Cited by 113Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessOnline Learning and Analytics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eight-minute self-regulation intervention raises educational attainment at scale in individualist but not collectivist cultures

Open access
Kizilcec, René F., Cohen, Geoffrey L.·2017·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: High attrition from educational programs is a major obstacle to social mobility and a persistent source of economic inefficiency. Over two-thirds of students entering a 2-y institution fail to earn a credential in the United States. In online courses, attrition rates are even higher. In two large field experiments, we tested the conditions under which a writing activity that facilitates goal commitment and goal-directed behavior reduces attrition in online courses. The activity raised completion rates by up to 78% for members of individualist cultures and primarily for those who contended with predictable and surmountable obstacles in the form of everyday obligations, but it was ineffective in collectivist cultures and for people contending with other types of obstacles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1611898114

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. J Reich MOOC completion and retention in the context of student intent. Educause Review Online . Available at er.educause.edu/articles/2014/12/mooc-completion-and-retention-in-the-context-of-student-intent. Accessed June 1 2016. (2014).
  2. DH Schunk, BJ Zimmerman Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1994).
  3. S Lajoie, R Azevedo, Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. Handb Educ Psychol 2, 803–821 (2006).
  4. 10.1177/0146167297239004 · DOI
  5. G Hofstede, GJ Hofstede, M Minkov Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (McGraw-Hill, 3rd Ed, New York, 2010).
  6. 10.1515/9780691214429 · DOI · Paper page
  7. G Oettingen Rethinking Positive Thinking: Inside the New Science of Motivation (Current, New York, 2014).
  8. R Inglehart, D Oyserman, Individualism, autonomy and self-expression: The human development syndrome. Comparing Cultures: Dimensions of Culture in a Comparative Perspective, eds H Vinken, J Soeters, P Ester (Brill, Boston), pp. 74–96 (2004).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 113

Metadata

Authors
Kizilcec, R. F., & Cohen, G. L.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Kizilcec, René F.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2017-04-10
Volume
114
Issue
17
Pages
4348-4353
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2605718259
Cited by
113
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 2
FWCI
19.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
self-regulation, educational attainment, individualism-collectivism, cross-cultural comparison, course completion
MeSH terms
Academic Success, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Culture, Humans, Individuality, Learning, Middle Aged, Students, United States, Universities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review