Cited by 72Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Adult-born neurons boost odor-reward association

Open access
Grelat, Anne, Benoit, Laura, Wagner, Sébastien, Moigneu, Carine, Lledo, Pierre-Marie, Alonso, Mariana·2018·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Olfaction is an important sensory modality driving fundamental behaviors. During odor-dependent learning, a positive value is commonly assigned to an odorant, and multiple forms of plasticity are involved when such odor-reward associations are formed. In rodents, one of the mechanisms underlying plasticity in the olfactory bulb consists in recruiting new neurons daily throughout life. However, it is still unknown whether adult-born neurons might participate in encoding odor value. Here, we demonstrate that exposure to reward-associated odors specifically increases activity of adult-born neurons but not preexisting neurons. Remarkably, adult-born neuron activation during rewarded odor presentation heightens discrimination learning and enhances the ability to update the odor value during reversal association. Moreover, in some cases, activation of this interneuron population can trigger olfactory learning without sensory stimulation. Taken together, our results show a specific involvement of adult-born neurons in facilitating odor-reward association during adaptive learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1716400115

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grelat, A., Benoit, L., Wagner, S., Moigneu, C., Lledo, P.-M., & Alonso, M.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Lledo, Pierre-Marie
  • Alonso, Mariana
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2018-02-21
Volume
115
Issue
10
Pages
2514-2519
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2791493345
Cited by
72
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-15-CE37-0004-01, ANR-15-NEUC-0004-02, ANR-10-LABX-73)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
adult neurogenesis, adult-born neurons, olfactory bulb, olfactory learning, reversal learning, interneurons
MeSH terms
Animals, Discrimination Learning, Female, Male, Models, Neurological, Odorants, Olfactory Bulb, Reward, Smell, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review