Cited by 925Forest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in ChinaEnvironmental Changes in ChinaLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Effects of national ecological restoration projects on carbon sequestration in China from 2001 to 2010

Open access
Lu, Fei, Hu, Huifeng, Sun, Wenjuan, Zhu, Jiaojun, Liu, Guobin, Zhou, Wangming, Zhang, Quanfa, Shi, Peili +26 more·2018·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance China has launched six key ecological restoration projects since the late 1970s, but the contribution of these projects to terrestrial C sequestration remains unknown. In this study we examined the ecosystem C sink in the project area (∼16% of the country’s land area) and evaluated the project-induced C sequestration. The total annual C sink in the project area between 2001 and 2010 was estimated to be 132 Tg C per y, over half of which (74 Tg C per y, 56%) was caused by the implementation of the six projects. This finding indicates that the implementation of the ecological restoration projects in China has significantly increased ecosystem C sequestration across the country.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1700294115

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The total annual C sink of the project area was 132 Tg C year−1 in 2001-2010, over half attributed to implementation of these projects.

    “The total annual C sink of the project area was 132 Tg C year−1 in 2001–2010, over half of which was attributed to the implementation of these projects.176”

    From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [176]

  • Since the late 1970s, China has implemented six major ecological restoration projects covering 44.8% of China's forests and 23.2% of its grasslands.

    “Since the late 1970s, China has implemented six major ecological restoration projects, covering 44.8% of China's forests and 23.2% of its grasslands.175,176”

    From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [176]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [22]National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China 2011. China Statistical Yearbook 2011 (China Statistics Press, Beijing). Chinese.
  2. [25]Chen P, Wang X, Wang L, editors. 2008. Carbon Budget and Its Sink Promotion of Terrestrial Ecosystem in China (Science, Beijing). Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  3. [30]Pan Y, et al. 2010. Research on Important Issues of the 5th Phase of the Construction of Three North Shelter Forest System (China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing). Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  4. [34]Wu B, et al. 2017 Land Cover Atlas of the People’s Republic of China (1:1 000 000) (China Map Publishing House, Beijing). Chinese. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, F., Hu, H., Sun, W., Zhu, J., Liu, G., Zhou, W., Zhang, Q., Shi, P., Liu, X., Wu, X., Zhang, L., Wei, X., Dai, L., Zhang, K., Sun, Y., Xue, S., Zhang, W., Xiong, D., Deng, L., Liu, B., Zhou, L., Zhang, C., Zheng, X., Cao, J., Huang, Y., He, N., Zhou, G., Bai, Y., Xie, Z., Tang, Z., Wu, B., Fang, J., Liu, G., & Yu, G.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus (CA)
  • State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2018-04-16
Volume
115
Issue
16
Pages
4039-4044
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2801549624
Cited by
924
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 105 · 2025: 160 · 2024: 164 · 2023: 148 · 2022: 147 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 18 · 2014: 1
FWCI
161.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institute of Botany, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Institute of Hydrobiology, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Strategic Priority Programme of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA05060000, XDA05050700)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2016YFC0503403, 2017YFA0604702)
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (NA)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Forest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Environmental Changes in China
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
carbon sequestration, terrestrial carbon sink, ecosystem carbon storage, China, land use change, afforestation
MeSH terms
Carbon, China, Conservation of Natural Resources, Humans, Plants, Soil, Water Movements, Program Evaluation, Ecosystem, Biomass, Carbon Sequestration, Forests, Grassland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review