Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Speciation with gene flow in equids despite extensive chromosomal plasticity

Open access
Jónsson, Hákon, Schubert, Mikkel, Seguin-Orlando, Andaine, Ginolhac, Aurélien, Petersen, Lillian, Fumagalli, Matteo, Albrechtsen, Anders, Petersen, Bent, Korneliussen, Thorfinn S., Vilstrup, Julia T., Lear, Teri, Myka, Jennifer Leigh, Lundquist, Judith, Miller, Donald C., Alfarhan, Ahmed H., Alquraishi, Saleh A., Al-Rasheid, Khaled A. S., Stagegaard, Julia, Strauss, Günter, Bertelsen, Mads Frost, Sicheritz-Ponten, Thomas, Antczak, Douglas F., Bailey, Ernest, Nielsen, Rasmus, Willerslev, Eske, Orlando, Ludovic·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Thirty years after the first DNA fragment from the extinct quagga zebra was sequenced, we set another milestone in equine genomics by sequencing its entire genome, along with the genomes of the surviving equine species. This extensive dataset allows us to decipher the genetic makeup underlying lineage-specific adaptations and reveal the complex history of equine speciation. We find that Equus first diverged in the New World, spread across the Old World 2.1–3.4 Mya, and finally experienced major demographic expansions and collapses coinciding with past climate changes. Strikingly, we find multiple instances of hybridization throughout the equine tree, despite extremely divergent chromosomal structures. This contrasts with theories promoting chromosomal incompatibilities as drivers for the origin of equine species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1412627111

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Jónsson, H., Schubert, M., Seguin-Orlando, A., Ginolhac, A., Petersen, L., Fumagalli, M., Albrechtsen, A., Petersen, B., Korneliussen, T. S., Vilstrup, J. T., Lear, T., Myka, J. L., Lundquist, J., Miller, D. C., Alfarhan, A. H., Alquraishi, S. A., Al-Rasheid, K. A. S., Stagegaard, J., Strauss, G., Bertelsen, M. F., Sicheritz-Ponten, T., Antczak, D. F., Bailey, E., Nielsen, R., Willerslev, E., & Orlando, L.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-12
Volume
111
Issue
52
Pages
18655-18660
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2049951752
Cited by
227
References
18
FWCI
19.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Speciation with gene flow in equids despite extensive chromosomal plasticity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1412627111
The paper
Jónsson, H., Schubert, M., Seguin-Orlando, A., Ginolhac, A., Petersen, L., Fumagalli, M., Albrechtsen, A., Petersen, B., Korneliussen, T. S., Vilstrup, J. T., Lear, T., Myka, J. L., Lundquist, J., Miller, D. C., Alfarhan, A. H., Alquraishi, S. A., Al-Rasheid, K. A. S., Stagegaard, J., Strauss, G., . . . Orlando, L. (2014). Speciation with gene flow in equids despite extensive chromosomal plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412627111

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.