Cited by 182Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Dopamine in the medial amygdala network mediates human bonding

Open access
Atzil, Shir, Touroutoglou, Alexandra, Rudy, Tali, Salcedo, Stephanie, Feldman, Ruth, Hooker, Jacob M., Dickerson, Bradford C., Catana, Ciprian +1 more·2017·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Research in humans and nonhuman animals indicates that social affiliation, and particularly maternal bonding, depends on reward circuitry. Although numerous mechanistic studies in rodents demonstrated that maternal bonding depends on striatal dopamine transmission, the neurochemistry supporting maternal behavior in humans has not been described so far. In this study, we tested the role of central dopamine in human bonding. We applied a combined functional MRI-PET scanner to simultaneously probe mothers' dopamine responses to their infants and the connectivity between the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), the amygdala, and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), which form an intrinsic network (referred to as the "medial amygdala network") that supports social functioning. We also measured the mothers' behavioral synchrony with their infants and plasma oxytocin. The results of this study suggest that synchronous maternal behavior is associated with increased dopamine responses to the mother's infant and stronger intrinsic connectivity within the medial amygdala network. Moreover, stronger network connectivity is associated with increased dopamine responses within the network and decreased plasma oxytocin. Together, these data indicate that dopamine is involved in human bonding. Compared with other mammals, humans have an unusually complex social life. The complexity of human bonding cannot be fully captured in nonhuman animal models, particularly in pathological bonding, such as that in autistic spectrum disorder or postpartum depression. Thus, investigations of the neurochemistry of social bonding in humans, for which this study provides initial evidence, are warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1612233114

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Atzil S, Hendler T, Feldman R (2011) Specifying the neurobiological basis of human attachment: Brain, hormones, and behavior in synchronous and intrusive mothers. Neuropsychopharmacology 36(13):2603-2615.
  2. Atzil S, Hendler T, Zagoory-Sharon O, Winetraub Y, Feldman R (2012) Synchrony and specificity in the maternal and the paternal brain: Relations to oxytocin and vaso- pressin. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 51(8):798-811.
  3. Laurent HK, Ablow JC (2013) A face a mother could love: Depression-related maternal neural responses to infant emotion faces. Soc Neurosci 8(3):228-239.
  4. Moses-Kolko EL, et al. (2011) Rapid habituation of ventral striatal response to reward receipt in postpartum depression. Biol Psychiatry 70(4):395-399.
  5. Chase HW, Moses-Kolko EL, Zevallos C, Wisner KL, Phillips ML (2014) Disrupted pos- terior cingulate-amygdala connectivity in postpartum depressed women as measured with resting BOLD fMRI. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 9(8):1069-1075.
  6. Golinkoff RM, Can DD, Soderstrom M, Hirsh-Pasek K (2015) (Baby)talk to me: The social context of infant-directed speech and its effects on early language acquisition. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 24(5):339-344.
  7. Innis RB, et al. (2007) Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 27(9):1533-1539.
  8. Laruelle M (2000) Imaging synaptic neurotransmission with in vivo binding compe- tition techniques: A critical review. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 20(3):423-451.
  9. Sclafani V, Paukner A, Suomi SJ, Ferrari PF (2015) Imitation promotes affiliation in infant macaques at risk for impaired social behaviors. Dev Sci 18(4):614-621.
  10. Simpson EA, et al. (2014) Inhaled oxytocin increases positive social behaviors in newborn macaques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(19):6922-6927.
  11. Slaughter V, Ong SS (2014) Social behaviors increase more when children with ASD are imitated by their mother vs. an unfamiliar adult. Autism Res 7(5):582-589.
  12. Landa RJ, Holman KC, O'Neill AH, Stuart EA (2011) Intervention targeting de- velopment of socially synchronous engagement in toddlers with autism spec- trum disorder: A randomized controlled trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 52(1): 13-21.
  13. Nadel J, et al. (2000) Do children with autism have expectancies about the social behaviour of unfamiliar people? A pilot study using the still face paradigm. Autism 4(2):133-145.
  14. Schultz W (1998) Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. J Neurophysiol 80(1):1-27.
  15. Leckman JF, et al. (2004) Primary parental preoccupation: Circuits, genes, and the crucial role of the environment. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 111(7):753-771.
  16. Numan M (2017) Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology: Parental Behavior (Elsevier, Amsterdam).
  17. Bickart KC, Hollenbeck MC, Barrett LF, Dickerson BC (2012) Intrinsic amygdala-cortical functional connectivity predicts social network size in humans. J Neurosci 32(42): 14729-14741.
  18. Kühn S, et al. (2010) Why do I like you when you behave like me? Neural mechanisms mediating positive consequences of observing someone being imitated. Soc Neurosci 5(4):384-392.
  19. Atzil S, Hendler T, Feldman R (2014) The brain basis of social synchrony. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 9(8):1193-1202.
  20. Delaveau P, et al. (2010) Dopaminergic modulation of the default mode network in Parkinson's disease. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 20(11):784-792.
  21. Cole DM, et al. (2013) Dopamine-dependent architecture of cortico-subcortical net- work connectivity. Cereb Cortex 23(7):1509-1516.
  22. Stolzenberg DS, et al. (2007) Dopamine D1 receptor stimulation of the nucleus ac- cumbens or the medial preoptic area promotes the onset of maternal behavior in pregnancy-terminated rats. Behav Neurosci 121(5):907-919.
  23. Murray L, Kempton C, Woolgar M, Hooper R (1993) Depressed mothers' speech to their infants and its relation to infant gender and cognitive development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 34(7):1083-1101.
  24. Simonyan K, Horwitz B, Jarvis ED (2012) Dopamine regulation of human speech and bird song: A critical review. Brain Lang 122(3):142-150.
  25. Farde L, et al. (1985) Substituted benzamides as ligands for visualization of dopamine receptor binding in the human brain by positron emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82(11):3863-3867.
  26. Byars LG, et al. (2005) Variance reduction on randoms from delayed coincidence histograms for the HRRT. Proceedings of the IEEE Medical Imaging Conference (IEEE, New York), Vol 5, pp 2622-2626.
  27. Izquierdo-Garcia D, et al. (2014) An SPM8-based approach for attenuation correction combining segmentation and nonrigid template formation: application to simulta- neous PET/MR brain imaging. J Nucl Med 55(11):1825-1830.
  28. Watson CC (2000) New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 47(4):1587-1594.
  29. Catana C, et al. (2011) MRI-assisted PET motion correction for neurologic studies in an integrated MR-PET scanner. J Nucl Med 52(1):154-161.
  30. Muzic RF, Jr, Cornelius S (2001) COMKAT: Compartment model kinetic analysis tool. J Nucl Med 42(4):636-645.
  31. Logan J, et al. (1996) Distribution volume ratios without blood sampling from graphical analysis of PET data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 16(5):834-840.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atzil, S., Touroutoglou, A., Rudy, T., Salcedo, S., Feldman, R., Hooker, J. M., Dickerson, B. C., Catana, C., & Barrett, L. F.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2017-02-13
Volume
114
Issue
9
Pages
2361-2366
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2589089564
Cited by
182
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9
FWCI
37.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1R21HD076164-01A1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
dopamine, maternal bonding, social bonding, nucleus accumbens, medial prefrontal cortex, oxytocin, intrinsic functional connectivity, reward systems, social affiliation, autism spectrum disorder, postpartum depression
MeSH terms
Adult, Carbon Isotopes, Dopamine, Female, Humans, Infant, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Nucleus Accumbens, Object Attachment, Oxytocin, Reward, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Raclopride, Connectome, Corticomedial Nuclear Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review