The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Eight-minute self-regulation intervention raises educational attainment at scale in individualist but not collectivist cultures
Open accessAbstract
Significance: High attrition from educational programs is a major obstacle to social mobility and a persistent source of economic inefficiency. Over two-thirds of students entering a 2-y institution fail to earn a credential in the United States. In online courses, attrition rates are even higher. In two large field experiments, we tested the conditions under which a writing activity that facilitates goal commitment and goal-directed behavior reduces attrition in online courses. The activity raised completion rates by up to 78% for members of individualist cultures and primarily for those who contended with predictable and surmountable obstacles in the form of everyday obligations, but it was ineffective in collectivist cultures and for people contending with other types of obstacles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, Kizilcec and Cohen (2017) found that MCII could increase individual goal attainment (massive open online courses, abbreviated by MOOCs, completion rates) in individualist cultures but not collectivist cultures.”
From A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentions on Goal Attainment (2021) · cites this paper as Kizilcec and Cohen (2017)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Kizilcec and Cohen's (2017) studies on completing MOOCsincluded Western and Eastern subjects and found MCII to be effective for learners in individualist cultures but not learners in collectivist cultures.”
From A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentions on Goal Attainment (2021) · cites this paper as Kizilcec and Cohen's (2017)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, in the moderator analysis, we excluded Kizilcec and Cohen (2017) because of the large sample size in their study, which might render the results of moderator effect unreliable.”
From A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Mental Contrasting With Implementation Intentions on Goal Attainment (2021) · cites this paper as Kizilcec and Cohen (2017)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 · Cited by 8,332
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
Bandura, A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l · Cited by 6,875
High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success
Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x · Cited by 6,557
Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.493 · Cited by 5,478
Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.291 · Cited by 4,263
Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study
Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., Duan, L., Almaliach, A., Ang, S., Arnadottir, J., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1197754 · Cited by 3,252
Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38002-1 · Cited by 3,236
Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit.
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Brandstätter, V. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.186 · Cited by 1,343
topicmodels : An R Package for Fitting Topic Models
Grün, B., & Hornik, K. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v040.i13 · Cited by 1,072
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- J Reich MOOC completion and retention in the context of student intent. Educause Review Online . Available at er.educause.edu/articles/2014/12/mooc-completion-and-retention-in-the-context-of-student-intent. Accessed June 1 2016. (2014).
- DH Schunk, BJ Zimmerman Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1994).
- S Lajoie, R Azevedo, Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. Handb Educ Psychol 2, 803–821 (2006).
- 10.1177/0146167297239004 · DOI
- G Hofstede, GJ Hofstede, M Minkov Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (McGraw-Hill, 3rd Ed, New York, 2010).
- 10.1515/9780691214429 · DOI · Paper page
- G Oettingen Rethinking Positive Thinking: Inside the New Science of Motivation (Current, New York, 2014).
- R Inglehart, D Oyserman, Individualism, autonomy and self-expression: The human development syndrome. Comparing Cultures: Dimensions of Culture in a Comparative Perspective, eds H Vinken, J Soeters, P Ester (Brill, Boston), pp. 74–96 (2004).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–106 of 106
Silva, M., Berríos, W., Sanzana, P., & Sigerson, A. (2023) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2022.2161858
“This difference could be cultural, in part, as Chilean society places comparatively higher value on collectivism, while the United States holds individualism as more important (Kizilcec & Cohen, 2017).”
BackgroundWrzecionkowska, D., Calleja, N., Cabrera, A. R., & Loving, R. D. (2022) · Acta de Investigación Psicológica · doi:10.22201/fpsi.20074719e.2022.2.456
“Algunos estudios indican también el menor impacto de MCII en culturas colectivistas, aunque la investigación que proporciona esta evidencia se en-focó en la finalización del curso en línea y no en un comportamiento de salud (Kizilcec & Cohen, 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-Regulation and Adult Learners
Zaky, H. (2021) · International Journal of Curriculum Development and Learning Measurement · doi:10.4018/ijcdlm.2021070104 · Cited by 6
OUTLINING PARTICIPATION IN THE FIRST MOOC OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN: A CASE STUDY
Γιασιράνης, Σ., & Sofos, A. (2020) · European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies · doi:10.46827/ejoe.v5i2.3358
“…2014; Kizilcec & Halawa, 2015; Skrypnyk, de Vries, & Hennis, 2015; Zheng, Rosson, Shih, & Carroll, 2015; Veletsianos, Reich, & Pasquini, 2016; Kizilcec & Cohen, 2017; Shapiro, et al., 2017) and the delay in their schedule due to other obligations (Nawrot & Doucet, 2014; Kizilcec & Halawa,…”
Kaptein, M. C. (2021) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-67322-2_7 · Cited by 1
Appiah-Kubi, P., & Zouhri, K. (n.d.) · 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings · doi:10.18260/1-2--47643
Metadata
- Authors
- Kizilcec, R. F., & Cohen, G. L.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kizilcec, René F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2017-04-10
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 4348-4353
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC5410783
- OpenAlex
- W2605718259
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 19.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Keywords
- self-regulation, educational attainment, individualism-collectivism, cross-cultural comparison, course completion
- MeSH terms
- Academic Success, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Culture, Humans, Individuality, Learning, Middle Aged, Students, United States, Universities, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
