Cited by 288Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Measuring missing heritability: Inferring the contribution of common variants

Open access
Golan, David, Lander, Eric S., Rosset, Saharon·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Studies have identified thousands of common genetic variants associated with hundreds of diseases. Yet, these common variants typically account for a minority of the heritability, a problem known as “missing heritability.” Geneticists recently proposed indirect methods for estimating the total heritability attributable to common variants, including those whose effects are too small to allow identification in current studies. Here, we show that these methods seriously underestimate the true heritability when applied to case–control studies of disease. We describe a method that provides unbiased estimates. Applying it to six diseases, we estimate that common variants explain an average of 60% of the heritability for these diseases. The framework also may be applied to case–control studies, extreme-phenotype studies, and other settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1419064111

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Elston RC, Buxbaum S, Jacobs KB, Olson JM (2000) Haseman and Elston revisited. Genet Epidemiol 19(1):1-17.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Golan, D., Lander, E. S., & Rosset, S.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-11-24
Volume
111
Issue
49
Pages
E5272-81
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2146415150
Cited by
288
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22
FWCI
14.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) (HG003067)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
missing heritability, common genetic variants, heritability estimation, restricted maximum likelihood, Haseman-Elston regression, case-control study, disease heritability, sample size, population structure
MeSH terms
Alleles, Computer Simulation, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Regression Analysis, Research Design, Genetic Variation, Models, Statistical, Case-Control Studies, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genomics, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review