42 EBV genome copies per cell; treatment with the guide RNA mixture sgEBV1–7 reduced EBV load by ∼65% in live cells and ∼85% in dead cells. Single-cell analysis found that among 71 quality-controlled treated cells, 19 had no detectable EBV, 30 had dramatically decreased EBV load, and 22 were unchanged; the paper states that around 25% of treated cells were completely cleared of EBV and another 50% showed substantial decrease.
  • Guide RNAs targeting structural repeat regions (sgEBV1/2/6) completely stopped cell proliferation despite only a 26% decrease in EBV load, whereas sgEBV4/5 reduced the EBV genome by 85% but did not suppress proliferation as effectively as the full mixture.
  • Treatment caused apoptosis markers and no measurable proliferation change in EBV-negative DG-75 Burkitt’s lymphoma cells or primary human IMR90 lung fibroblasts, suggesting negligible cytotoxicity.

Methods

  • Burkitt’s lymphoma cell lines Raji, Namalwa, and DG-75, plus primary human lung fibroblast IMR-90, were cultured under standard conditions; CRISPR/Cas9 plasmids were modified from pX458 to include the pmax promoter, sgRNA, and EBV *oriP*, and delivered by nucleofection.
  • Seven guide RNAs were designed against the EBV B95-8 reference genome, targeting structural repeat regions, EBNA1, and EBNA3C/LMP1; editing was assessed by SURVEYOR assays, PCR, and Sanger sequencing.
  • Viral load was quantified by digital PCR on the Fluidigm BioMark system and by single-cell whole-genome amplification on the Fluidigm C1 system, with flow sorting and qPCR for EBV and human somatic loci.

Limitations

  • The paper states that further development into a practical therapeutic will require more sophisticated delivery approaches, which were beyond the scope of the study; it also states that off-target cleavage is a major concern for nuclease therapy, though it cites prior work suggesting off-target effects are not a substantial impediment for nonhuman genome targets.
  • The paper states that a single treatment did not eliminate all virus-infected cells, but argues that multiple doses could amplify efficacy geometrically and that partial elimination might allow immune control of residual latent infection.
  • Evident from the text: the work is limited to cultured cell lines and does not demonstrate in vivo delivery, animal-model efficacy, or direct off-target/safety assessment in this study; guide RNA delivery and plasmid replication are described as stochastic.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1410785111

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

25 Own result · 11 Own interpretation · 10 Not checked yet · 3 No basis given

Verify all 29 references — free account

Show all 24 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 23
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 7
25 of 25
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Existing antiviral therapies cannot effectively eradicate latent infection, so a cure is lacking for many prevalent viral diseases.

    “Although standard antiviral therapies can suppress active viral replication, no existing treatment can effectively eradicate latent infection and therefore a cure is lacking for many prevalent viral diseases.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The dormant viral genome during latent infection provides few therapeutic targets other than itself for antiviral drug development.

    “The dormant viral genome during latent infection provides few therapeutic targets other than itself for antiviral drug development.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    EBNA1 is crucial for many EBV functions, including gene regulation and latent genome replication.

    “EBNA1 is crucial for many EBV functions, including gene regulation and latent genome replication.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    EBNA3C and latent membrane protein-1 are essential for host cell transformation.

    “EBNA3C and latent membrane protein-1 are essential for host cell transformation, and we designed guide RNAs sgEBV3 and sgEBV7 to target the 5′ exons of these two proteins, respectively.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The EBV genome encodes about 85 genes, several of which are essential for lytic or latent infection.

    “The EBV genome encodes about 85 genes, several of which are essential for lytic or latent infection.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    EBNA1 binds to the EBV origin of replication (oriP) to maintain viral episomes and also regulates expression of other viral genes.

    “EBNA1 binds to the EBV origin of replication (oriP) to maintain viral episomes; it also regulates expression of other viral genes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The lack of an adequate in vitro model for HSV infection has hampered antiviral research.

    “Thus far, the lack of an adequate in vitro model for HSV infection has hampered antiviral research.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
Wang, J., & Quake, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Bioengineering,
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-08-25
Volume
111
Issue
36
Pages
13157-13162
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2084747588
Cited by
220
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 3
FWCI
10.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL099995, U01HL099999)
  • National Cancer Institute (P01CA139490, U54CA151459)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Viral-associated cancers and disorders
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, RNA-guided endonuclease, viral latency, herpesvirus, Epstein-Barr virus, Burkitt lymphoma, antiviral gene therapy, viral load reduction
MeSH terms
RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Base Sequence, Endonucleases, Herpesvirus 4, Human, Humans, Models, Biological, Molecular Sequence Data, Genome, Viral, Sequence Deletion, RNA Editing, Epstein-Barr Virus Infections, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review