Cited by 826Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetics and Physical PerformanceGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Genome-wide association analysis identifies 20 loci that influence adult height

Open access
Diabetes Genetics Initiative, Weedon, Michael N, The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Cambridge GEM Consortium, Lango, Hana, Lindgren, Cecilia M, Wallace, Chris, Evans, David M +24 more·2008·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Adult height is a model polygenic trait, but there has been limited success in identifying the genes underlying its normal variation. To identify genetic variants influencing adult human height, we used genome-wide association data from 13,665 individuals and genotyped 39 variants in an additional 16,482 samples. We identified 20 variants associated with adult height (P < 5 x 10(-7), with 10 reaching P < 1 x 10(-10)). Combined, the 20 SNPs explain approximately 3% of height variation, with a approximately 5 cm difference between the 6.2% of people with 17 or fewer 'tall' alleles compared to the 5.5% with 27 or more 'tall' alleles. The loci we identified implicate genes in Hedgehog signaling (IHH, HHIP, PTCH1), extracellular matrix (EFEMP1, ADAMTSL3, ACAN) and cancer (CDK6, HMGA2, DLEU7) pathways, and provide new insights into human growth and developmental processes. Finally, our results provide insights into the genetic architecture of a classic quantitative trait.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.121

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In height, the GIANT consortium confirmed inferences from 30,000 individuals when it expanded to 180,000, finding an additional 180 or so loci.

    “in the case of height, the GIANT consortium (http://www.broadinstitute.org/collaboration/giant/) confirmed the inferences from 30,000 individuals100 when they jumped to 180,000, finding an additional 180 or so loci14.”

    From Rare and common variants: twenty arguments (2012) · cites this paper as [100]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Initiative, D. G., Weedon, M. N., The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Cambridge GEM Consortium, Lango, H., Lindgren, C. M., Wallace, C., Evans, D. M., Mangino, M., Freathy, R. M., Perry, J. R. B., Stevens, S., Hall, A. S., Samani, N. J., Shields, B., Prokopenko, I., Farrall, M., Dominiczak, A., Johnson, T., Bergmann, S., Beckmann, J. S., Vollenweider, P., Waterworth, D. M., Mooser, V., Palmer, C. N. A., Morris, A. D., Ouwehand, W. H., Caulfield, M., Munroe, P. B., Hattersley, A. T., McCarthy, M. I., & Frayling, T. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • British Heart Foundation (GB)
  • SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • National Health Service (GB)
Corresponding author
Frayling, Timothy M
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2008-04-06
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
575-583
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W1998957301
Cited by
826
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 54
FWCI
70.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust (077011, 077016, 090532, 076113)
  • British Heart Foundation (PG/02/128/14470, PG/02/128, FS/05/061/19501)
  • Diabetes UK
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (116323, 112552, 3100AO-116323/1, 3100AO)
  • Medical Research Council (G9521010D)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
adult height, polygenic traits, genetic loci, single nucleotide polymorphisms, human growth, Hedgehog signaling, extracellular matrix, CDK6, HMGA2, genetic architecture, quantitative trait genetics
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Body Height, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Proteins, Genome, Human, Extracellular Matrix Proteins, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Hedgehog Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review